不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.014

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (8): 1947-1954.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.08.014

• 园艺特产·农产品加工工程·林业 • 上一篇下一篇

不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响

李自芹¹(), 李文绮², 陶登峰³, 贾文婷¹, 金新文¹, 雷用东¹(), 刘成江¹()

1.新疆农垦科学院,新疆石河子 832000
2.石河子质量与计量检测所,新疆石河子 832000
3.巴州疆淘农哥电子商务有限公司,新疆库尔勒 841000

收稿日期:2024-01-27 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-09-19
通信作者: 雷用东(1988-),男,新疆石河子人,高级实验师,研究方向为农业工程,(E-mail)1134341580@qq.com;
刘成江(1978-),男,新疆石河子人,研究员,研究方向为农产品加工及贮藏工程,(E-mail)75722915@qq.com
作者简介:李自芹(1986-),女,新疆石河子人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为农产品加工及贮藏工程,(E-mail)1402546333@qq.com
基金资助:
“兵团英才”青年项目(2023-2025);新疆生产建设兵团重点领域科技攻关计划(2022AB001);新疆生产建设兵团重点领域科技攻关计划(2020AB012)

Effects of different precooling methods combined with H₂O₂ fumigation on the quality of prune during storage

LI Ziqin¹(), LI Wenqi², TAO Dengfeng³, JIA Wenting¹, JIN Xinwen¹, LEI Yongdong¹(), LIU Chengjiang¹()

1. Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China
2. Shihezi Quality and Measurement Testing Institute, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China
3. Bazhou Jingtao Nongge Electronic Conmerco Co., Ltd.,Korla Xinjiang 841000,China

Received:2024-01-27 Published:2024-08-20 Online:2024-09-19
Correspondence author: LEI Yongdong(1988-),male,from Shihezi,Xinjiang,senior experimenter,research orientation:agricultural engineering,(E-mail)1134341580@qq.com;
LIU Chengjiang(1978- ),female,from Shihezi,Xinjiang,researcher,research orientation:processing and storage of agricultural products,(E-mail)75722915@qq.com
Supported by:
‘Corps of Excellence’ Youth Project(2023-2025);Corps key areas of science and technology research plan(2022AB001);Corps key areas of science and technology research plan(2020AB012)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同预冷方式结合过氧化氢(H₂O₂)熏蒸处理对西梅采后贮藏保鲜效果的影响。【方法】以新疆生产建设兵团第三师东风农场西梅为试材,分别采用蓄冷周转箱、原位压差、冷库直冷式预冷并结合3% H₂O₂对西梅进行熏蒸及纳米聚乙烯微孔保鲜膜(N)包装的预处理措施,以无预冷及熏蒸处理为对照(CK),于1℃,湿度85%~90%的保鲜库中贮藏,通过定期测定西梅的生理指标,分析西梅在贮藏期间品质的变化规律。【结果】较对照组,三种预冷方式结合3% H₂O₂熏蒸处理,在一定程度上均有效保持了西梅的贮藏品质。不同处理组对西梅贮藏品质保鲜效果:原位压差预冷处理组>预蓄冷周转箱处理组>原位压差预冷处理组>冷库直冷处理组>CK。其中,原位压差预冷处理组较CK,呼吸强度推迟了30 d,预蓄冷周转箱和冷库直冷较CK组推迟了15 d。在第90 d,蓄冷周转箱、原位压差、冷库直冷处理组果实腐烂率分别为CK组的 61.2%、40.8%和51%,硬度分别较CK组分别提高了17.65%、70.6%和5.9%。原位压差预冷处理组更好的抑制了西梅的腐烂率、失重率,硬度、可溶性固形物、可滴定酸以及VC含量的下降速率,提高了果实SOD、CAT和POD的活性,阻止了西梅的软化,最大限度地保持了西梅的贮藏品质。【结论】采后预冷结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理对延缓西梅的衰老进程,保持较好的贮藏品质有促进的作用,尤其是隧道式原位压差预冷结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理维持西梅采后保鲜效果最佳。

关键词: 西梅; 预冷方式; 过氧化氢; 贮藏品质

Abstract:

【Objective】 To investigate the effects of different precooling methods combined with hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) fumigation on postharvest storage and fresh-keeping of prune.【Methods】 The Dongfeng Farm prune of Xinjiang 3rd Division was used as the test material. The prunes were stored at 1℃ and the humidity was 85%-90%. The physiological indexes of prunes were measured regularly. The prunes were stored at 1℃ and stored in a fresh storage room with no precooling or fumigation as control (CK). The quality changes of prune during storage were analyzed. 【Results】 Compared with the control group, the three precooling methods combined with 3%H₂O₂ fumigation treatment effectively maintained the storage quality of prune to a certain extent. Comparison of storage quality and fresh-keeping effect of prune in different treatment groups: In-situ differential pressure pre-cooling treatment group > pre-storage turnover box treatment group > cold storagedirect cooling treatment group > CK.Among them, the respiratory intensity of the in-situ differential pressurepre-cooling treatment group was delayed by 30 days compared with the CK group, and the pre-storage coldturnover box and cold storage direct cooling were delayed by 15 days compared with the CK group. On the 90th day, the fruit decay rates of the cold storage turnover box, in-situ pressure difference, and cold storage directcooling treatment groups were 61.2 %, 40.8 %, and 51 % of the CK group, respectively, and the hardness was17.65 %, 70.6 %, and 5.9 % higher than that of the CK group, respectively. The in-situ differential pressurepre-cooling treatment group better inhibited the decay rate, weight loss rate, hardness, soluble solids, titratableacid and VC content of the plum, increased the activity of SOD, CAT and POD, prevented the softening of theplum, and maximized the storage quality of the plum.【Conclusion】 Postharvest pre-cooling combined with H₂O₂ fumigation treatment has a positive effect on delaying the senescence process of prunes and maintainingbetter storage quality. In particular, tunnel in-situ differential pressure pre-cooling combined with H₂O₂fumigation treatment has the best effect on maintaining postharvest preservation of prunes.

Key words: prune; pre-cooling mode; H₂O₂; storage quality

中图分类号:

S662.2
S37

李自芹, 李文绮, 陶登峰, 贾文婷, 金新文, 雷用东, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1947-1954.

LI Ziqin, LI Wenqi, TAO Dengfeng, JIA Wenting, JIN Xinwen, LEI Yongdong, LIU Chengjiang. Effects of different precooling methods combined with H₂O₂ fumigation on the quality of prune during storage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1947-1954.

图/表 10

图1 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间腐烂率的变化

Fig.1 Changes of influence of different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation on prune decay rate during storage

图2 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间失重率的变化

Fig.2 Changes of different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation on the weight loss rate of prune during storage

图3 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间呼吸强度的变化

Fig.3 Changes of respiratory intensity of prune during storage induced by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图4 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间硬度的变化

Fig.4 Changes of hardness of prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图5 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间可溶性固形物的变化

Fig.5 Changes of soluble solids of prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图6 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间可滴定酸含量的变化

Fig.6 Changes of titrable acid content of prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图7 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间VC含量的变化

Fig.7 Changes of VC content in prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图8 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间SOD活性的变化

Fig.8 Changes of SOD activity of Prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图9 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间CAT活性的变化

Fig.9 Changes of CAT activity of prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

图10 不同预冷方式结合H2O2熏蒸处理下西梅贮藏期间PPO活性的变化

Fig.10 Changes of PPO activity of prune during storage by different precooling methods combined with H2O2 fumigation

参考文献 30

[1]	张玎婕, 胡超, 朱远洋, 等. 不同品种及产地西梅香气成分差异性研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(23): 33-40.
	ZHANG Dingjie, HU Chao, ZHU Yuanyang, et al. Study of differences among different prune varieties and producing areas in prune aroma components[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(23): 33-40.
[2]	努尔曼·阿不拉, 阿依古丽·铁木儿, 比丽克孜·托合提, 等. 不同氮磷钾施肥配比对西梅‘法兰西’产量及果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(4): 789-795.
	Nuerman Abula, Ayiguli Tiemuer, Bilikezi Tuoheti, et al. Effects of different treatments of N, P, K fertilization proportion on yield and fruit quality in P. domestica L.‘France'[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(4): 789-795.
[3]	李扬, 张士青. 西梅与人类疾病防治的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2015, 21(6): 1078-1080.
	LI Yang, ZHANG Shiqing. Research progress of prunes and human diseases[J]. Medical Recapitulate, 2015, 21(6): 1078-1080.
[4]	夏娜, 周茜, 任小娜, 等. 西梅“女神” “法兰西” 果实品质比较研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2020, 41(12): 69-74.
	XIA Na, ZHOU Qian, REN Xiaona, et al. Comparative study on fruit quality of Prunus domestica “empress” and “France”[J]. Food Research and Development, 2020, 41(12): 69-74.
[5]	甘玲, 陈明林, 吕恩利. 不同预冷方式对荔枝预冷效果的影响[J]. 现代农业装备, 2020, 41(5): 8-13, 23.
	GAN Ling, CHEN Minglin, LYU Enli. Effects of different precooling methods on precooling effect of litchi[J]. Modern Agricultural Equipment, 2020, 41(5): 8-13, 23.
[6]	王顺玉, 黄小凤, 刘瑶, 等. 不同预冷方式对西兰花货架期品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(20): 266-272.
	WANG Shunyu, HUANG Xiaofeng, LIU Yao, et al. Effect of different precooling methods on shelf life quality of broccoli[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(20): 266-272.
[7]	时文林, 赵雅琦, 闫志成, 等. 不同预冷方式对甜玉米储藏品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2022, 43(15): 218-226.
	SHI Wenlin, ZHAO Yaqi, YAN Zhicheng, et al. Effects of different precooling methods on storage quality of sweet corn[J]. Food Science, 2022, 43(15): 218-226. DOI
[8]	刘琼瑜, 肖波, 吴耀森, 等. 二次冷凝融霜冷库预冷荔枝的降温特性研究[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2023, 23(2): 7-14.
	LIU Qiongyu, XIAO Bo, WU Yaosen, et al. Study on cooling characteristics of pre-cooled Litchi in cold storage with secondary condensation and defrosting[J]. Storage and Process, 2023, 23(2): 7-14.
[9]	王晓冉, 马笑巍, 刘岳, 等. 不同因素对国光苹果差压预冷效果的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2022, 47(12): 20-26.
	WANG Xiaoran, MA Xiaowei, LIU Yue, et al. Effects of different factors on differential pressure pre-cooling of Guoguang apple[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2022, 47(12): 20-26.
[10]	宋方圆, 谢小燕, 郭慧静, 等. 不同蓄冷包装对蟠桃贮藏后货架期品质的影响[J]. 包装工程, 2022, 43(9): 58-64.
	SONG Fangyuan, XIE Xiaoyan, GUO Huijing, et al. Effect of different cold storage packages on the shelf life quality of flat peach after storage[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2022, 43(9): 58-64.
[11]	林毅雄, 林艺芬, 陈艺晖, 等. 过氧化氢对采后龙眼果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(22): 244-248. DOI
	LIN Yixiong, LIN Yifen, CHEN Yihui, et al. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on quality of harvested Longan fruits during storage[J]. Food Science, 2016, 37(22): 244-248. DOI
[12]	黄昭先, 陈靓, 王翔宇, 等. 过氧化氢对大豆浓缩磷脂色泽的影响[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2020, 33(1): 58-60.
	HUANG Zhaoxian, CHEN Liang, WANG Xiangyu, et al. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on Gardner of soybean concentrated phospholipids[J]. Cereals & Oils, 2020, 33(1): 58-60.
[13]	郝西, 崔亚男, 张俊, 等. 过氧化氢浸种对花生种子发芽及生理代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1834-1840. DOI
	HAO Xi, CUI Yanan, ZHANG Jun, et al. Effects of hydrogen peroxide soaking on germination and physiological metabolism of seeds in peanut[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1834-1840. DOI
[14]	李自芹, 李文绮, 贾晓昱, 等. H₂O₂雾化熏蒸处理对小白杏贮藏品质及生理特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44(11): 361-368.
	LI Ziqin, LI Wenqi, JIA Xiaoyu, et al. Effects of H₂O₂ atomizing fumigation on storage quality and physiological characteristics of small white apricot[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(11): 361-368.
[15]	陈双颖, 赵习姮, 刘洪竹, 等. 水杨酸和H₂O₂处理对鲜切青花菜抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(2): 260-264. DOI
	CHEN Shuangying, ZHAO Xiheng, LIU Hongzhu, et al. Effect of salicylic acid and H₂O₂ treatments on antioxidative properties of fresh-cut broccoli florets[J]. Food Science, 2015, 36(2): 260-264.
[16]	程琳琳, 肖丽梅, 钟梅, 等. 1-MCP和ClO₂处理对新疆蟠桃采后品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2011, 32(12): 314-319.
	CHENG Linlin, XIAO Limei, ZHONG Mei, et al. Combined effect of 1-MCP and ClO₂ on storage quality of Xinjiang flat peaches[J]. Food Science, 2011, 32(12): 314-319.
[17]	王思滢, 寇莉萍, 蔚江涛, 等. 1-MCP处理对冬枣低温贮藏期间品质变化的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42(22): 64-70.
	WANG Siying, KOU Liping, YU Jiangtao, et al. Effect of 1-MCP treatment on quality of winter jujube during low-temperature storage[J]. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42(22): 64-70.
[18]	杨涛. 间歇充氮加压条件下草莓和冬枣采后生理变化及贮藏效应研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2020.
	YANG Tao. Study on Postharvest Physiological Changes and Storage Effects of Strawberry and Dongzao Jujube under Intermittent Nitrogen and Pressure[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2020.
[19]	曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版杜, 2013: 24-40.
	CAO Jiankang, JIANG Weibo, ZHAO Yumei. Guidance on Postharvest Physiological and Biochemical Experiments of Fruits and Vegetables[M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2013: 24-40.
[20]	司敏, 伍利芬, 薛华丽, 等. 采前赤霉素处理对李果实采后冷害的抑制及部分机理研究[J]. 中国果树, 2018,(4): 4-9.
	SI Min, WU Lifen, XUE Huali, et al. Controlling chilling injury of plum with preharvest GA3 in postharvest and its partial mechanism[J]. China Fruits, 2018,(4): 4-9.
[21]	Prasad K, Sharma R R, Asrey R, et al. Hydrocolloid edible coatings extend shelf life, reduce postharvest decay, and maintain keeping quality of mango fruits (Mangifera indica L.) under ambient storage[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2022, 46(12): e14481.
[22]	田全明. 真空预冷结合N₂包装对鲜杏采后品质的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
	TIAN Quanming. The Influence of Vacuum Pre-cooling Combined with Nitrogen Packaging on the Fresh Apricot Postharvest Quality[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021.
[23]	Hasan M U, Riaz R, Malik A U, et al. Potential of Aloe vera gel coating for storage life extension and quality conservation of fruits and vegetables: an overview[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2021, 45(4): e13640.
[24]	You Y L, Zhou Y N, Duan X W, et al. Research progress on the application of different preservation methods for controlling fungi and toxins in fruit and vegetable[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2023, 63(33): 12441-12452.
[25]	赵月. 铁皮柿子气调贮藏保鲜实验及研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨商业大学, 2021.
	ZHAO Yue. Experiment and Study on Air Conditioning Storage and Fresh-keeping of Iron Persimmon[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Commerce, 2021.
[26]	Zhao W B, An J X, Hu Y M, et al. Tavaborole-induced inhibition of the Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis pathway against Botrytis cinerea contributes to disease control and fruit quality preservation[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2022, 70(39): 12297-12309.
[27]	陈兴开, 常子安, 连欢, 等. 产地预冷和冷链流通对红心火龙果贮藏品质的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2022, 42(7): 1-7, 27.
	CHEN Xingkai, CHANG Zian, LIAN Huan, et al. Effects of precooling and cold chain circulation on storage quality of red pitaya[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2022, 42(7): 1-7, 27.
[28]	王童. 低温环境结合1-MCP在鲜切甘蓝、娃娃菜中的应用[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2022.
	WANG Tong. Application of Low Temperature Combined with 1-MCP in Fresh Cut Cabbage and Brassica Pekinensis[D]. Shenyang: Liaoning University, 2022.
[29]	张怡, 乔勇进, 姚连谋, 等. 不同预冷方式对采后蓝莓贮藏品质的影响[J]. 农产品加工, 2020,(9): 31-35.
	ZHANG Yi, QIAO Yongjin, YAO Lianmou, et al. Effect of different pre-cooling treatments on quality of blueberry during storage[J]. Farm Products Processing, 2020,(9): 31-35.
[30]	刘孝永, 赵双枝, 陈蕾蕾, 等. 不同采后处理对快递包装下甜樱桃品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(24): 126-131. DOI
	LIU Xiaoyong, ZHAO Shuangzhi, CHEN Leilei, et al. Effects of different post-harvest treatments on the quality of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) under express packaging[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(24): 126-131. DOI

不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂熏蒸处理对西梅贮藏期间品质的影响

Effects of different precooling methods combined with H₂O₂ fumigation on the quality of prune during storage

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	田全明, 祁华梅, 殷贝贝, 魏佳, 张政, 王曼, 邢世均, 袁宇尧, 吴斌. 氯化钙采前喷施对西梅采后果实活性氧代谢的调节作用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1937-1946.
[2]	许进宗, 包建平. 不同滴灌灌水量对库尔勒香梨果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1696-1709.
[3]	田全明, 殷贝贝, 祁华梅, 魏佳, 张政, 邢世均, 王曼, 袁宇尧, 吴斌. 采前喷施CaCl₂对西梅采后果实软化品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7): 1717-1726.
[4]	李自芹, 李文绮, 谷天雨, 张正红, 李宇辉, 马小宁, 刘成江. 原位差压预冷结合过氧化氢熏蒸处理对快递包装下鲜食枸杞品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1416-1422.
[5]	李自芹, 李文绮, 陈雅, 张正红, 党富民, 赵志永, 雷用东. 延迟预冷结合过氧化氢熏蒸对蟠桃贮藏品质及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 908-915.
[6]	李自芹, 李文绮, 王纪文, 马小宁, 赵志永, 党富民. 不同预冷方式结合1-甲基环丙烯对红提葡萄的保鲜效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 92-100.
[7]	李自芹, 陈雅, 李文绮, 贾文婷, 郭慧静, 宋方圆, 赵志永, 刘成江. 不同预冷方式结合H₂O₂处理对绿糖心冬枣贮藏期间品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215.
[8]	郭慧静, 宋方圆, 李冀新, 赵志永. 蟠桃专用包装盒在模拟运输中减振功能分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1284-1291.
[9]	纪锋, 李志元, 尚志勇, 张连文. 运输过程中振动对哈密瓜的机械损伤和贮藏品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 458-465.
[10]	郑素慧, 何庆, 张健, 关军锋, 秦南南, 杨怡靖铭, 刘雪艳, 吴斌. 茉莉酸甲酯对红地球葡萄采后贮藏品质和病害的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 190-198.
[11]	吴玉鹏;赵晓梅;叶凯;陈维维. 钙和1-MCP处理对库尔勒香梨贮藏品质和萼端黑斑病的影响[J]. , 2016, 53(1): 9-15.
[12]	地丽热巴·地里夏提;张霞;庄淑珍;张富春. 盐穗木谷胱甘肽转硫酶基因的克隆和表达分析[J]. , 2014, 51(2): 318-324.
[13]	努尔曼·阿不拉;沙比尔江·阿巴克;阿卜杜许库尔·牙合甫;故丽米热·卡克什. 5个西梅品种光合特性、叶绿素及产量的对比研究[J]. , 2013, 50(9): 1626-1631.
[14]	吴学红;高杰. 洋葱春化处理对3种酶活性变化规律的研究[J]. , 2013, 50(6): 1083-1088.
[15]	努尔曼·阿不拉;沙比尔江·阿巴克;热沙来提·艾孜孜;木合塔尔·扎热. 5个西梅品种光响应和CO2响应及叶片部分特性差异[J]. , 2012, 49(12): 2189-2195.