新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (3): 556-564.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.03.004
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
赵后秀1(), 郝先哲2, 石峰1, 李军宏1, 梁琪1, 王潭刚3, 田立文4, 罗宏海2, 王军1()
收稿日期:
2023-08-05
出版日期:
2024-03-20
发布日期:
2024-04-19
通信作者:
王军(1980-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为作物高产生理与节水栽培,(E-mail)作者简介:
赵后秀(1999-),男,江苏宿迁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产生理与节水栽培,(E-mail)2545747822@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHAO Houxiu1(), HAO Xianzhe2, SHI Feng1, LI Junhong1, LIANG Qi1, WANG Tangang3, TIAN Liwen4, LUO Honghai2, WANG Jun1()
Received:
2023-08-05
Online:
2024-03-20
Published:
2024-04-19
Correspondence author:
WANG Jun(1980-),male,from Xinjiang, researcher,doctor,research direction of high yield physiology and water-saving cultivation of crops,(E-mail) Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】 研究有机液体肥对新疆南疆膜下滴灌棉花冠层特征、产量和品质的影响。【方法】 选用塔河2号为参试品种,以单施化肥棉田为对照(CK),设置有机液体肥处理(T1、T2、T3、T4、T5),测定并分析不同处理下株高、主茎叶片数、叶面积指数、叶倾角、产量和品质的变化。【结果】 与CK相比,施用有机液体肥提高了棉花株高、主茎叶片数、叶面积指数、叶倾角与地上部生物量。当籽棉产量达到6 000 kg/hm2以上时,棉花株高、主茎叶片数、叶面积指数和叶倾角较CK分别增加1.3~10.3 cm、2.0~2.3片、1.7~2.9、5.6~9.3°,营养和生殖器官干物质重较CK分别增加了1.3~25.7和0.1~44.5 g/株。且当籽棉产量超过6 000 kg/hm2时,籽棉产量、单铃重、总铃数较CK分别增加了17.2%~31.9%、15.5%~28.8%和3.5%~10.1%。此外,与CK相比,施用有机液体肥还提高了棉花上半部纤维平均长度、整齐度和断裂比强度。【结论】 与单施化肥相比,施用有机液体肥能够改善棉花冠层结构,促进干物质积累,增产提质,且成本低,易操作,适合新疆南疆棉区推广应用。
中图分类号:
赵后秀, 郝先哲, 石峰, 李军宏, 梁琪, 王潭刚, 田立文, 罗宏海, 王军. 有机液体肥对棉花冠层特征、产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 556-564.
ZHAO Houxiu, HAO Xianzhe, SHI Feng, LI Junhong, LIANG Qi, WANG Tangang, TIAN Liwen, LUO Honghai, WANG Jun. Effects of organic liquid fertilizer on canopy characteristics,yield and quality of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 556-564.
施肥模式 Fertilization model | 试验点 Experimental site | 条田号 Strip number |
---|---|---|
有机液体肥处理 Organic liquid fertilizer treatment | 44团中队 | 44-中-2(T1) |
49团9连 | 49-9-南(T2) | |
51团4连 | 51-4(T3) | |
53团4连 | 53-4-14(T4) | |
53团7连 | 53-7-1(T5) | |
单施化肥处理 Single fertilizer treatment | 53团4连 | 53-4-14(CK) |
表1 试验点情况
Tab.1 Details of the test site
施肥模式 Fertilization model | 试验点 Experimental site | 条田号 Strip number |
---|---|---|
有机液体肥处理 Organic liquid fertilizer treatment | 44团中队 | 44-中-2(T1) |
49团9连 | 49-9-南(T2) | |
51团4连 | 51-4(T3) | |
53团4连 | 53-4-14(T4) | |
53团7连 | 53-7-1(T5) | |
单施化肥处理 Single fertilizer treatment | 53团4连 | 53-4-14(CK) |
条田号 Tiaoda | 有机质 Organic matter (g/ kg) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen (mg/ kg) | 速效磷 Rapid available phosphorus (mg/ kg) | 速效钾 Rapidly available potassium (mg/ kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
44-中-2 (T1) | 12.67 | 68.56 | 12.45 | 74.16 | 7.9 |
49-9-南 (T2) | 13.58 | 69.23 | 13.65 | 78.85 | 7.8 |
51-4 (T3) | 14.85 | 71.65 | 12.31 | 76.34 | 7.7 |
53-4-14 (T4) | 14.12 | 69.83 | 11.98 | 72.65 | 7.8 |
53-7-1 (T5) | 12.24 | 70.06 | 12.03 | 77.42 | 7.9 |
CK | 14.12 | 69.83 | 11.98 | 77.65 | 7.8 |
表2 试验点土壤基本概况
Tab.2 Basic soil profiles of test sites
条田号 Tiaoda | 有机质 Organic matter (g/ kg) | 碱解氮 Alkali hydrolyzable nitrogen (mg/ kg) | 速效磷 Rapid available phosphorus (mg/ kg) | 速效钾 Rapidly available potassium (mg/ kg) | pH |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
44-中-2 (T1) | 12.67 | 68.56 | 12.45 | 74.16 | 7.9 |
49-9-南 (T2) | 13.58 | 69.23 | 13.65 | 78.85 | 7.8 |
51-4 (T3) | 14.85 | 71.65 | 12.31 | 76.34 | 7.7 |
53-4-14 (T4) | 14.12 | 69.83 | 11.98 | 72.65 | 7.8 |
53-7-1 (T5) | 12.24 | 70.06 | 12.03 | 77.42 | 7.9 |
CK | 14.12 | 69.83 | 11.98 | 77.65 | 7.8 |
滴水次数 Number of drops | 滴水时间 Date (M/D) | 施肥 Apply fertilizer (kg/hm2) | 养分含量 Nutrient content (N-P2O5- K2O)g/L |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6/15~6/20 | 300 | 110-60-20 |
2 | 6/25~6/30 | 450 | 110-60-20 |
3 | 7/5~7/10 | 300 | 110-60-50 |
4 | 7/15~7/20 | 450 | 110-60-50 |
5 | 7/20~7/30 | 450 | 110-60-50 |
6 | 8/10~8/15 | 150 | 110-60-50 |
7 | 8/15~8/20 | 150 | 110-60-50 |
表3 有机液体肥处理情况
Tab.3 Details of organic liquid fertilizer treatment test site
滴水次数 Number of drops | 滴水时间 Date (M/D) | 施肥 Apply fertilizer (kg/hm2) | 养分含量 Nutrient content (N-P2O5- K2O)g/L |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6/15~6/20 | 300 | 110-60-20 |
2 | 6/25~6/30 | 450 | 110-60-20 |
3 | 7/5~7/10 | 300 | 110-60-50 |
4 | 7/15~7/20 | 450 | 110-60-50 |
5 | 7/20~7/30 | 450 | 110-60-50 |
6 | 8/10~8/15 | 150 | 110-60-50 |
7 | 8/15~8/20 | 150 | 110-60-50 |
条田号 Tiaoda | 地上营养器官干物质重(茎、叶) Dry matter weight of aboveground vegetative organs(stems,leaves) | 生殖器官干物质重(蕾、花、铃) Dry matter weight of reproductive organs(bud,flower,bell) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 盛花期 Full flowering stage | 盛铃期 Full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Later full boll stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | 盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 盛花期 Full flowering stage | 盛铃期 Full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Later full boll stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | |
T1 | 7.4b | 23.6b | 33.5b | 41.5ab | 50.5a | 0.1b | 3.1b | 16.6ab | 38.5a | 79.1b |
T2 | 5.0c | 21.5bc | 25.0c | 35.9bc | 43.4ab | 0.1b | 3.1b | 16.7ab | 37.1a | 71.0b |
T3 | 10.2a | 32.0a | 42.3a | 51.1a | 54.3a | 0.4a | 7.4a | 29.0a | 44.8a | 98.9a |
T4 | 4.3c | 19.5bc | 26.6c | 28.4cd | 44.1ab | 0.1b | 4.2ab | 16.7ab | 39.5a | 69.3b |
T5 | 6.6b | 22.1bc | 25.4c | 36.3bc | 43.5ab | 0.1b | 3.3b | 16.2ab | 38.9a | 71.6b |
CK | 3.7c | 18.3c | 21.4c | 25.5d | 34.6b | 0.1b | 2.5b | 11.5b | 29.1b | 54.4c |
表4 不同有机液体肥处理下棉花干物质重的变化(g/株)
Tab.4 Changes of dry matter weight of cotton under different treatments(g/ plant)
条田号 Tiaoda | 地上营养器官干物质重(茎、叶) Dry matter weight of aboveground vegetative organs(stems,leaves) | 生殖器官干物质重(蕾、花、铃) Dry matter weight of reproductive organs(bud,flower,bell) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 盛花期 Full flowering stage | 盛铃期 Full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Later full boll stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | 盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 盛花期 Full flowering stage | 盛铃期 Full boll stage | 盛铃后期 Later full boll stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | |
T1 | 7.4b | 23.6b | 33.5b | 41.5ab | 50.5a | 0.1b | 3.1b | 16.6ab | 38.5a | 79.1b |
T2 | 5.0c | 21.5bc | 25.0c | 35.9bc | 43.4ab | 0.1b | 3.1b | 16.7ab | 37.1a | 71.0b |
T3 | 10.2a | 32.0a | 42.3a | 51.1a | 54.3a | 0.4a | 7.4a | 29.0a | 44.8a | 98.9a |
T4 | 4.3c | 19.5bc | 26.6c | 28.4cd | 44.1ab | 0.1b | 4.2ab | 16.7ab | 39.5a | 69.3b |
T5 | 6.6b | 22.1bc | 25.4c | 36.3bc | 43.5ab | 0.1b | 3.3b | 16.2ab | 38.9a | 71.6b |
CK | 3.7c | 18.3c | 21.4c | 25.5d | 34.6b | 0.1b | 2.5b | 11.5b | 29.1b | 54.4c |
条田号 Tiaoda | 单位面积株数 Per unit area plant No. (104/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll No.per plant | 总铃数 Total boll No. (104/hm2) | 单铃重 Boll mass (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 17.3±0.5 c | 4.5±0.4 b | 77.1±6.2 b | 6.5±0.6 a | 5 004 c |
T2 | 23.8± 0.4 ab | 4.6±0.3 b | 109.1±5.8 a | 5.8±0.3 bc | 6 322 b |
T3 | 16.9±0.6 c | 6.9±0.5 a | 117.1±4.4 a | 6.6±0.5 a | 7 682 a |
T4 | 21.3±1.4 b | 4.9±0.2 b | 105.7±6.1 a | 5.5±0.3 cd | 5 771 bc |
T5 | 25.1±1.2 a | 3.6±0.3 c | 91.2±5.0 b | 6.3±0.3 ab | 5 274 c |
CK | 22.7±2.7 ab | 4.7±0.4 b | 105.3±7.1 a | 4.9±0.6 d | 5 228 c |
表5 不同有机液体肥处理下棉花产量及产量构成因素变化
Tab.5 Cotton yield and yield components under different fertilizer treatments
条田号 Tiaoda | 单位面积株数 Per unit area plant No. (104/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll No.per plant | 总铃数 Total boll No. (104/hm2) | 单铃重 Boll mass (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 17.3±0.5 c | 4.5±0.4 b | 77.1±6.2 b | 6.5±0.6 a | 5 004 c |
T2 | 23.8± 0.4 ab | 4.6±0.3 b | 109.1±5.8 a | 5.8±0.3 bc | 6 322 b |
T3 | 16.9±0.6 c | 6.9±0.5 a | 117.1±4.4 a | 6.6±0.5 a | 7 682 a |
T4 | 21.3±1.4 b | 4.9±0.2 b | 105.7±6.1 a | 5.5±0.3 cd | 5 771 bc |
T5 | 25.1±1.2 a | 3.6±0.3 c | 91.2±5.0 b | 6.3±0.3 ab | 5 274 c |
CK | 22.7±2.7 ab | 4.7±0.4 b | 105.3±7.1 a | 4.9±0.6 d | 5 228 c |
条田号 Tiaoda | 上半部平均长度 Average length of upper half(mm) | 整齐度 Uniformity (%) | 马克隆值 Macron value | 断裂比强度 Specific strength at break(cN/tex) | 伸长率 Elongation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 29.6±1.2 b | 84.2±0.8 a | 4.4±0.4 c | 30.1±1.6 b | 6.8±0.1 b |
T2 | 27.3±0.8 cd | 82.9±1.2 b | 5.4±0.1 a | 27.7±1.7 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
T3 | 30.5±1.4 a | 84.4±0.7 a | 4.7±0.2 b | 32.9±1.5 a | 6.9±0.1 a |
T4 | 28.2±1.0 c | 83.1±1.1 b | 4.8±0.1 b | 28.9±1.4 bc | 6.7±0.1 c |
T5 | 27.5±0.4 cd | 82.9±1.2 b | 5.3±0.1 a | 27.9±1.0 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
CK | 27.1±0.4 cd | 82.8±1.2 b | 4.3±0.2 c | 28.6±1.0 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
表6 不同有机液体肥处理下棉花品质变化
Tab.6 Cotton quality under different fertilizer treatments
条田号 Tiaoda | 上半部平均长度 Average length of upper half(mm) | 整齐度 Uniformity (%) | 马克隆值 Macron value | 断裂比强度 Specific strength at break(cN/tex) | 伸长率 Elongation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 29.6±1.2 b | 84.2±0.8 a | 4.4±0.4 c | 30.1±1.6 b | 6.8±0.1 b |
T2 | 27.3±0.8 cd | 82.9±1.2 b | 5.4±0.1 a | 27.7±1.7 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
T3 | 30.5±1.4 a | 84.4±0.7 a | 4.7±0.2 b | 32.9±1.5 a | 6.9±0.1 a |
T4 | 28.2±1.0 c | 83.1±1.1 b | 4.8±0.1 b | 28.9±1.4 bc | 6.7±0.1 c |
T5 | 27.5±0.4 cd | 82.9±1.2 b | 5.3±0.1 a | 27.9±1.0 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
CK | 27.1±0.4 cd | 82.8±1.2 b | 4.3±0.2 c | 28.6±1.0 c | 6.6±0.1 c |
生育时期 Growth stage | 产量及其构成 Yield and components | 株高 Plant height | 主茎叶数 Leaf number of the main culm | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 叶倾角 Leaf angle | 地上营养器 官干物质重 Dry matter weight of aboveground nutrient organs | 地上生殖器 官干物质重 Dry matter weight of aboveground reproductive organs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 单位面积株数 | -0.225 | -0.327 | -0.354 | -0.424 | -0.794 | -0.624 |
总铃数 | 0.411 | 0.499 | 0.511 | -0.083 | 0.176 | 0.463 | |
单铃重 | 0.590 | 0.622 | 0.616 | 0.866* | 0.791 | 0.657 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.715 | 0.888* | 0.860* | 0.479 | 0.724 | 0.889* | |
P2 | 单位面积株数 | -0.061 | -0.097 | -0.168 | -0.497 | -0.757 | -0.585 |
总铃数 | 0.373 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.251 | 0.080 | 0.373 | |
单铃重 | 0.566 | 0.422 | 0.607 | 0.762 | 0.864* | 0.799 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.641 | 0.807 | 0.817* | 0.744 | 0.673 | 0.801 | |
P3 | 单位面积株数 | -0.105 | 0.300 | -0.219 | -0.300 | -0.709 | -0.659 |
总铃数 | 0.390 | 0.444 | 0.469 | 0.398 | -0.001 | 0.160 | |
单铃重 | 0.570 | -0.073 | 0.638 | 0.595 | 0.921** | 0.863 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.662 | 0.365 | 0.816* | 0.747 | 0.623 | 0.726 |
表7 测定参数与产量及产量构成的相关系数
Tab.7 Correlation coefficients between measured parameters and yield and yield composition
生育时期 Growth stage | 产量及其构成 Yield and components | 株高 Plant height | 主茎叶数 Leaf number of the main culm | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index | 叶倾角 Leaf angle | 地上营养器 官干物质重 Dry matter weight of aboveground nutrient organs | 地上生殖器 官干物质重 Dry matter weight of aboveground reproductive organs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 单位面积株数 | -0.225 | -0.327 | -0.354 | -0.424 | -0.794 | -0.624 |
总铃数 | 0.411 | 0.499 | 0.511 | -0.083 | 0.176 | 0.463 | |
单铃重 | 0.590 | 0.622 | 0.616 | 0.866* | 0.791 | 0.657 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.715 | 0.888* | 0.860* | 0.479 | 0.724 | 0.889* | |
P2 | 单位面积株数 | -0.061 | -0.097 | -0.168 | -0.497 | -0.757 | -0.585 |
总铃数 | 0.373 | 0.550 | 0.500 | 0.251 | 0.080 | 0.373 | |
单铃重 | 0.566 | 0.422 | 0.607 | 0.762 | 0.864* | 0.799 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.641 | 0.807 | 0.817* | 0.744 | 0.673 | 0.801 | |
P3 | 单位面积株数 | -0.105 | 0.300 | -0.219 | -0.300 | -0.709 | -0.659 |
总铃数 | 0.390 | 0.444 | 0.469 | 0.398 | -0.001 | 0.160 | |
单铃重 | 0.570 | -0.073 | 0.638 | 0.595 | 0.921** | 0.863 | |
籽棉产量 | 0.662 | 0.365 | 0.816* | 0.747 | 0.623 | 0.726 |
[1] | 郝先哲, 冯杨, 夏军, 等. 直播稀植高产杂交棉农艺及冠层结构特征研究[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(11):1801-1811. |
HAO Xianzhe, FENG Yang, XIA Jun, et al. Study on Characteristics of Agronomic and Canopy Structure of High Yield Hybrid Cotton With Direct Sowing and Sparse Planting[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(11):1801-1811. | |
[2] |
杨忠赞, 迟凤琴, 匡恩俊, 等. 有机肥替代对土壤理化性状及产量的综合评价[J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(S1):153-160.
DOI |
YANG Zhongzan, CHI Fengqin, KUANG Enjun, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Yield by Substitution of Organic Manure[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(S1):153-160. | |
[3] |
司转运, 高阳, 申孝军, 等. 水氮供应对夏棉产量、水氮利用及土壤硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12):3945-3954.
DOI |
SI Zhuanyun, GAO Yang, SHEN Xiaojun, et al. Effects of water nitrogen and irrigation water application on yield,water and nitrogen utilization and soil nitrate nitrogen accumulation in summer cotton[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(12):3945-3954.
DOI |
|
[4] | 欧霞. 新疆棉农施肥行为及低碳施肥意愿影响因素研究[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2022. |
OU Xia. Study on fertilization behavior and influencing factors of low carbon fertilization willingness of cotton farmers in Xinjiang[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2022. | |
[5] | 江玲, 孙雷. 新疆棉花生产中存在的问题分析[J]. 纺织报告, 2022, 41(8):26-28. |
JIANG Ling, SUN Lei. Analysis of problems in cotton production in Xinjiang[J]. Textile Reports, 2022, 41(8):26-28. | |
[6] |
王小武, 古丽努尔·艾合买提, 王志方, 等. 有机无机复混液体肥对棉花农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):770-778.
DOI |
WANG Xiaowu, Gulinuer Aihemaiti, WANG Zhifang, et al. Effects of organic and inorganic compound liquid fertilizer on agronomic characters and yield of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4):770-778.
DOI |
|
[7] |
王宁, 冯克云, 南宏宇, 等. 不同水分条件下有机无机肥配施对棉花根系特征及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(11):2187-2201.
DOI |
WANG Ning, FENG Keyun, NAN Hongyu, et al. Effects of Combined Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer on Root Characteristics and Yield of Cotton Under Different Water Conditions[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11):2187-2201.
DOI |
|
[8] | 殷彩云, 张华平, 肖春鸣, 等. 新疆阿拉尔垦区棉田水肥管理中存在的问题及思考[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2021, 44(1):36-38. |
YIN Caiyun, ZHANG Huaping, XIAO Chunming, et al. Problems and reflections on water and fertilizer management of cotton field in Aral Reclamation area of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2021, 44(1):36-38. | |
[9] | Muktamar Z, Sudjatmiko S, Chozin M, et al. Sweet Corn Performance and its Major Nutrient Uptake Following Application of Vermicompost Supplemented with Liquid Organic Fertilizer[J]. International Journal on Advanced Science,Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 7(2):602. |
[10] | 马燕, 郝先哲, 夏军, 等. 有机液体肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2020, 43(9):27-29. |
MA Yan, HAO Xianzhe, XIA Jun, et al. Effects of organic liquid fertilizer on growth and yield of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2020, 43(9):27-29. | |
[11] |
徐伟洲, 史雷, 王小林, 等. 甜高粱叶绿素荧光特性对生物有机液体混合肥的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(15):25-31.
DOI |
XU Weizhou, SHI Lei, WANG Xiaolin, et al. The Responses of Chlorophyll Fluorescence characteristics in Sweet Sorghum to Mixed liquid Organic Liquid Fertilizer[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(15):25-31.
DOI |
|
[12] | 李振华, 郑剑波, 张有亮, 等. 南疆棉田配施液体肥料对土壤酶活性养分的影响[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(13):103-106. |
LI Zhenhua, ZHENG Jianbo, ZHANG Youliang, et al. Effects of liquid fertilizer on soil enzyme active nutrients in cotton fields of southern Xinjiang[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2022, 42(13):103-106. | |
[13] | 阮革榕. 新疆有机哈密瓜生产关键技术研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2015. |
RUAN Gerong. Study on key technologies in the production of xinjiang hami melon[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2015. | |
[14] | 李天义, 田西京, 余智斌, 等. 塔河2号的生物学特性和生产表现及栽培技术[J]. 棉花科学, 2022, 44(4):36-39. |
LI Tianyi, TIAN Xijing, YU Zhibin, et al. Biological Characteristics and Production Performance and Cultivation Techniques of Tahe 2[J]. Cotton Science, 2022, 44(4):36-39. | |
[15] | 马燕. 有机液体肥对棉花农艺性状、光合生理及产量的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2021. |
MA Yan. Effects of Organic Liquid Fertilizer on Agronomic Traits,Photosynthetic Physiology and Yield of Cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2021. | |
[16] |
孙桂兰, 冯克云, 赵欣欣, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对棉花生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):762-769.
DOI |
SUN Guilan, FENG Keyun, ZHAO Xinxin, et al. Effects of Organic Manure Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on cotton Growth,Development and Yield[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4):762-769.
DOI |
|
[17] | Zhu L X, Liu L T, Sun H C, et al. Low nitrogen supply inhibits root growth but prolongs lateral root lifespan in cotton[J]. Industrial Crops & Products, 2022, 189:115733. |
[18] | 黄炳川, 杨莹攀, 龚珂宁, 等. 施用黄腐酸对不同盐渍化棉田滴灌棉花生理生长的影响[J]. 节水灌溉, 2022(6):37-43. |
HUANG Bingchuan, YANG Yingpan, GONG Kening, et al. Influences of Applying Fulvic Acid on Physiological Growth of Cotton under Drip Irrigation in Different Salinized Cotton Fields[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2022(6):37-43. | |
[19] | Hosamani V, Halepyati A, Chowdary R, et al. Response of bt cotton(Gossypium hirsutum) to macro nutrients and liquid fertilizers[J]. Bioinfolet - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences, 2013, 10:1319-1323. |
[20] | 张安琪, 郑春莲, 李宗毅, 等. 棉花成苗和幼苗生长对咸水滴灌的响应特征[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(10):16-22. |
ZHANG Anqi, ZHENG Chunlian, LI Zongyi, et al. Responsive Growth of Seedling and Matured Cotton to Drip Irrigation with Saline Water[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2018, 37(10):16-22. | |
[21] | 朱珠, 姚宝林, 李男, 等. 微咸水灌溉条件下土壤残膜对棉花出苗率与土壤盐分影响研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2021,(3):7-11. |
ZHU Zhu, YAO Baolin, LI Nan, et al. Effects of Soil Residual on Seedling Emergence Rate and Salinity of Cotton under Brackish Water Irrigation[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2021,(3):7-11. | |
[22] | 李鹏兵. 几种外源物质对棉花生长及产量形成影响的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020. |
LI Pengbing. Effects of Several Exogenous Substances on Cotton Growth and Yield Formation[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020. | |
[23] | 姚青青. 膜下滴灌水肥调控策略对棉花冠层结构及土壤硝态氮淋溶的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2012. |
YAO Qingqing. The Effects of Water and Fertilizer Regulation Strategy on Cotton Canopy Structure and Soil NO-3-N Leaching under Mulch-film Drip Irrigation[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2012. | |
[24] | Liang Q, Shi X J, Li N N, et al. Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Organic Liquid Fertilizer Improved Canopy Structure and Function and Increased Cotton Yield[J]. Agronomy, 2022,12,1759. |
[25] | 栾桂林, 邹德乙, 崔玉珍, 等. 高效液体肥对作物产量和品质的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1996, 27(4):68-73. |
LUAN Guilin, ZOU Deyi, CUI Yuzhen, et al. Effects of Application of High-effective Liquid Fertilizer on Crop Yield and Quality[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 1996, 27(4):68-73. | |
[26] | 郝先哲. 有机液体肥施用量对棉花产量及养分利用效率的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2021. |
HAO Xianzhe. Effects of Organic Liquid Fertilizer Application Rate on Cotton Yield and Nutrient Utilization Efficiency[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2021. | |
[27] |
Abdelraheem A, Adams N, Zhang J F. Effects of drought on agronomic and fiber quality in an introgressed backcross inbred line population of Upland cotton under field conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 254:107850.
DOI URL |
[28] |
李茂春, 胡云喜, 练文明, 等. 2021年6月新疆棉花长势和中后期管理意见[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(7):41-43.
DOI |
LI Maochun, HU Yunxi, LIAN Wenming, et al. The advice for the mid-late period cotton management based on its growth in June 2021 in Xinjian[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(7):41-43.
DOI |
[1] | 王凯迪, 高晨旭, 裴文锋, 杨书贤, 张文庆, 宋吉坤, 马建江, 王莉, 于霁雯, 陈全家. 陆地棉TRM基因家族的鉴定及纤维品质相关优异单倍型分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 521-536. |
[2] | 孙明辉, 叶尔兰·木合塔尔, 翟梦华, 李雪瑞, 徐新龙, 张巨松. 不同种植模式和品种对棉花光合物质生产及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 537-546. |
[3] | 张俊尧, 王家勇, 唐江华, 娄善伟, 李文珊, 徐文修, 孟令贻, 何洪涛, 桑军民. 播期与密度双因素对陆地棉生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 547-555. |
[4] | 党旭伟, 林馨园, 贺正, 陈燕, 慈宝霞, 马学花, 郭晨荔, 贺亚星, 刘扬, 马富裕. 基于无人机热红外遥感图像提取滴灌棉花冠层温度及精度评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 565-575. |
[5] | 梁其干, 张浩, 胡国智, 陈积豪, 冯烔鑫, 曹庆, 王敏, 符小发, 闫淼, 高强, 张学军, 周勃, 王豪杰. 施肥调控对设施甜瓜生长与产量、品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 599-606. |
[6] | 聂芳, 琚艳君, 陈卓雅, 刘敏, 刘河疆, 刘志虎, 开建荣, 苟春林, 赵多勇. 枸杞营养品质时空变化规律及特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 642-651. |
[7] | 鲜欧洋, 李肖, 陈永成, 王挺, 王旭哲, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 糖蜜和植物乳杆菌对啤酒花枝叶青贮品质、微生物数量及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 719-726. |
[8] | 杨茂琪, 侯振安, 闵伟. 压差式和泵吸式施肥装置对棉花产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 271-278. |
[9] | 吴刚, 田阳青, 赵强, 李欣欣, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 张家豪, 王文庆, 占东霞, 马春梅. 缩节胺复配不同促进剂对棉花棉铃时空分布和光合特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 279-287. |
[10] | 毛廷勇, 刘婵, 杨北方, 李亚兵, 周均, 王栋, 陈国栋, 万素梅. 滴灌棉花源库器官对化学打顶的响应特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 288-299. |
[11] | 惠瑞晗, 林丽, 曹伟, 张梦珂, 林豪, 姚帅. 基于P-M模型的棉田智能灌溉系统的设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 300-309. |
[12] | 高新, 汪烨霖, 朱泰武, 李剑峰, 王重, 时佳, 王春生, 张宏芝, 王立红, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 不同施氮量对春小麦灌浆速率和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 310-317. |
[13] | 王季姣, 潘越, 王世伟, 韩政伟, 马勇, 虎海防, 王宝庆. 土壤养分与北冰红山葡萄果实品质间的典型相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 355-364. |
[14] | 王贺亚, 罗静静, 王康, 王瑞楠, 王旭, 高光瑞, 房艳. 不同微生物菌剂对甜菜根腐病的防效及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 448-454. |
[15] | 马辉, 罗单, 李星星, 田立文, 戴路, 欧欢, 艾麦尔江·阿布力提甫, 阿孜古丽·阿布力孜, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力. 化学封顶对不同果枝数棉田株型和产量的影响及其评价指标的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 261-270. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||