不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.007

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (8): 1883-1887.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.007

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较

刘旭欢¹(), 于姗², 刘跃², 石书兵²()

1.新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术协会,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业大学研究生院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-09-19
通信作者: 石书兵(1966-),男,山东人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为小麦高产栽培,(E-mail)shbshi@sina.com
作者简介:刘旭欢(1988-),女,新疆呼图壁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物栽培与耕作,(E-mail)472543919@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划项目“春小麦高活力种子关键技术研究与示范”(XJEDU20211011)

Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes

LIU Xuhuan¹(), YU Shan², LIU Yue², SHI Shubing²()

1. Association of Science and Technology of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Graduate School, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2024-02-02 Published:2024-08-20 Online:2024-09-19
Correspondence author: SHI Shubing(1966-),male,from Shandong, professor,Doctoral supervisor,research direction: the research of high-yield cultivation of wheat, (E-mail)shbshi@sina.com
Supported by:
The University R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Research and Demonstration of the Key Technology of High-Vigor Seed in Spring Wheat(XJEDU20211011)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同粒级春小麦品种间、粒级间种子活力的差异。【方法】采用3种不同的种子活力简易指数计算方法,分析新春29号、新春34号、新春11号、新春30号等4个当季收获品种大粒、小粒2个粒级的种子活力。【结果】不同品种间种子活力均达到了极显著性差异,相同品种中的大粒种子与小粒种子间呈极显著性差异,但不同品种间的大粒、小粒种子活力大小排序并不一致。【结论】春小麦不同品种种子活力高低不仅要依据种子活力指数计算方式,还要根据其农艺性状或生理生化特性进行综合判定;同一品种春小麦种子,体积大、千粒重高则表现出较高的活力,不同品种种子体积的大小和千粒重的高低与种子活力高低并无较一致关系,因此不能仅依靠单一的指标判定种子活力的高低。

关键词: 春小麦; 种子大小; 种子活力

Abstract:

【Objective】 Study on the differences in seed vitality between different grain sizes of spring wheat varieties and grainsizes.【Methods】 The purpose of the study is to determine the differ by using 3 kinds of calculation methods on varieties and sizes spring wheat. 【Results】 The results showed that when using different calculation methods for the calculation of different varieties of seed vigor, the results were very significantly different; The ranking of seed vigor size was also inconsistent between different varieties; In addition, when the calculation methods were used to calculate the seed vigor, differences were shown between large seeds and small ones in different varieties. Therefore, the comparison of seed vigor of different spring wheat varieties should not be only based on the calculation method of seed vigor index, but also according to the comprehensive agronomic characters and physiological and biochemical characteristics to make the judgment. 【Conclusion】 Spring wheat seeds of the same variety which have large size and high 1000 grain weight show high vigor. There is no obvious relationship between the seed size and 1000 seed weight of different varieties and the seed vigor, so the seed vigor cannot be determined by a single index. The same varieties, large size or high grain spring wheat seeds, its energy is higher, different varieties, the size of the volume and level of high and low and seed vigor and has no obvious relation, so we can't just rely on a single index to determining the seed vigor

Key words: spring wheat; seed sizes; seed vigor

中图分类号:

S512.12

刘旭欢, 于姗, 刘跃, 石书兵. 不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887.

LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887.

图/表 5

参考文献 25

[1]	Gan Y T, Stobbe E H, Moes J. Relative date of wheat seedling emergence and its impact on grain yield[J]. Crop Science, 1992, 32(5): 1275-1281.
[2]	Rao SKInfluence of seed size on field germination, seedling vigor, yield and quantity of self-pollinated crop: A review[J]. Agricultural Review, 1981, 2:95-101.
[3]	Benjamin L R. Variation in time of seedling emergence within populations: a feature that determines individual growth and development[M]//Advances in Agronomy Volume 44. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990: 1-25.
[4]	Koger C H, Reddy K N, Poston D H. Factors affecting seed germination, seedling emergence, and survival of texasweed (Caperonia palustris)[J]. Weed Science, 2004, 52(6): 989-995.
[5]	柯文山, 钟章成, 席红安, 等. 四川大头茶地理种群种子大小变异及对萌发、幼苗特征的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(4): 697-701.
	KE Wenshan, ZHONG Zhangcheng, XI Hongan, et al. The variation of seed sizes of Gordonia acuminata geographic populations and its effect on seed germination and seedling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20(4): 697-701.
[6]	Liu W D, Cui J M, Wang H C. Effects of seed size on winter wheat seedling and its young-spike development[J]. Seed, 2004, 23(3):33-35.
[7]	Turk M A, Taw A R M, Lee K D. Seed germination and seedling growth of three lentil cultivars under moisture stress[J]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2004, 3(3): 394-397.
[8]	张世挺, 杜国祯, 陈家宽, 等. 不同营养条件下24种高寒草甸菊科植物种子重量对幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(9): 1737-1744.
	ZHANG Shiting, DU Guozhen, CHEN Jiakuan, et al. Effects of seed weight on seedling growth under different nutrient conditions in twenty-four species of Compositae in an Alpine Meadow[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(9): 1737-1744.
[9]	Swanborough P, Westoby M. Seedling relative growth rate and its components in relation to seed size: phylogenetically independent contrasts[J]. Functional Ecology, 1996, 10(2): 176.
[10]	郭陞垚, 陈剑洪, 王金线, 等. 花生种子大小对产量及品质的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, 27(7): 700-706.
	GUO Shengyao, CHEN Jianhong, WANG Jinxian, et al. Effects of seed size on yield and quality of peanuts[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 27(7): 700-706.
[11]	李孟良. 油菜不同部位粒重差异及种子活力研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6): 284-287.
	LI Mengliang. Study on the difference of grain weight and seed vigor among the different parts of the rape[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(6): 284-287. DOI
[12]	石海春, 柯永培, 刘帆, 等. 不同大小的玉米种子活力差异比较研究[J]. 种子, 2005, 24(4): 37-39.
	SHI Haichun, KE Yongpei, LIU Fan, et al. Comparative study on the difference of vigor of maize seeds with different sizes[J]. Seed, 2005, 24(4): 37-39.
[13]	Shao M. Study on the seed weight and seed seize variation pattern and their biological sinificance in Podophylloideae (Berberidaceae)[J]. Seed, 1999.
[14]	Qin D H. The external morphology and seed vigor[J]. Seed, 1989, 1:7-9.
[15]	Zhao S J, Shi G A, Dong X C. Plant physiology experiment instruction[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002,47-55.
[16]	Tang R H, Fu Q Z. The influence of germination potential, germination rate and seedling quality on melon seed size[J]. Seed, 1997, 6:57-58.
[17]	Green P T, Juniper P A. Seed-seedling allometry in tropical rain forest trees: seed mass-related patterns of resource allocation and the ‘reserve effect’[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2004, 92(3): 397-408.
[18]	Westby M, Leishman M, Lord J. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 1996, 351:1309-1318.
[19]	Zhang B H, Hao X, Li Y K,etal. The seed vigor and its measuring method[J]. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2006, 6:86-87.
[20]	Gu Z H, Xu B M, Zheng G H. Determination method of seed vigor of germination physiological measurement (Ⅱ)[J]. Seed, 1982, 3:12-17.
[21]	高伟娜, 顾小清, 乔晓岚, 等. 高压静电场对老化水稻种子活力的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2007, 16(2): 37-40.
	GAO Weina, GU Xiaoqing, QIAO Xiaolan, et al. Effect of HVEF on the seed vigor of aging rice seeds[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2007, 16(2): 37-40.
[22]	Wu G L, Du G Z. Relationships between seed size and seedling growth strategy of herbaceous plant: a review[J]. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao = the Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(1): 191-197.
[23]	Jakobsson A, Eriksson O. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants[J]. Oikos, 2000, 88(3): 494-502.
[24]	Wu G, Chen M, Zhou X, et al. Response of morphological plasticity of three herbaceous seedlings to light and nutrition in the qing-Hai Tibetan Plateau[J]. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2006, 5(4): 635-642.
[25]	Vaughton G, Ramsey M. Sources and consequences of seed mass variation in Banksia marginata (Proteaceae)[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86(4): 563-573.

活力指数 Vitality index	品种 Cultivar	平均数 Mean	5%差异 Significance of difference at 0.05 level	1%差异 Significance of difference at 0.01 level
C₁	B₁	96.81	a	A
	B₂	96.54	a	A
	B₄	94.91	a	A
	B₃	94.61	a	A
C₂	B₂	13.33	a	A
	B₄	12.92	a	A
	B₁	12.68	a	AB
	B₃	11.83	b	B
C₃	B₃	15.38	a	A
	B₂	15.26	a	A
	B₄	14.67	b	B
	B₁	14.11	c	C

活力指数 Vitality index	品种 Cultivar	平均数 Mean	5%差异 Significance of difference at 0.05 level	1%差异 Significance of difference at 0.01 level
C₁	B₁	96.81	a	A
	B₂	96.54	a	A
	B₄	94.91	a	A
	B₃	94.61	a	A
C₂	B₂	13.33	a	A
	B₄	12.92	a	A
	B₁	12.68	a	AB
	B₃	11.83	b	B
C₃	B₃	15.38	a	A
	B₂	15.26	a	A
	B₄	14.67	b	B
	B₁	14.11	c	C

活力指数 Vitality index	组合 Cross	平均数 Mean	5%差异 Significance of difference at 0.05 level	1%差异 Significance of difference at 0.01 level
C₁	B₁×A₁	136.76	a	A
	B₂A₁	127.20	a	A
	B₃A₁	106.24	b	B
	B₄A₁	102.83	b	B
	B₂A₂	92.28	c	BC
	B₁A₂	92.19	c	BC
	B₄A₂	85.90	c	C
	B₃A₂	85.51	c	C
C₂	B₂A₁	15.86	a	A
	B₁A₁	15.84	a	A
	B₃A₁	14.06	b	AB
	B₄A₁	12.92	b	B
	B₄A₂	11.01	c	C
	B₃A₂	10.64	cd	C
	B₂A₂	10.24	cd	C
	B₁A₂	9.55	d	C
	B₃A₁	18.28	a	A
C₃	B₂A₁	18.14	a	A
	B₁A₁	18.13	a	A
	B₄A₁	17.27	b	A
	B₂A₂	16.17	c	B
	B₁A₂	15.88	c	B
	B₄A₂	15.73	cd	B
	B₃A₂	15.06	d	B

活力指数 Vitality index	组合 Cross	平均数 Mean	5%差异 Significance of difference at 0.05 level	1%差异 Significance of difference at 0.01 level
C₁	B₁×A₁	136.76	a	A
	B₂A₁	127.20	a	A
	B₃A₁	106.24	b	B
	B₄A₁	102.83	b	B
	B₂A₂	92.28	c	BC
	B₁A₂	92.19	c	BC
	B₄A₂	85.90	c	C
	B₃A₂	85.51	c	C
C₂	B₂A₁	15.86	a	A
	B₁A₁	15.84	a	A
	B₃A₁	14.06	b	AB
	B₄A₁	12.92	b	B
	B₄A₂	11.01	c	C
	B₃A₂	10.64	cd	C
	B₂A₂	10.24	cd	C
	B₁A₂	9.55	d	C
	B₃A₁	18.28	a	A
C₃	B₂A₁	18.14	a	A
	B₁A₁	18.13	a	A
	B₄A₁	17.27	b	A
	B₂A₂	16.17	c	B
	B₁A₂	15.88	c	B
	B₄A₂	15.73	cd	B
	B₃A₂	15.06	d	B

组合 Cross	体积 Volume (mL)	千粒重 Thousand-grain weight (g)	幼苗长度 Seedling length (cm)	幼苗鲜重 Seedling fresh weight(mg)	幼苗干重 Seedling dry weight(mg)	发芽率 Germination rate (%)
B₂A₁	77.07^aA	58.47^aA	18.40^aAB	129.15^aA	16.13^aA	98.50^aA
B₁A₁	74.05^bA	59.13^aA	18.42^aAB	139.02^aA	16.13^aA	98.38^aA
B₄A₁	67.40^cB	55.40^bB	17.52^bBC	104.40^bcBC	13.10^bBC	98.50^aA
B₃A₁	58.78^dC	48.45^cC	18.60^aA	108.05^bB	14.30^bAB	98.32^aA
B₂A₂	49.70^eD	38.45^eE	16.85^bcCD	96.00^cdBCD	10.65^cdD	96.10^bA
B₄A₂	49.25^eD	44.03^dD	16.20^cD	88.57^dD	11.32^cdCD	97.00^abA
B₁A₂	46.55^fD	38.03^eE	16.60^cCD	96.38^cdBCD	9.95^dD	95.75^bA
B₃A₂	39.35^gE	32.92^fF	16.15^cD	91.72^dCD	11.40^cCD	93.22^cB

不同粒级春小麦种子活力差异比较

Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王春生, 李剑峰, 张跃强, 樊哲儒, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 张宏芝, 王立红, 夏建强, 王芳平, 赵奇. 新疆主栽春小麦品种花药培养力基因型差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086.
[2]	袁莹莹, 赵经华, 迪力穆拉提·司马义, 杨庭瑞. 基于apriori算法对盆栽春小麦生理指标及产量的分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871.
[3]	袁以琳, 颜安, 左筱筱, 侯正清, 张振飞, 肖淑婷, 孙哲, 马梦倩, 赵宇航. 氮肥减量配施生物有机肥对春小麦增产及土壤培肥的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882.
[4]	杨梅, 赵红梅, 迪丽热巴·夏米西丁, 杨卫君, 张金汕, 惠超. 氮肥减量配施生物质炭对春小麦群体结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589.
[5]	王一钊, 杨其志, 刘玉秀, 阿拉依·努尔卡马力, Vladimir Shvidchenko, 张正茂. PEG胁迫下评价哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
[6]	张宏芝, 王立红, 时佳, 孔德鹏, 王重, 高新, 李剑峰, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒, 张跃强. 土壤水分对不同抗旱性春小麦品种叶片保护性酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047.
[7]	古力尼尕尔·吐尔洪, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 张路路, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同引发剂处理对春小麦种子活力及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 869-877.
[8]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[9]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[10]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[11]	王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.
[12]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[13]	刘兴宇, 袁建钰, 李广, 张娟, 徐万恒, 张霞霞. 陇中黄土高原春小麦品种和优化施肥[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1398-1405.
[14]	石秀楠, 王玉娇, 米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 曼孜拉·阿布来提, 阿依米克然·阿布都许库尔, 张金汕. 不同果枝节位和铃位对棉花种子活力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 295-300.
[15]	贾永红, 魏海鹏, 侯殿亮, 曾潮武, 纳斯如拉·克热木, 梁晓东. 新疆自育春小麦品种抗旱性及农艺性状相关性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2940-2948.