等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.004

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2103-2111.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.004

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响

张泽华(), 叶含春(), 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健

石河子大学水利建筑工程学院/现代节水灌溉兵团重点实验室/农业农村部西北绿洲节水农业重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000

收稿日期:2024-03-07 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-10-09
通信作者: 叶含春(1966-),男,新疆库尔勒人,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为水资源开发利用,(E-mail)739301184@qq.com
作者简介:张泽华(1996-),男,辽宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为干旱区水肥调控方向,(E-mail)luckyzzh2022@163.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团重大科技项目(2021AA003-1);“十四五”国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFD1900405);石河子大学高层次人才科研启动项目(2022CK009);“十四五”国家重点研发计划专题(2021YFD1900802-2);石河子大学科技特派员团队服务项目(KJTP202310)

Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation

ZHANG Zehua(), YE Hanchun(), WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian

College of Water Conservancy and Architecture Engineering, Shihezi University / Key Laboratory of Modern Water-Saving Irrigation of Xijiang Production and Construction Corps / Key Laboratory of Northwest Oasis Water-Saving Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi Xinjiang 832000, China

Received:2024-03-07 Published:2024-09-20 Online:2024-10-09
Supported by:
Corps major scientific and technological projets(2021AA003-1);National‘14th Five-Year’key research and development plan project(2022YFD1900405);Shihezi University high-level talent research start-up project(2022CK009);National‘14th Five-Year’key R & D plan project(2021YFD1900802-2);Shihezi University Science and Technology Commissioner Team Service Project(KJTP202310)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究滴灌棉花生长发育及产量品质对等氮配施脲酶抑制剂乙酰氧肟酸(AHA)的响应特征,为滴灌棉花高效合理的氮肥管理提供依据。【方法】以新陆早42号为材料,设置施氮量0%(U)、施氮量1%(U+UI_1%)、施氮量2%(U+UI_2%)和施氮量5%(U+UI_5%),4种AHA添加比例进行棉花田间试验。【结果】与U处理相比,添加AHA显著提高了棉花在花期、结铃期、盛铃期的生理生长,株高、茎粗、叶面积指数(LAI)、净光合速率、蒸腾速率和气孔导度总体表现为U+UI_2%>U+UI_1%>U+UI_5%。U+UI_1%、U+UI_2%、U+UI_5%处理的籽棉产量较U处理分别显著提高4.59%、9.18%和4.65%,且U+UI_2%处理与其他处理均有显著差异(P<0.05)。不同处理棉花品质均无显著差异(P>0.05)。叶片净光合速率与棉花籽棉产量间呈最大正相关,棉花单铃重与籽棉产量呈负相关。【结论】尿素配施2%施氮量AHA的U+UI_2%处理在棉花生长、生理和产量方面均表现最优,为滴灌棉花高稳定性氮素施配的最佳选择。

关键词: 棉花; 脲酶抑制剂; 生理生长; 产量; 品质

Abstract:

【Objective】 The aim of this study is to clarify the response of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor Acetohydroxamic acid (AHA) on cotton growth, development, yield, and quality mulched drip irrigation in order to provide a theoretical basics for efficient and reasonable nitrogen management of cotton. 【Methods】 Field experiments were conducted by using Xinluzao 42 under four kinds of AHA addition ratios (the addition amount was 0% of the nitrogen application amount (U), the addition amount was 1% of the nitrogen application amount (U + UI_1%), the addition amount was 2% of the nitrogen application amount (U + UI_2%) and the addition amount was 5% of the nitrogen application amount (U + UI_5%). 【Results】 Compared with U, AHA significantly improved the physiological growth of cotton at flowering stage, bolling stage and full boll stage. Plant height, stem diameter, leaf area index, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance in the key period (flowering stage, bolling stage and full boll stage) was U + UI_2% > U + UI_1% > U + UI_5% treatment. The seed cotton yield of U + UI_1%, U + UI_2% and U + UI_5% treatments was significantly higher than that of U by 4.59%, 9.18% and 4.65%, and there was significant difference between U + UI_2% and other treatments (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cotton quality among different treatments (P > 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that there was the largest positive correlation between net photosynthetic rate of leaves and seed cotton yield, and there was a negative correlation between single boll weight and seed cotton yield. 【Conclusion】 The U + UI_2% treatment of urea combined with 2 % nitrogen application AHA shows the best performance in cotton growth, physiology and yield, which is the best choice for high stability nitrogen application of drip irrigation cotton. The results will provide data support and theoretical reference for efficient management of drip irrigation cotton nitrogen fertilizer in Xinjiang.

Key words: cotton; urease inhibitor; physiological growth; yield; quality

中图分类号:

S562

张泽华, 叶含春, 王振华, 李文昊, 李海强, 刘健. 等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.

ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.

图/表 8

参考文献 28

[1]	卢秀茹, 贾肖月, 牛佳慧. 中国棉花产业发展现状及展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(1): 26-36.
	LU Xiuru, JIA Xiaoyue, NIU Jiahui. The present situation and prospects of cotton industry development in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 26-36.
[2]	李文娆, 李永竞, 冯士珍. 不同施氮量和分施比例对棉花幼苗生长和水分利用效率的影响及其根源ABA调控效应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(20): 6712-6723.
	LI Wenrao, LI Yongjing, FENG Shizhen. Regulation of root-sourced ABA to growth and water use efficiency of cotton seedlings and their response to different nitrogen levels and distribution ratios[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(20): 6712-6723.
[3]	Chen J, Liu L T, Wang Z B, et al. Nitrogen fertilization effects on physiology of the cotton boll-leaf system[J]. Agronomy, 2019, 9(6): 271.
[4]	马芬, 杨荣全, 郭李萍. 控制氮肥施用引起的活性氮气体排放:脲酶/硝化抑制剂研究进展与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 908-922.
	MA Fen, YANG Rongquan, GUO Liping. Decrease the emission of active nitrogen gases in nitrogen fertilizer application: research progresses and perspectives of urease/nitrification inhibitors[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 908-922.
[5]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China statistical yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021.
[6]	Du E Z, Terrer C, Pellegrini A F A, et al. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2020, (13): 221-226.
[7]	Fraser F C, Hallett P D, Wookey P A, et al. How do enzymes catalysing soil nitrogen transformations respond to changing temperatures?[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2013, 49(1): 99-103.
[8]	赵伟鹏, 王倩姿, 王东, 等. 设施大棚黄瓜-紫甘蓝轮作体系产量和土壤氮平衡对氮素调控剂的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(6):980-990.
	ZHAO Weipeng, WANG Qianzi, WANG Dong, et al. Response of vegetable yields and soil nitrogen balance to nitrogen regulators in a greenhouse cucumber-purple cabbage rotation system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(6):980-990.
[9]	Silva A G B, Sequeira C H, Sermarini R A, et al. Urease inhibitor NBPT on ammonia volatilization and crop productivity: a meta-analysis[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2017, 109(1): 1-13.
[10]	张玉琪, 马源, 文铜, 等. 祁连山东缘高寒草甸植物及各部位对氮素添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1628-1636.
	ZHANG Yuqi, MA Yuan, WEN Tong, et al. Responses of alpine meadow plants and their parts to nitrogen addition in the eastern Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1628-1636.
[11]	王月福, 姜东, 于振文, 等. 氮素水平对小麦籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响及其生理基础[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(5): 513-520.
	WANG Yuefu, JIANG Dong, YU Zhenwen, et al. Effects of nitrogen rates on grain yield and protein content of wheat and its physiological basis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(5): 513-520.
[12]	王芳, 李春梅, 马云珍, 等. 连续定位不同施氮水平对棉花光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(1): 18-26.
	WANG Fang, LI Chunmei, MA Yunzhen, et al. Effect of continuous positioning of different nitrogen application levels on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2022, 45(1): 18-26.
[13]	石洪亮, 严青青, 张巨松, 等. 氮肥对非充分灌溉下棉花花铃期光合特性及产量的补偿作用[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(8): 1196-1204.
	SHI Hongliang, YAN Qingqing, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Compensation effect of nitrogen fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield during cotton flowering boll-setting stage under non-sufficient drip irrigation[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(8): 1196-1204.
[14]	刘建涛, 许靖, 孙志梅, 等. 氮素调控剂对不同类型土壤氮素转化的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(10): 2901-2906.
	LIU Jiantao, XU Jing, SUN Zhimei, et al. Effects of different nitrogen regulators on nitrogen transformation in different soil types[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(10): 2901-2906.
[15]	张俊鹏. 咸水灌溉覆膜棉田水盐运移规律及耦合模拟[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2015.
	ZHANG Junpeng. Water and salt transport law and coupling simulation in film-covered cotton field irrigated by salt water[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2015.
[16]	蔡焕杰, 邵光成, 张振华. 不同水分处理对膜下滴灌棉花生理指标及产量的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(4): 29-32.
	CAI Huanjie, SHAO Guangcheng, ZHANG Zhenhua. The effect of different irrigation patterns on cotton growth and yield under the condition of drip irrigation under plastic mulch[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 30(4): 29-32.
[17]	李杰, 马腾飞, 郭蕾, 等. 哈密地区棉花品种生长发育特征及产量构成差异研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(3): 509-515.
	Li Jie, Ma Tengfei, Guo Lei, et al. Different characteristics on development and yield composition of cotton varieties in Hami prefecture[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(3): 509-515.
[18]	周丽娜, 金建新, 李凤霞, 等. 尿素配施脲酶抑制剂对春玉米株高和生物量的影响[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2017, 58(12): 53-55.
	ZHOU Lina, JIN Jianxin, LI Fengxia, et al. Plant height and biomass of spring maize as affected by combined application of urea and urease inhibitor[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 58(12): 53-55.
[19]	万年鑫, 黄强, 郑顺林, 等. 硝化/脲酶抑制剂对秋马铃薯植株及土壤氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(1): 83-89.
	WAN Nianxin, HUANG Qiang, ZHENG Shunlin, et al. Effects of nitrification/urease inhibitors on potato yield and soil mineral nitrogen content[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(1): 83-89.
[20]	王静, 王允青, 万水霞, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂对沿淮平原糯稻养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(1): 77-82.
	WANG Jing, WANG Yunqing, WAN Shuixia, et al. Effects of urease/nitrification inhibitor on nutrient uptake of glutinous rice in plain along the Huaihe River[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 36(1): 77-82.
[21]	Muneer Ahmed. 脲酶抑制剂减少氮肥损失和提高氮肥利用率效应研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018.
	MUNEER Ahmed. Study on the effect of urease inhibitor on reducing nitrogen loss and improving nitrogen utilization rate[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2018.
[22]	张翠仙, 陈于福, 尼章光, 等. 不同海拔对帕拉英达杧果光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(5): 749-759.
	ZHANG Cuixian, CHEN Yufu, NI Zhangguang, et al. Effects of different altitudes on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality in Myahintha mango[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(5): 749-759.
[23]	王艳华, 邱现奎, 胡国庆, 等. 新型包膜缓释尿素对花生生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(6):190-194.
	WANG Yanhua, QIU Xiankui, HU Guoqing, et al. Effects of homemade coated controlled release urea on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of peanut[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(6):190-194.
[24]	宋涛, 尹俊慧, 胡兆平, 等. 脲酶/硝化抑制剂减少农田土壤氮素损失的作用特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4): 585-597.
	SONG Tao, YIN Junhui, HU Zhaoping, et al. Characteristics of urease/nitrification inhibitors in reducing nitrogen losses in farmland soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(4): 585-597.
[25]	郝胜磊, 蔡廷瑶, 冯小杰, 等. 新型肥料对全球三大粮食作物产量和土壤生物学活性影响的Meta分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9): 1496-1505.
	HAO Shenglei, CAI Tingyao, FENG Xiaojie, et al. Effects of new fertilizers on the yield and soil biological activity of three major food crops: a global meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(9): 1496-1505.
[26]	张文学, 王萍, 孙刚, 等. 脲酶抑制剂不同用量对土壤氮素供应的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018,(6): 38-44, 52.
	ZHANG Wenxue, WANG Ping, SUN Gang, et al. Effects of urease inhibitor addition rate on nitrogen transformation in paddy soil[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018,(6): 38-44, 52.
[27]	Li W F, Zhou Z G, Meng Y L, et al. Modeling boll maturation period, seed growth, protein, and oil content of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009, 112(2/3): 131-140.
[28]	李文峰, 孟亚利, 陈兵林, 等. 气象因子对棉籽脂肪和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(4): 1832-1839.
	LI Wenfeng, MENG Yali, CHEN Binglin, et al. Effects of climatic factors on fat and total protein contents in cottonseeds[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(4): 1832-1839.

深度 Depth (cm)	田间持水率 Soil field capacity (g/g)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	全磷 Total phosphorus (g/kg)	全钾 Soil total potassium (g/kg)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)	pH值 pH value
0~20	18.21%	0.80	0.96	7.6	33.42	422.13	7.66
20~40	18.84%	0.91	0.95	8.7	28.14	401.89	7.67

深度 Depth (cm)	田间持水率 Soil field capacity (g/g)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	全磷 Total phosphorus (g/kg)	全钾 Soil total potassium (g/kg)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)	pH值 pH value
0~20	18.21%	0.80	0.96	7.6	33.42	422.13	7.66
20~40	18.84%	0.91	0.95	8.7	28.14	401.89	7.67

处理 Treatments	收获株数 Number of harvesteplants (10⁴ plant/hm²)	单株结铃数 Number of bolls per plant	单铃重 Boll weight (g/boll)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²)
U	23.25±0.50^a	5.54±0.13^c	5.29±0.06^a	44.61±1.27^a	5 090.15±43.69^c
U+UI_1%	23.33±0.52^a	5.74±0.05^b	5.26±0.11^a	45.42±2.52^a	5 323.75±53.25^b
U+UI_2%	23.75±0.50^a	6.08±0.10^a	5.29±0.03^a	45.56±1.20^a	5 557.23±61.42^a
U+UI_5%	23.25±0.66^a	5.81±0.07^b	5.15±0.09^a	43.61±1.45^a	5 326.60±73.76^b

处理 Treatments	收获株数 Number of harvesteplants (10⁴ plant/hm²)	单株结铃数 Number of bolls per plant	单铃重 Boll weight (g/boll)	衣分 Lint Percentage (%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm²)
U	23.25±0.50^a	5.54±0.13^c	5.29±0.06^a	44.61±1.27^a	5 090.15±43.69^c
U+UI_1%	23.33±0.52^a	5.74±0.05^b	5.26±0.11^a	45.42±2.52^a	5 323.75±53.25^b
U+UI_2%	23.75±0.50^a	6.08±0.10^a	5.29±0.03^a	45.56±1.20^a	5 557.23±61.42^a
U+UI_5%	23.25±0.66^a	5.81±0.07^b	5.15±0.09^a	43.61±1.45^a	5 326.60±73.76^b

项目 Items	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield	净光合速率 Pn	单铃重 Signal Boll weight	铃数 Number of bolls	株高 Plant height	地上部生物量 Above-ground biomass	叶面积指数 LAI	茎粗 Stem diameter
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield	1
净光合速率Pn	0.882^**	1
单铃重 Signal Boll weight	-0.158	0.175	1
铃数Number of bolls	0.860^**	0.896^**	0.137	1
株高Plant height	0.871^**	0.798^**	0.013	0.845^**	1
地上部生物量 Above-ground biomas	0.712^**	0.777^**	0.227	0.859^**	0.744^**	1
叶面积指数LAI	0.603^*	0.687^*	0.041	0.652^*	0.415	0.483	1
茎粗Stem diameter	0.758^**	0.785^**	-0.109	0.814^**	0.796^**	0.680^*	0.680^*	1

等氮配施脲酶抑制剂对滴灌棉花生长发育和产量及品质的影响

Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treat- ments	马克隆值 Macronaire	整齐度 Evenness degree (%)	断裂比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex)	伸长率 Elongation (%)
U	5.0±0.13^a	81.0±4.2^a	29.1±1.5^a	5.4±0.12^a
U+UI_1%	4.9±0.03^a	82.6±5.6^a	32.1±2.1^a	5.5±0.10^a
U+UI_2%	5.0±0.21^a	81.5±5.7^a	29.4±1.1^a	5.5±0.11^a
U+UI_5%	4.9±0.11^a	81.5±6.3^a	29.0±1.6^a	5.5±0.21^a

[1]	杨明花, 廖必勇, 刘强, 彭云承, 达吾来·杰克山, 冯国瑞, 唐式敏. 鲜食糯玉米籽粒营养品质的差异变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093.
[2]	李永泰, 高阿香, 李艳军, 张新宇. 脱叶剂对不同敏感性棉花品种生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102.
[3]	陈瑞杰, 罗林毅, 阮向阳, 冶军. 腐植酸对滴灌棉田土壤养分和棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[4]	黄铂轩, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 邵晶晶, 冯卫娜, 庞朝友, 徐文修, 董合林. 不同氮素抑制剂对棉花生长发育、氮素利用与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[5]	王超, 徐文修, 李鹏程, 郑苍松, 孙淼, 冯卫娜, 邵晶晶, 董合林. 棉花苗期生长发育对土壤速效钾水平的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[6]	张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[7]	刘晶, 杜明川, 张文婷, 鲍海娟, 景美玲, 杜文华. 青海不同地区小黑麦种质的筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190.
[8]	田海燕, 张占琴, 颉建辉, 王建江, 杨相昆. 加工番茄果实番茄红素与主要品质性状的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[9]	张庭军, 李字辉, 崔豫疆, 孙孝贵, 陈芳. 微生物菌剂对棉花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[10]	陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[11]	乔雅洁, 付慧鑫, 乔雪, 孟新涛, 张婷, 潘俨. 不同贮藏温度条件下鲜牛肉品质的变化规律[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2323-2329.
[12]	张承洁, 胡浩然, 段松江, 吴一帆, 张巨松. 氮肥与密度互作对海岛棉生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[13]	董志多, 徐菲, 付秋萍, 黄建, 祁通, 孟阿静, 付彦博, 开赛尔·库尔班. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[14]	候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 周大伟. 有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量和土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.
[15]	陈芳, 李字辉, 王兵跃, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 微生物菌剂对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860.