基于主成分分析的玉米杂交组合脱水性综合评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 318-325.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.007

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇下一篇

基于主成分分析的玉米杂交组合脱水性综合评价

杨明花(), 廖必勇, 刘强, 冯国瑞, 达吾来·杰克山, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 刘琪, 艾尔居玛·吐卢汗, 彭云承()

新疆伊犁哈萨克自治州农业科学研究所,新疆伊宁 835000

收稿日期:2023-06-29 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-19
通信作者: 彭云承(1965-),男,安徽临泉人,推广研究员,研究方向为玉米育种及栽培,(E-mail)382262338@qq.com
作者简介:杨明花(1983-),女,四川威远人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为玉米遗传育种及栽培,(E-mail)xjymh123@163.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区天山青年基金项目(2019Q097);伊犁哈萨克自治州科技攻关项目“制种玉米肥水调节关键技术研究与应用”(YZ2022B008)

Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis

YANG Minghua(), LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng()

Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Ili Prefecture, Yining Xinjiang 835000,China

Received:2023-06-29 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-19
Correspondence author: PENG Yuncheng(1965-),male, from Linquan, Anhui, extension researcher,research direction:maize breeding and cultivation,(E-mail)382262338@qq.com
Supported by:
The Tianshan Youth Fund Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2019Q097);The S & T Research Project of Yili Kazak Prefecture "Research and Application of Key Technology of Fertilizer and Water Regulation in Seed Maize"(YZ2022B008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】综合评价36份玉米杂交组合产量性状与收获时籽粒脱水速率快慢,筛选出籽粒脱水性快的品种,为选育高代群体育种材料提供依据。【方法】以4份玉米自交系为测验种,9份玉米高代系为待测系,采用 NCII不完全双列杂交组配设计,对其籽粒脱水速率及产量性状进行相关性、主成分、隶属函数、聚类分析等进行综合评价。【结果】玉米杂交组合各性状的变异系数从小到大排序依次为生育期<株高<穗粗<穗行数<轴粗<百粒重<行粒数<穗长<穗高<穗轴含水率<单株粒重<籽粒脱水速率<收获时籽粒含水率<苞叶含水率<籽粒脱水含水率<秃尖长,秃尖长为64.63%、籽粒脱水含水率27.31%,生育期仅为1.39%。收获时籽粒含水率与株高、穗粗、行粒数和生育期呈极显著正相关。籽粒脱水速率与株高、穗粗和行粒数均呈显著负相关,与生育期和穗轴含水率呈极显著负相关。前8个主成分的特征向量值和贡献率达到了86.39%。【结论】筛选出7个脱水快利于机械收获的玉米杂交组合。

关键词: 玉米; 主成分; 杂交组合; 脱水性; 综合评价

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the yield traits of 36 maize hybrid combinations and do a comprehensive evaluation of the rate of grain dehydration at harvest in the hope of selecting the varieties with fast grain dehydration,for the breeding of sports materials of high generation group.【Methods】 Using 4 maize inbred lines as test species and 9 maize high generation lines as pending test lines, NCII incomplete double-diallel hybrid group was adopted to comprehensively evaluate the correlation, principal component, membership function and cluster analysis of grain dehydration rate and yield characters.【Results】 The results showed that the order of variation coefficients of various characters in the hybrid combination was as follows:growth period < plant height < ear diameter<number of rows per ear < shaft diameter <hundred-grain weight < number of grains per row < ear length < ear height < corncob water content < single grain weight < grain dehydration rate < grain water content at harvest < bract water content < grain dehydration water content < bald tip length; and the bald tip length was 64.63% and grain dehydration water content was 27.31%,the growth period was only 1.39%.The grain water content at harvest was positively correlated with plant height, ear diameter, grain number per row and growth period.The grain dehydration rate after maturity is significantly negatively correlated with plant height, ear diameter, grain number per row and growth period was extremely significantly negatively correlated with the corncob water content at maturity.The characteristic vector-value and contribution rate of the first eight principal components reached 86.39%.【Conclusion】 According to the contribution rate of each comprehensive index, based on the comprehensive index of cluster analysis, 7 hybrid combinations with fast dehydration have been selected, which is conducive to mechanical harvest.These excellent combinations have utilization value in breeding.

Key words: corn; principal component; hybrid combination; dehydration property; comprehensive evaluation

中图分类号:

S513

杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 冯国瑞, 达吾来·杰克山, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 刘琪, 艾尔居玛·吐卢汗, 彭云承. 基于主成分分析的玉米杂交组合脱水性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 318-325.

YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng. Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 318-325.

图/表 5

参考文献 24

[1]	王琦琪, 陈印军. 中国黑龙江、吉林两省与美国玉米生产成本比较分析[J]. 世界农业, 2018,(2):135-141.
	WANG Qiqi, CHEN Yinjun. Comparative analysis of corn production costs between China's Heilongjiang and Jilin provinces and the United States[J]. World Agriculture, 2018,(2):135-141.
[2]	赵久然, 王荣焕. 中国玉米生产发展历程、存在问题及对策[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2013, 15(3):1-6.
	ZHAO Jiuran, WANG Ronghuan. The development process, existing problems and countermeasures of China's corn production[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, 15(3):1-6.
[3]	李少昆. 美国玉米生产技术特点与启示[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(3):1-5.
	LI Shaokun. Characteristics and enlightenment of American corn production technology[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(3):1-5.
[4]	王克如, 李少昆. 玉米机械粒收破碎率研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):2018-2026. DOI
	WANG Keru, LI Shaokun. Research progress of corn grain mechanical harvest fragmentation rate[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11):2018-2026. DOI
[5]	张凤启, 王邑双, 丁勇, 等. 玉米籽粒脱水速率研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(11):4-8. DOI
	ZHANG Fengqi, WANG Yishuang, DING Yong, et al. Research progress in dehydration rate of corn grain[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(11):4-8.
[6]	孙乐秀. 玉米自交系机械化收获相关性状及其SNP标记关联分析[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
	SUN Lexiu. Correlation analysis of mechanical harvest related traits and SNP markers of maize inbred lines[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.
[7]	王志红, 周福民, 郭华, 等. 玉米籽粒脱水速率研究分析及种质改良策略[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(7):15-18. DOI
	WANG Zhihong, ZHOU Fumin, GUO Hua, et al. Research and analysis of corn grain dehydration rate and germplasm improvement strategy[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(7):15-18.
[8]	闫淑琴, 李德新. 玉米子粒脱水速度的遗传及相关分析和技术措施对脱水的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 1994,(6):9-11.
	YAN Shuqin, LI Dexin. Genetic and correlation analysis of corn grain dehydration rate and the impact of technical measures on dehydration[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 1994,(6):9-11.
[9]	Zuber M S. Effect of the Y-y factor pair on yield and other agronomic characters in corn[D]. Iowa State College, 1950.
[10]	Crane P L, Miles S R, Newman J E. Factors associated with varietal differences in rate of field drying in corn[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1959, 51(6):318-320. DOI URL
[11]	李凤海, 郭佳丽, 于涛, 等. 不同熟期玉米杂交种及其亲本子粒脱水速率的比较研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(6):17-20,24.
	LI Fenghai, GUO Jiali, YU Tao, et al. Comparative study on grain dehydration rate of maize hybrids and their parents at different maturity[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2012, 20(6):17-20, 24.
[12]	闫淑琴, 苏俊, 李春霞, 等. 玉米籽粒灌浆、脱水速率的相关与通径分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2007,(4):1-4.
	YAN Shuqin, SU Jun, LI Chunxia, et al. Correlation and path analysis of corn grain filling and dehydration rate[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(4):1-4.
[13]	Miller M F, Hughes H D. Cooperative variety tests of corn:variety tests of corn at Columbia, MO[J]. Missouri Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 1910:144-156.
[14]	谭福忠, 韩翠波, 邹双利, 等. 极早熟玉米品种籽粒脱水特性的初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(7):161-168.
	TAN Fuzhong, HAN Cuibo, ZOU Shuangli, et al. Preliminary study on grain dehydration characteristics of very early maturing maize varieties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(7):161-168.
[15]	赵宽厚. 早熟玉米高代系宜机收特性研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
	ZHAO Kuanhou. Study on the characteristics of early maturing maize high-generation lines suitable for machine harvest[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018.
[16]	王平, 徐加利, 闫保罗, 等. 基于主成分-聚类-逐步回归分析的夏玉米品种光温利用能力综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):71-77.
	WANG Ping, XU Jiali, YAN Baoluo, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of light and temperature utilization capacity of summer maize varieties based on principal component-cluster-stepwise regression analysis[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(10):71-77.
[17]	经菊, 郑常祥, 陈柔屹, 等. 贵州玉米杂交组合的主成分分析[J]贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(8):4-6.
	JING Ju, ZHENG Changxiang, CHEN Rouyi, et al. Principal component analysis of maize hybrid combinations in Guizhou[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(8):4-6
[18]	李璐璐, 明博, 谢瑞芝, 等. 玉米品种穗部性状差异及其对籽粒脱水的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10):1855-1867. DOI
	LI Lulu, MING Bo, XIE Ruizhi, et al. Differences in ear traits of maize varieties and their effects on grain dehydration[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10):1855-1867.
[19]	Purdy J L, Crane P L. Inheritance of drying rate in“mature”corn(Zea mays L.)[J]. Crop Science, 1967, 7(4):294-297. DOI URL
[20]	张树光, 冯学民, 高树仁, 等. 玉米成熟期籽粒含水量与果穗性状的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 1994, 10(2):15-17.
	ZHANG Shuguang, FENG Xuemin, GAO Shuren, et al. The relationship between grain water content and ear traits in mature maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 1994, 10(2):15-17.
[21]	吕香玲. 玉米籽粒含水量及脱水速率的遗传与性状相关[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2000.
	LYU Xiangling. Genetic and trait correlation of water content and dehydration rate of corn grain[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2000.
[22]	杨村. 玉米籽粒水分含量及脱水速率的遗传研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学,1997.
	YANG Cun. Genetic study on water content and dehydration rate of corn grain[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University,1997.
[23]	张立国, 范骐骥, 陈喜昌, 等. 玉米生理成熟后籽粒脱水速率与主要农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012,(3):1-5.
	ZHANG Liguo, FAN Qiji, CHEN Xichang, et al. Correlation analysis between grain dehydration rate and main agronomic traits after physiological maturity of maize[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012,(3):1-5.
[24]	张采波, 余庭跃, 文守云, 等. 成熟期玉米籽粒含水量与主要农艺性状的相关分析[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(8):34-38.
	ZHANG Caibo, YU Tingyue, WEN Shouyun, et al. Correlation analysis between moisture content of corn grain and main agronomic traits at maturity[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(8):34-38.

性状 Traits	株高 Plant height (cm)	穗高 Ear height (cm)	穗长 Ear length (cm)	秃尖长 Corn bald tip (cm)	穗粗 Ear diameter (cm)	穗行数 Ear row number	行粒数 Row grain number	轴粗 Axle diameter (cm)	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	生育期 Growth period (d)	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g)	苞叶含水率 Bracts water content (%)	穗轴含水率 Spike shaft water content (%)	籽粒脱水含水率 Grain dehydration moisture content (%)	籽粒脱水速率 Grain dehydration rate (%)	收获时籽粒含水率 At harvest time grain water content (%)
最大值MAX	307.50	131.94	22.85	2.66	5.35	17.55	42.87	2.83	40.99	105.67	246.82	48.12	51.53	45.48	0.77	21.23
最小值MIN	254.14	82.36	14.39	0.18	4.26	14.20	30.70	2.04	28.72	100.33	117.25	13.65	24.22	8.95	0.32	10.50
标准差 SD	13.803	11.225	1.700	0.695	0.257	0.957	3.235	0.191	2.809	1.411	27.482	6.852	5.727	7.443	0.10	2.99
平均数 Average	285.23	107.26	18.12	1.09	4.82	15.80	37.28	2.51	35.72	103.25	178.87	28.24	38.37	27.64	0.59	16.15
变异系数 Coefficient CV	4.91	10.61	9.52	64.63	5.41	6.15	8.80	7.69	7.98	1.39	15.58	24.61	15.14	27.31	17.86	18.78

性状 Traits	株高 Plant height (cm)	穗高 Ear height (cm)	穗长 Ear length (cm)	秃尖长 Corn bald tip (cm)	穗粗 Ear diameter (cm)	穗行数 Ear row number	行粒数 Row grain number	轴粗 Axle diameter (cm)	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	生育期 Growth period (d)	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g)	苞叶含水率 Bracts water content (%)	穗轴含水率 Spike shaft water content (%)	籽粒脱水含水率 Grain dehydration moisture content (%)	籽粒脱水速率 Grain dehydration rate (%)	收获时籽粒含水率 At harvest time grain water content (%)
最大值MAX	307.50	131.94	22.85	2.66	5.35	17.55	42.87	2.83	40.99	105.67	246.82	48.12	51.53	45.48	0.77	21.23
最小值MIN	254.14	82.36	14.39	0.18	4.26	14.20	30.70	2.04	28.72	100.33	117.25	13.65	24.22	8.95	0.32	10.50
标准差 SD	13.803	11.225	1.700	0.695	0.257	0.957	3.235	0.191	2.809	1.411	27.482	6.852	5.727	7.443	0.10	2.99
平均数 Average	285.23	107.26	18.12	1.09	4.82	15.80	37.28	2.51	35.72	103.25	178.87	28.24	38.37	27.64	0.59	16.15
变异系数 Coefficient CV	4.91	10.61	9.52	64.63	5.41	6.15	8.80	7.69	7.98	1.39	15.58	24.61	15.14	27.31	17.86	18.78

性状 Trait	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	X₁₀	X₁₁	X₁₂	X₁₃	X₁₄	X₁₅	X₁₆
X₁	1.000
X₂	0.536^**	1.000
X₃	0.002	-0.207	1.000
X₄	-0.240	0.010	-0.206	1.000
X₅	0.059	0.068	0.136	0.050	1.000
X₆	-0.021	0.172	-0.134	0.212	0.300	1.000
X₇	0.329^*	0.033	0.571^**	0.233	0.352^*	-0.028	1.000
X₈	-0.159	-0.011	0.276	0.091	0.252	0.213	0.084	1.000
X₉	0.231	0.066	0.465^**	-0.159	0.457^**	-0.064	0.641^**	0.381^*	1.000
X₁₀	0.017	0.376^*	-0.121	-0.005	-0.202	0.198	-0.282	-0.252	-0.413^*	1.000
X₁₁	0.297	0.010	0.458^**	-0.456	0.149	-0.079	0.459^**	-0.180	0.249	0.127	1.000
X₁₂	0.074	0.035	-0.016	-0.185	0.132	-0.099	-0.082	-0.061	0.061	0.11	0.308	1.000
X₁₃	0.144	-0.078	0.226	0.130	0.022	-0.377	-0.045	0.020	0.044	-0.228	-0.05	-0.122	1.000
X₁₄	-0.217	-0.037	-0.060	-0.016	0.314	0.189	-0.005	0.273	-0.034	-0.042	-0.308	0.078	-0.127	1.000
X₁₅	-0.349^*	0.089	0.007	-0.123	-0.375^*	0.022	-0.302^*	-0.145	-0.201	-0.607^**	-0.003	0.287	-0.429^**	0.142	1.000
X₁₆	0.524^**	0.112	-0.011	0.186	0.401^**	0.116	0.376^**	0.120	0.271	0.502^**	-0.049	-0.141	0.228	-0.016	-0.820^**	1.000

性状 Trait	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	X₁₀	X₁₁	X₁₂	X₁₃	X₁₄	X₁₅	X₁₆
X₁	1.000
X₂	0.536^**	1.000
X₃	0.002	-0.207	1.000
X₄	-0.240	0.010	-0.206	1.000
X₅	0.059	0.068	0.136	0.050	1.000
X₆	-0.021	0.172	-0.134	0.212	0.300	1.000
X₇	0.329^*	0.033	0.571^**	0.233	0.352^*	-0.028	1.000
X₈	-0.159	-0.011	0.276	0.091	0.252	0.213	0.084	1.000
X₉	0.231	0.066	0.465^**	-0.159	0.457^**	-0.064	0.641^**	0.381^*	1.000
X₁₀	0.017	0.376^*	-0.121	-0.005	-0.202	0.198	-0.282	-0.252	-0.413^*	1.000
X₁₁	0.297	0.010	0.458^**	-0.456	0.149	-0.079	0.459^**	-0.180	0.249	0.127	1.000
X₁₂	0.074	0.035	-0.016	-0.185	0.132	-0.099	-0.082	-0.061	0.061	0.11	0.308	1.000
X₁₃	0.144	-0.078	0.226	0.130	0.022	-0.377	-0.045	0.020	0.044	-0.228	-0.05	-0.122	1.000
X₁₄	-0.217	-0.037	-0.060	-0.016	0.314	0.189	-0.005	0.273	-0.034	-0.042	-0.308	0.078	-0.127	1.000
X₁₅	-0.349^*	0.089	0.007	-0.123	-0.375^*	0.022	-0.302^*	-0.145	-0.201	-0.607^**	-0.003	0.287	-0.429^**	0.142	1.000
X₁₆	0.524^**	0.112	-0.011	0.186	0.401^**	0.116	0.376^**	0.120	0.271	0.502^**	-0.049	-0.141	0.228	-0.016	-0.820^**	1.000

性状 Trait	因子1 Component 1	因子2 Component 2	因子3 Component 3	因子4 Component 4	因子5 Component 5	因子6 Component 6	因子7 Component 7	因子8 Component 8
X₁	0.35	-0.27	0.25	-0.28	-0.07	0.07	-0.12	-0.03
X₂	0.12	-0.28	0.42	-0.03	0.12	0.39	-0.27	-0.14
X₃	0.27	0.16	-0.36	0.14	0.34	0.24	-0.02	0.23
X₄	-0.21	0.22	0.27	-0.21	0.18	0.24	0.41	-0.02
X₅	0.23	0.28	0.23	0.23	-0.20	0.14	0.34	0.26
X₆	-0.03	0.06	0.44	0.33	0.32	-0.12	0.30	0.08
X₇	0.44	0.09	-0.08	0.08	0.17	-0.23	-0.05	0.13
X₈	0.05	0.41	0.08	0.22	0.16	0.33	-0.30	-0.36
X₉	0.37	0.25	-0.06	0.09	0.05	0.12	-0.05	-0.37
X₁₀	-0.14	-0.42	0.11	0.25	0.27	0.33	0.00	0.27
X₁₁	0.31	-0.25	-0.27	0.18	0.07	0.06	0.36	0.09
X₁₂	0.06	-0.17	-0.08	0.27	-0.63	0.33	0.28	-0.27
X₁₃	0.04	0.16	-0.17	-0.47	-0.09	0.51	-0.02	0.40
X₁₄	-0.05	0.23	0.20	0.34	-0.37	-0.04	-0.43	0.49
X₁₅	0.41	-0.27	0.17	-0.03	-0.04	-0.13	-0.11	0.07
X₁₆	0.27	0.21	0.32	-0.36	-0.13	-0.17	0.18	0.05
特征值 Eigen value	3.71	2.47	2.04	1.78	1.12	1.00	0.93	0.78
百分率 Percentage (%)	23.19	15.45	12.77	11.11	6.98	6.26	5.79	4.84
累计百分率 Accumulated percentage (%)	23.19	38.65	51.42	62.52	69.51	75.76	81.55	86.39
权重Weight	0.27	0.18	0.15	0.13	0.08	0.07	0.07	0.06

基于主成分分析的玉米杂交组合脱水性综合评价

Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 24

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

组合名称 Combination name	综合评价得分值 Compre- hensive evalua- tion value	排名 Ranking	组合名称 Combination name	综合评价得分值 Compre- hensive evalua- tion value	排名 Ranking	组合名称 Combination name	综合评价得分值 Compre- hensive evalua- tion value	排名 Ranking
1×S7-1	0.50	25	2×S7-4	0.65	10	3×S7-7	0.62	11
1×S7-2	0.52	22	2×S7-5	0.57	18	3×S7-8	0.53	21
1×S7-3	0.58	16	2×S7-6	0.32	35	3×S7-9	0.78	1
1×S7-4	0.44	27	2×S7-7	0.74	3	4×S7-1	0.4	31
1×S7-5	0.38	32	2×S7-8	0.41	30	4×S7-2	0.41	29
1×S7-6	0.25	36	2×S7-9	0.65	9	4×S7-3	0.50	23
1×S7-7	0.57	19	3×S7-1	0.50	24	4×S7-4	0.71	4
1×S7-8	0.48	26	3×S7-2	0.76	2	4×S7-5	0.70	5
1×S7-9	0.55	20	3×S7-3	0.57	17	4×S7-6	0.58	15
2×S7-1	0.35	34	3×S7-4	0.65	8	4×S7-7	0.58	14
2×S7-2	0.68	7	3×S7-5	0.69	6	4×S7-8	0.36	33
2×S7-3	0.42	28	3×S7-6	0.61	13	4×S7-9	0.61	12

[1]	欧源, 罗莎莎, 王如月, 孙雅丽, 虎海防. 盐胁迫对美国黑核桃幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 393-401.
[2]	孟涵颖, 郭丹丹, 何婉洁, 张伟伟, 张建萍, 陈静. 双斑长跗萤叶甲取食玉米叶片的挥发物分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 421-433.
[3]	王善博, 阿力木·买买提吐尔逊, 李谦绪, 杜志高, 张伟. 鲜食玉米柔性采摘低损集穗收获割台设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 217-229.
[4]	欧阳单华, 赵康, 宋东博, 柳自清, 郭旺珍, 刘燕, 顾爱星, 阿扎提古丽·麦麦提图尔, 艾力卡尔江·艾麦尔. 35份棉花品系对黄萎病抗性鉴定及综合分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 9-18.
[5]	巴音花, 梁龙, 何鹏飞, 李佳莹, 贺鑫, 贺三刚, 李文蓉. 哈萨克羊与特克赛尔羊不同杂交组合后代羔羊早期生长性能的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2331-2340.
[6]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[7]	陈占辉, 孙强, 任姣姣, 黄博文, 许加波, 杨杰, 吴鹏昊. 玉米叶宽的QTL定位及全基因组选择分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1606-1613.
[8]	蓝陈仪航, 姚禹博, 周俊祥, 付开赟, 丁新华, 尹晓辉, 刘文, 王娜, 郭文超, 邓建宇. 亚洲玉米螟性信息素鉴定及其应用研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1614-1622.
[9]	赵连佳, 李淦, 徐麟, 颜国荣, 刘宁, 王帆, 邓超宏, 阿布都克尤木·阿不都热孜克, 王聪, 王威. 不同大豆品种在新疆生态区主要农艺性状表现及产量的相关分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670.
[10]	邵盘霞, 赵准, 邵武奎, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 李建平, 胡文冉, 黄全生. 玉米ZmCDPK22基因在干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378.
[11]	陆晏天, 桑志勤, 徐灿, 张力, 夏春兰, 王友德, 李伟, 陈树宾. 历年新疆和宁夏审定玉米品种主要性状的演化及品种审定现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388.
[12]	姚庆, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 杨明花, 李强, 苗昊翠, 崔宏亮. 藜麦种子对萌发温度的响应及低温胁迫萌发能力鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149.
[13]	杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
[14]	周广威, 韩登旭, 朱琦, 张少民. 耐低磷新疆春玉米基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 847-856.
[15]	陈果, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 胡文冉, 赵准, 黄全生. 玉米钙依赖蛋白激酶全基因组鉴定及抗旱表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 857-864.