新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 1378-1385.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.06.010
• 作物遗传育种种质资源分子遗传学耕作栽培生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
赵云1(), 冯国郡1(), 古丽扎提·巴孜尔别克2, 胡相伟1, 苏比努尔·卡德尔2, 李鹏兵3, 邵疆4, 刘杰4
收稿日期:
2023-10-29
出版日期:
2024-06-20
发布日期:
2024-08-08
通信作者:
冯国郡(1970-),女,新疆奇台人,研究员,博士生,研究方向为杂粮育种及栽培,(E-mail)fengguojxj@126.com作者简介:
赵云(1992-),男,新疆奇台人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为谷子育种及栽培,(E-mail)1041912942@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHAO Yun1(), FENG Guojun1(), Gulizhati Bazierbieke2, HU Xiangwei1, Subinuer Kadeer2, LI Pengbing3, SHAO Jiang4, LIU Jie4
Received:
2023-10-29
Published:
2024-06-20
Online:
2024-08-08
Correspondence author:
FENG Guojun (1970-), female, from Qitai, Xinjiang, doctoral student, researcher, research direction: breeding and cultivation of miscellaneous grains, (E-mail) fengguojxj@126.comSupported by:
摘要:
【目的】分析新疆北疆谷子适宜钾肥用量及对其生长发育的影响,为新疆北疆生态区春播谷子高产栽培提供理论依据。【方法】以豫谷18号为试材,设5种钾肥用量(0、75、150、225、300 kg/hm2)的大田试验。测定谷子干物质含量积累、叶绿素含量、节间充实度、农艺性状及产量等指标。【结果】随着施钾量的增加,各农艺指标呈现单峰曲线变化,K225处理为峰值,株高、穗长、穗粗、茎基粗、叶长及叶宽相比K0处理显著增加8.1%、26.1%、20.9%、22.6%、12.9%及9.4%。与对照(0 kg/hm2)相比,施钾处理使豫谷18号显著增产1.2%~6.4%,钾肥用量 225 kg/hm2处理产量最高,为7 891.1 kg/hm2。与对照(0 kg/hm2)相比,花后各时期的叶绿素含量显著增加,呈先增加后下降的趋势,在K225处理下达到峰值。干物质含量积累随生育期的延长呈“J”型曲线变化,干物质含量积累速率呈单峰曲线变化,最大积累速率在抽穗期-齐穗期达到顶峰。【结论】适量钾肥施入,对新疆北疆地区谷子生长发育影响显著,K225处理为新疆谷子钾肥最佳施用量。
中图分类号:
赵云, 冯国郡, 古丽扎提·巴孜尔别克, 胡相伟, 苏比努尔·卡德尔, 李鹏兵, 邵疆, 刘杰. 钾肥用量对滴灌谷子生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1378-1385.
ZHAO Yun, FENG Guojun, Gulizhati Bazierbieke, HU Xiangwei, Subinuer Kadeer, LI Pengbing, SHAO Jiang, LIU Jie. Effects of potassium fertilizer dosage on growth and yield of drip irrigated millet in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1378-1385.
处理 Treatments | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear thickness (mm) | 茎粗 Stem thickness (mm) | 主茎节数 Number of main stem segments(个) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Blade width ( cm ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 145.3c | 23.4c | 24.4c | 9.3b | 14a | 38.3b | 2.8b |
K75 | 147.3a | 25.3b | 28.7b | 10.0a | 14a | 42.0a | 3.2a |
K150 | 151.5a | 28.2a | 29.1a | 10.5a | 14a | 45.2a | 3.4a |
K225 | 151.6a | 29.5a | 29.7a | 11.4a | 14a | 45.5a | 3.5a |
K300 | 149.9b | 26.2b | 28.5b | 11.6a | 15a | 44.1a | 3.2a |
表1 不同钾肥水平下谷子农艺性状的变化
Tab.1 Changes of agronomic characters of millet under different potassium fertilizer levels
处理 Treatments | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear thickness (mm) | 茎粗 Stem thickness (mm) | 主茎节数 Number of main stem segments(个) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Blade width ( cm ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 145.3c | 23.4c | 24.4c | 9.3b | 14a | 38.3b | 2.8b |
K75 | 147.3a | 25.3b | 28.7b | 10.0a | 14a | 42.0a | 3.2a |
K150 | 151.5a | 28.2a | 29.1a | 10.5a | 14a | 45.2a | 3.4a |
K225 | 151.6a | 29.5a | 29.7a | 11.4a | 14a | 45.5a | 3.5a |
K300 | 149.9b | 26.2b | 28.5b | 11.6a | 15a | 44.1a | 3.2a |
处理 Treatments | 穗数 Panicle number (株/hm2 ) | 单穗重 Panicle weight (g) | 单穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 60.5b | 20.8b | 16.6b | 7 418.2c | / |
K75 | 65.5b | 22.4b | 17.9b | 7 507.1b | 1.2 |
K150 | 71.8a | 26.5a | 19.7b | 7 607.1b | 2.5 |
K225 | 74.4a | 28.8a | 22.6a | 7 891.1a | 6.4 |
K300 | 74.3a | 28.2a | 22.1a | 7 840.1a | 5.7 |
表2 不同钾肥水平下谷子产量及其构成因素
Tab.2 Millet yield and its component factors under different potassium fertilizer levels
处理 Treatments | 穗数 Panicle number (株/hm2 ) | 单穗重 Panicle weight (g) | 单穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle(g) | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K0 | 60.5b | 20.8b | 16.6b | 7 418.2c | / |
K75 | 65.5b | 22.4b | 17.9b | 7 507.1b | 1.2 |
K150 | 71.8a | 26.5a | 19.7b | 7 607.1b | 2.5 |
K225 | 74.4a | 28.8a | 22.6a | 7 891.1a | 6.4 |
K300 | 74.3a | 28.2a | 22.1a | 7 840.1a | 5.7 |
品种 Varieties | 处理 Treatments | 穗干重 Dry ear weight(g/株) | 叶干重 Leaf dry weight(g/株) | 茎鞘干重 Stem sheath dry weight(g/株) | 运转量 Running capacity(g/株) | 运转量 Running capacity(%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘 Stem sheath | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘 Stem sheath | ||
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | K0 | 2.9 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 7.3 | -0.4 | -0.7 | -5.5 | -9.6 |
K75 | 3.0 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 9.8 | -0.3 | -0.9 | -3.1 | -9.2 | |
K150 | 3.5 | 13.7 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 5.8 | 10.2 | -0.3 | -0.8 | -2.9 | -7.8 | |
K225 | 4.4 | 14.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 6.1 | 9.6 | -0.1 | -1.3 | -1.0 | -13.5 | |
K300 | 4.5 | 15.5 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 11 | -0.5 | -1 | -4.2 | -9.1 |
表3 不同施钾水平下谷子干物质量分配的变化
Tab.3 Changes of different potassium application level on dry matter allocation of millet
品种 Varieties | 处理 Treatments | 穗干重 Dry ear weight(g/株) | 叶干重 Leaf dry weight(g/株) | 茎鞘干重 Stem sheath dry weight(g/株) | 运转量 Running capacity(g/株) | 运转量 Running capacity(%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 抽穗期 Heading time | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 穗 Ear | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘 Stem sheath | 叶 Leaf | 茎鞘 Stem sheath | ||
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | K0 | 2.9 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 5.7 | 5.0 | 7.3 | -0.4 | -0.7 | -5.5 | -9.6 |
K75 | 3.0 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 9.8 | -0.3 | -0.9 | -3.1 | -9.2 | |
K150 | 3.5 | 13.7 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 6.6 | 5.8 | 10.2 | -0.3 | -0.8 | -2.9 | -7.8 | |
K225 | 4.4 | 14.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 7.4 | 6.1 | 9.6 | -0.1 | -1.3 | -1.0 | -13.5 | |
K300 | 4.5 | 15.5 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 11 | -0.5 | -1 | -4.2 | -9.1 |
品种 Varieties | 处理 Treatments | 节间长Internode length | 节间鲜重Fresh internode weight | 充实度Fullness degree | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3 section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | 倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3 section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | 倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | ||
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | K0 | 6.83 | 8.23 | 8.36 | 8.64 | 9.68 | 3.16 | 3.28 | 3.48 | 3.94 | 4.24 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.44 |
K75 | 7.09 | 8.32 | 8.43 | 9.36 | 10.52 | 3.34 | 3.58 | 3.60 | 4.68 | 5.02 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.48 | |
K150 | 7.40 | 8.52 | 8.90 | 9.52 | 10.10 | 3.52 | 3.76 | 3.76 | 4.71 | 4.96 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.49 | |
K225 | 7.58 | 8.69 | 9.10 | 9.60 | 10.10 | 4.32 | 4.66 | 4.72 | 5.04 | 5.23 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.52 | |
K300 | 7.46 | 8.62 | 8.94 | 9.23 | 9.36 | 4.16 | 4.48 | 4.58 | 4.69 | 4.80 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
表4 不同施钾水平下谷子植株茎秆节间特性的变化
Tab.4 Changes of potassium application level on stem internode characteristics of millet plants
品种 Varieties | 处理 Treatments | 节间长Internode length | 节间鲜重Fresh internode weight | 充实度Fullness degree | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3 section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | 倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3 section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | 倒2节 Inverted 2 section | 倒3节 Inverted 3section | 倒4节 Inverted 4 section | 倒5节 Inverted 5 section | 倒6节 Inverted 6 section | ||
豫谷18号 Yugu 18 | K0 | 6.83 | 8.23 | 8.36 | 8.64 | 9.68 | 3.16 | 3.28 | 3.48 | 3.94 | 4.24 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.44 |
K75 | 7.09 | 8.32 | 8.43 | 9.36 | 10.52 | 3.34 | 3.58 | 3.60 | 4.68 | 5.02 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.48 | |
K150 | 7.40 | 8.52 | 8.90 | 9.52 | 10.10 | 3.52 | 3.76 | 3.76 | 4.71 | 4.96 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.49 | |
K225 | 7.58 | 8.69 | 9.10 | 9.60 | 10.10 | 4.32 | 4.66 | 4.72 | 5.04 | 5.23 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.52 | |
K300 | 7.46 | 8.62 | 8.94 | 9.23 | 9.36 | 4.16 | 4.48 | 4.58 | 4.69 | 4.80 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.51 |
[1] | 贾冠清, 刁现民. 谷子(Setaria italica(L.) P.Beauv.)作为功能基因组研究模式植物的发展现状及趋势[J]. 生命科学, 2017, 29(3): 292-301. |
JIA Guanqing, DIAO Xianmin. Current status and perspectives of researches on foxtail millet(Setaria italica(L.) P. Beauv.): a potential model of plant functional genomics studies[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 2017, 29(3): 292-301. | |
[2] | 李顺国, 刘斐, 刘猛, 等. 我国谷子产区分布、市场动态及前景展望[C]. 全国杂粮大会, 2014. |
LI Shunguo, LIU Fei, LIU Meng, et al. Distribution, market dynamics and prospects of millet producing areas in China[C]. National Cereals Conference, 2014. | |
[3] | 张延磊, 瞿国文. 谷子北疆灰漠高产栽培技术[J]. 农家参谋, 2020,(6): 44. |
ZHANG Yanlei, QU Guowen. High-yield cultivation techniques of millet in grey desert in northern Xinjiang[J]. The Farmers Consultant, 2020,(6): 44. | |
[4] | Fatoumata C, Jean-Paul B, Charles T, et al. Valorization of orange zest by lactic fermentation to increase the nutritional value of millet products in Cote d’Ivoire[J]. Advances in Research, 2017, 11(1): 1-11. |
[5] | 王晓军, 王勇, 张晓娟, 等. 氮磷钾平衡施肥对谷子产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 农业科学研究, 2015, 36(2): 5-8, 26. |
WANG Xiaojun, WANG Yong, ZHANG Xiaojuan, et al. Influence of balanced N, P, K fertilization on millet yield and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 36(2): 5-8, 26. | |
[6] | 代小冬, 徐心志, 朱灿灿, 等. 谷子氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016,(5): 147-151. |
DAI Xiaodong, XU Xinzhi, ZHU Cancan, et al. Study on the effects of N P K fertilizer in foxtail millet[J]. Crops, 2016,(5): 147-151. | |
[7] |
Buck A, Gucker P M, Sch nb chler R D, et al. Evaluation of serotonergic transporters using PET and[11C](+)McN-5652: assessment of methods[J]. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2000, 20(2): 253-262.
PMID |
[8] |
李永虎, 曹梦琳, 杜慧玲, 等. 施肥位置及施肥量对杂交谷子干物质累积、转运和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 4177-4190.
DOI |
LI Yonghu, CAO Menglin, DU Huiling, et al. Effect of fertilization location and amount on dry matter accumulation, translocation and yield of hybrid millet[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(22): 4177-4190.
DOI |
|
[9] | Hasan, Rashid M, Rahman Q, et al. Influence of seed rates and levels of NPK fertilizers on dry matter accumulations and yield performance of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L. Beauv.)[J]. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 2014, 38: 689-704. |
[10] | 朱钦钦, 朱国立, 莫德乐吐, 等. 钾肥用量对蓖麻产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(3): 232-235, 276. |
ZHU Qinqin, ZHU Guoli, MO Deletu, et al. Effects of potash fertilizer on the production and photosynthetic characteristics of Castor[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Natural Sciences), 2018, 33(3): 232-235, 276. | |
[11] | 宋淑贤, 田伯红, 王建广, 等. 不同施钾量对谷子生长及产量的影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2015,(6): 6-8. |
SONG Shuxian, TIAN Bohong, WANG Janguang, et al. Effect of potassium fertilization on the growth and yield of millet[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2015,(6): 6-8. | |
[12] | 于小晶, 田晓飞, 张民, 等. 控释氮肥和控释钾肥对棉花产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019, 36(3): 313-321. |
YU Xiaojing, TIAN Xiaofei, ZHANG Min, et al. Effects of controlled-release nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on cotton yield, fiber quality and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019, 36(3): 313-321. | |
[13] | 宋慧, 王涛, 闫宏山, 等. 不同类型谷子品种(系)光合性能、干物质积累转运和籽粒灌浆特性对产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(7): 58-72. |
SONG Hui, WANG Tao, YAN Hongshan, et al. Study on the relationship between the photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation, grain filling parameter and yield of different genotypes foxtail millet cultivars/lines[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2022, 27(7): 58-72. | |
[14] | 薛香, 吴玉娥. 小麦叶片叶绿素含量测定及其与SPAD值的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(11): 2701-2702, 2751. |
XUE Xiang, WU Yu’e. Chlorophyll content determination and its relationship with SPAD value in wheat[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49(11): 2701-2702, 2751. | |
[15] | 赵爱宣, 次旦卓嘎, 谭畅, 等. 硅肥对青稞品系“5171-7” 茎秆抗倒相关性状的影响[J]. 高原农业, 2022, 6(1): 11-15, 54. |
ZHAO Aixuan, CIDANZHUOGA, TAN Chang, et al. Effects of silicon fertilizer on lodging resistance of highland barley 5171-7 stem[J]. Journal of Plateau Agriculture, 2022, 6(1): 11-15, 54. | |
[16] |
米晓田, 石磊, 何刚, 等. 陕西省小农户作物生产的减肥潜力及经济效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.
DOI |
MI Xiaotian, SHI Lei, HE Gang, et al. Fertilizer reduction potential and economic benefits of crop production for smallholder farmers in Shaanxi Province[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.
DOI |
|
[17] | 王强盛, 丁艳锋, 朱艳, 等. 不同基因型水稻钾素吸收利用对施钾量的生理响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(4): 190-194, 199. |
WANG Qiangsheng, DING Yanfeng, ZHU Yan, et al. Physiological response of potassium absorption and utilization of different genotypes rice to potassium application rates[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(4): 190-194, 199. | |
[18] | 郝科星, 李娜娜, 候富恩. 氮·磷·钾肥运筹对谷子品质与产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(13): 51-55.(与25重复) |
HAO Kexing, LI Nana, HOU Fuen. P, K fertilizer management on the quality and yield of millet[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(13): 51-55. | |
[19] | 李玉影, 金继运, 刘双全, 等. 钾对春小麦生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005, 11(4): 449-455. |
LI Yuying, JIN Jiyun, LIU Shuangquan, et al. Effects of potassium on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of spring wheat[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2005, 11(4): 449-455. | |
[20] |
张亚琦, 李淑文, 杜雄, 等. 施钾对杂交谷子水分利用效率和产量的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37(6): 1-6.
DOI |
ZHANG Yaqi, LI Shuwen, DU Xiong, et al. Effect of potassium fertilization on water use efficiency and yield of hybrid millet[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2014, 37(6): 1-6.
DOI |
|
[21] | 罗一鸣, 肖立中, 潘圣刚, 等. 钾肥对香稻香气及稻米品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(3): 1147-1153. |
LUO Yiming, XIAO Lizhong, PAN Shenggang, et al. Effects of potassium fertilizer on aroma and quality of aromatic rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(3): 1147-1153. | |
[22] |
张玉屏, 曹卫星, 朱德峰, 等. 红壤稻田钾肥施用量对超级稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6): 633-638.
DOI |
ZHANG Yuping, CAO Weixing, ZHU Defeng, et al. Effects of potassium fertilizer rate on growth and yield formation of super high yielding rice in red paddy soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23(6): 633-638.
DOI |
|
[23] | Jenkins M B, Truman C C, Franklin D H, et al. Fecal bacterial losses in runoff from conventional and no-till pearl millet fertilized with broiler litter[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 134: 38-41. |
[24] | 陈二影, 秦岭, 程炳文, 等. 夏谷氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(1): 61-65. |
CHEN Erying, QIN Ling, CHENG Bingwen, et al. Application effect of N, P, K fertilizers on summer foxtail millet[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(1): 61-65. | |
[25] | 纪明雪, 张智勇, 齐冰洁, 等. 燕麦种质资源抗倒伏及生物学性状的差异评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(4): 453-462. |
JI Mingxue, ZHANG Zhiyong, QI Bingjie, et al. Evaluation of lodging resistance and difference of biological characters of oat germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2023, 43(4): 453-462. | |
[26] | 周海宇, 江禹奉, 杨明冲, 等. 玉米茎秆强度与维管束数目及纤维含量的关系和评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(6): 1636-1643. |
ZHOU Haiyu, JIANG Yufeng, YANG Mingchong, et al. Relationship and evaluation of stalk strength, vascular bundle and fiber content in maize[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(6): 1636-1643. | |
[27] | Liu W G, Deng Y C, Hussain S, et al. Relationship between cellulose accumulation and lodging resistance in the stem of relay intercropped soybean[Glycine max (L.) Merr.[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 196: 261-267. |
[1] | 杨梅, 赵红梅, 迪丽热巴·夏米西丁, 杨卫君, 张金汕, 惠超. 氮肥减量配施生物质炭对春小麦群体结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[2] | 鲁伟丹, 周远航, 马小龙, 高江龙, 樊晓琴, 郭建富, 李健强, 林明. 不同比例有机肥替代化肥对甜菜植株养分及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1631-1639. |
[3] | 高君, 侯献飞, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 汪天玲, 黄奕, 陈晓露, 李强. 棉花-花生轮作模式对花生干物质积累量分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1648-1656. |
[4] | 侯献飞, 李强, 苗昊翠, 贾东海, 顾元国, 买买提依明·斯马依, 崔福洋. 棉花-花生轮作模式对土壤养分及其产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665. |
[5] | 马百幻, 赵强, 谢佳, 徐开玥, 任若飞, 宋兴虎. 生物药剂复配对棉花黄萎病防治及生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1748-1756. |
[6] | 马勇, 刘慧, 高红梅, 康雪, 马春晖. 不同氮素水平下紫花苜蓿与多年生黑麦草混播对其产量和营养品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1793-1804. |
[7] | 刘跃, 贾永红, 张金汕, 于月华, 王润琪, 李丹丹, 石书兵. 滴灌条件下不同高油酸花生品种比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367. |
[8] | 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班, 潘竟海, 陈友强, 刘华君, 董心久, 白晓山, 李思忠, 高卫时, 沙红, 李小惠. 基于产量相关性状综合评价晚播甜菜品种的适应性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377. |
[9] | 刘富余, 张江辉, 白云岗, 赵经华, 曹彪. 基于Meta法定量分析亏缺灌溉作物产量及水分利用效率[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1487-1496. |
[10] | 张宏芝, 王立红, 时佳, 孔德鹏, 王重, 高新, 李剑峰, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 土壤水分对不同抗旱性春小麦品种叶片保护性酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
[11] | 王润琪, 贾永红, 王玉娇, 刘跃, 李丹丹, 董艳雪, 古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪, 张路路, 张金汕, 石书兵. 不同滴灌量对匀播冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1048-1056. |
[12] | 谢忠, 叶含春, 王振华, 李海强, 刘健, 陈睿, 许宇双. 浅埋滴灌水氮配施对冬小麦生长发育、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1057-1066. |
[13] | 张钊, 张贵龙, 汤秋香, 闫雪影, 张艳军. 有机无机肥配施对潮土麦田肥力和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1067-1076. |
[14] | 李雪瑞, 翟梦华, 徐新龙, 孙明辉, 张巨松. 无人机喷施不同浓度缩节胺对棉花生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1085-1093. |
[15] | 董祯林, 万素梅, 熊世武, 马云珍, 毛廷勇, 杨北方, 骆磊, 刘超群, 陈国栋, 李亚兵. 不同种植密度对中棉113农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1102-1111. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||