天山云杉球果和针叶性状对海拔梯度的响应特征

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.10.014

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 2465-2474.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.10.014

天山云杉球果和针叶性状对海拔梯度的响应特征

魏立志¹(), 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉¹(), 唐努尔·叶尔肯², 王强¹, 徐栋¹

1.新疆农业大学林学与风景园林学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆林业和草原局天然林保护中心,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2024-04-15 出版日期:2024-10-20 发布日期:2024-11-07
通信作者: 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉(1976-),男,新疆人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为植被生态学,(E-mail)erjan0701@163.com
作者简介:魏立志(1998-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为植被生态学,(E-mail)2572540654@qq.com
基金资助:
中央财政林业改革发展资金“基于大样地的天山云杉林生物多样性空间规律及植被生态过程”(新林规字〔2022〕9号)

Characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cones and needles traits in response to altitudinal gradients

WEI Lizhi¹(), Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan¹(), Tangnuer Yeerken², WANG Qiang¹, XU Dong¹

1. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Natural Forest Protection Center of Xinjiang Forestry and Grassland Bureau, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2024-04-15 Published:2024-10-20 Online:2024-11-07
Correspondence author: Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan (1976-),male, from Xinjiang, associate professor, master's supervisor,research direction: vegetation ecology research,(E-mail)erjan0701@163.com
Supported by:
Central Fiscal Forestry Reform and Development Fund “Spatial Patterns of Biodiversity and Vegetation Ecological Processes in Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica Based on Large Sample Plots”(Planning Finance Office of Xinjiang Forestry and Grassland Bureau(2022-9)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 研究天山云杉(Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica)球果和针叶性状对海拔梯度的适应机制。【方法】 选择天山山脉从东到西处于不同经度位置4个地点的天山云杉林,采集测定不同种群天山云杉球果和针叶性状,采用Tukey's HSD多重比较、相关性及回归分析等方法分析表型和功能性状的分布特征。【结果】 天山云杉球果和针叶性状在不同海拔梯度间差异显著;表型可塑性指数在不同海拔梯度存在不同程度差异,天山云杉球果和针叶性状可塑性指数随海拔的上升而变大;55对性状组合中,有34对组合呈极显著相关水平(P<0.01),包括25对组合呈极显著正相关,9对组合呈极显著负相关;天山云杉表型性状整体上随海拔梯度的升高呈显著减小趋势,功能性状整体上随海拔的升高呈曲线变化趋势。【结论】 天山北坡海拔因子对天山云杉表型和功能性状的影响显著,天山云杉通过多个性状的相互协调和资源分配适应外部垂直海拔梯度变化的生存环境。

关键词: 天山云杉; 表型性状; 功能性状; 海拔梯度; 可塑性指数

Abstract:

【Objective】 In order to explore the adaptation mechanism of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica (Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica) cones and needles traits to altitudinal gradient. 【Methods】 Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica forests were selected from east to west of the TianShan Mountains at different longitude positions, and different populations of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica were collected and measured for the traits of cones and needles, and the distribution characteristics of the phenotypic and functional traits and their correlations were analyzed by using Tukey's HSD multiple comparisons, correlation analyses, and regression analyses. 【Results】 Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cone and needles traits varied significantly among different elevation gradients; phenotypic plasticity indices varied to different degrees among different elevation gradients, and overall, the plasticity indices of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cones and needle traits became larger with the increase of elevation; Among the 55 pairs of trait combinations, 34 pairs of combinations showed highly significant correlation levels (P<0.01), including 25 pairs of highly significant positive correlations and 9 pairs of highly significant negative correlations. Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica phenotypic traits as a whole showed a significant decreasing trend with the elevation gradient, and functional traits as a whole showed a curvilinear variance trend with the elevation gradient. 【Conclusion】 Altitudinal factors on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains significantly affect the phenotypic and functional traits of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica, which adapt to the survival environment of the external vertical altitudinal gradient through the mutual coordination of multiple traits and resource allocation.

Key words: Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica; phenotypic traits; functional traits; altitudinal gradient; plasticity index

中图分类号:

S757.3

魏立志, 叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 唐努尔·叶尔肯, 王强, 徐栋. 天山云杉球果和针叶性状对海拔梯度的响应特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2465-2474.

WEI Lizhi, Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan, Tangnuer Yeerken, WANG Qiang, XU Dong. Characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cones and needles traits in response to altitudinal gradients[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2465-2474.

图/表 8

参考文献 25

[1]	He N P, Li Y, Liu C C, et al. Plant trait networks: improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 35(10): 908-918.
[2]	Villesseche H, Ecarnot M, Ballini E, et al. Unsupervised analysis of NIRS spectra to assess complex plant traits: leaf senescence as a use case[J]. Plant Methods, 2022, 18(1): 100. DOI PMID
[3]	郄亚栋, 蒋腊梅, 吕光辉, 等. 温带荒漠植物叶片功能性状对土壤水盐的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(11): 2000-2010. DOI
	QIE Yadong, JIANG Lamei, LYU Guanghui, et al. Response of plant leaf functional traits to soil aridity and salinity in temperate desert ecosystem[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(11): 2000-2010.
[4]	Brunet J, Holmquist K G A. The influence of distinct pollinators on female and male reproductive success in the Rocky Mountain columbine[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2009, 18(17): 3745-3758. DOI PMID
[5]	王超, 卢杰, 周晨霓, 等. 藏东南川滇高山栎叶功能性状海拔分布特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2021, 41(4): 366-372.
	WANG Chao, LU Jie, ZHOU Chenni, et al. Altitude distribution of leaf functional traits of Quercus aquifolioides in southeastern Tibet[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2021, 41(4): 366-372.
[6]	Khatri K, Negi B, Bargali K, et al. Phenotypic variation in morphology and associated functional traits in Ageratina adenophora along an altitudinal gradient in Kumaun Himalaya, India[J]. Biologia, 2023, 78(5): 1333-1347.
[7]	Kergunteuil A, Descombes P, Glauser G, et al. Plant physical and chemical defence variation along elevation gradients: a functional trait-based approach[J]. Oecologia, 2018, 187(2): 561-571. DOI PMID
[8]	叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 天山云杉林林分特征与立地条件关联分析[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(3): 410-414.
	Yeerjiang Baiketuerhan, ZHANG Chunyu, ZHAO Xiuhai. Association analysis between forest stand traits and habitat conditions in Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica forest in Tianshan Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2013, 19(3): 410-414.
[9]	潘存德. 新疆山地天然林及其群落演替与更新[J]. 新疆林业, 2020, (5): 8-14.
	PAN Cunde. Succession and regeneration of natural forests and their communities in mountainous areas of Xinjiang[J]. Forestry of Xinjiang, 2020, (5): 8-14.
[10]	臧润国, 刘贵峰, 巴哈尔古丽·阿尤甫, 等. 天山云杉球果大小性状的地理变异规律[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 45(2): 27-32.
	ZANG Runguo, LIU Guifeng, Bahaerguli Ayoufu, et al. Geographic Variation of Cone Size of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica in the Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 45(2): 27-32.
[11]	张慧文, 马剑英, 孙伟, 等. 不同海拔天山云杉叶功能性状及其与土壤因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(21): 5747-5758.
	ZHANG Huiwen, MA Jianying, SUN Wei, et al. Altitudinal variation in functional traits of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica and their relationship to soil factors in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(21): 5747-5758.
[12]	Falkenhagen E R, Nash S W. Multivariate classification in provenance research. A comparison of two statistical techniques[J]. Silvae genetica, 1978, 27(1): 14-23.
[13]	Wang C Y, Jiang K, Liu J, et al. Moderate and heavy Solidago canadensis L. invasion are associated with decreased taxonomic diversity but increased functional diversity of plant communities in East China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 112: 55-64.
[14]	Takahashi K, Matsuki S. Morphological variations of the Solidago virgaurea L. complex along an elevational gradient on Mt Norikura, central Japan[J]. Plant Species Biology, 2017, 32(3): 238-246.
[15]	Körner C. A re-assessment of high elevation treeline positions and their explanation[J]. Oecologia, 1998, 115(4): 445-459. DOI PMID
[16]	Eller F, Brix H. Different genotypes of Phragmites australis show distinct phenotypic plasticity in response to nutrient availability and temperature[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2012, 103: 89-97.
[17]	Funk J L. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96(6): 1162-1173.
[18]	刘贵峰. 天山云杉种群与群落特征及其地理变化规律的初步研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2008.
	LIU Guifeng. Preliminary Study on the Population & Community Characteristics of Picea Schrenkiana Var. Tianschanica and Its Geographic Variation[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2008.
[19]	Reisch C, Rosbakh S. Patterns of genetic variation in European plant species depend on altitude[J]. Diversity and Distributions, 2021, 27(1): 157-163.
[20]	Liu W S, Zheng L, Qi D H. Variation in leaf traits at different altitudes reflects the adaptive strategy of plants to environmental changes[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10(15): 8166-8175. DOI PMID
[21]	喻阳华, 钟欣平, 程雯. 黔西北地区优势树种叶片功能性状与经济谱分析[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(2): 196-201.
	YU Yanghua, ZHONG Xinping, CHENG Wen. Analysis of relationship among leaf functional traits and economics spectrum of dominant species in northwestern Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2018, 38(2): 196-201.
[22]	Cheng T, Rivard B, Sánchez-Azofeifa A G, et al. Deriving leaf mass per area (LMA) from foliar reflectance across a variety of plant species using continuous wavelet analysis[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 87: 28-38.
[23]	Akram M A, Zhang Y H, Wang X T, et al. Phylogenetic independence in the variations in leaf functional traits among different plant life forms in an arid environment[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2022, 272: 153671.
[24]	Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, et al. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content[J]. Functional Ecology, 2001, 15(5): 688-695.
[25]	Polley H W, Collins H P, Fay P A. Community leaf dry matter content predicts plant production in simple and diverse grassland[J]. Ecosphere, 2022, 13(5): e4076.

研究地点 Study site	县(市) Counties (cities)	经度 Longitude(E)	纬度 Latitude(N)	海拔 Altitude (m)	调查株树 No. of plants (株)	胸径范围 Chest diameter range(cm)
天山中东部 Central and eastern tianshan mountains	吉木萨尔县	89°01'	43°46'	1 700~2 700	50	25.4~62.7
天山中部 Central tianshan mountains	乌鲁木齐市	86°48'	43°23'	1 700~2 700	50	26.5~76.1
天山中西部 Central and westen tianshan mountains	乌苏市	84°21'	44°08'	1 700~2 700	50	25.4~61.3
天山西部 Western tianshan mountains	巩留县	82°52'	43°08'	1 500~2 400	45	30.1~104.6

研究地点 Study site	县(市) Counties (cities)	经度 Longitude(E)	纬度 Latitude(N)	海拔 Altitude (m)	调查株树 No. of plants (株)	胸径范围 Chest diameter range(cm)
天山中东部 Central and eastern tianshan mountains	吉木萨尔县	89°01'	43°46'	1 700~2 700	50	25.4~62.7
天山中部 Central tianshan mountains	乌鲁木齐市	86°48'	43°23'	1 700~2 700	50	26.5~76.1
天山中西部 Central and westen tianshan mountains	乌苏市	84°21'	44°08'	1 700~2 700	50	25.4~61.3
天山西部 Western tianshan mountains	巩留县	82°52'	43°08'	1 500~2 400	45	30.1~104.6

海拔 Altitude(m)	种群 Population	球果干质量 CDW(g)	球果长 CL(cm)	球果宽 CW(cm)	球果长宽比 CLW(cm)	针叶长 NL(mm)	针叶宽 NW(mm)
Ⅰ <1 800	天山中东部	11.146^ab±0.373	8.211^b±0.222	3.416^b±0.186	2.35^ab±0.124	25.435^a±0.778	1.228^a±0.017
	天山中部	9.032^c±0.433	7.485^c±0.146	3.154^c±0.172	2.35^ab±0.117	23.772^b±0.762	1.164^ab±0.049
	天山中西部	10.806^b±0.655	8.167^b±0.439	3.541^b±0.120	2.185^b±0.06	23.525^b±1.376	1.135^b±0.055
	天山西部	12.496^a±1.343	9.532^a±0.385	3.935^a±0.121	2.415^a±0.089	24.142^ab±0.601	1.136^b±0.032
Ⅱ 1 800~2 100	天山中东部	10.562^a±1.148	7.779^b±0.446	3.445^b±0.104	2.249^b±0.097	24.260^b±2.04	1.270^a±0.015
	天山中部	10.202^a±0.542	7.855^b±0.258	3.226^c±0.249	2.465^a±0.158	25.241^ab±1.4	1.210^b±0.029
	天山中西部	10.799^a±1.655	8.168^b±0.578	3.584^b±0.235	2.274^b±0.096	25.541^ab±1.109	1.273^a±0.041
	天山西部	11.746^a±1.212	9.166^a±0.345	3.909^a±0.119	2.338^ab±0.08	26.412^a±0.867	1.132^c±0.052
Ⅲ 2 100~2 400	天山中东部	9.015^b±0.918	6.817^c±0.253	3.200^c±0.055	2.138^bc±0.06	22.856^b±1.277	1.222^a±0.019
	天山中部	9.719^b±0.914	7.349^b±0.307	3.050^c±0.220	2.433^a±0.176	23.114^b±1.505	1.158^b±0.041
	天山中西部	8.739^b±0.950	7.005^bc±0.47	3.401^b±0.123	2.061^c±0.117	22.615^b±1.447	1.188^ab±0.057
	天山西部	12.013^a±1.162	9.156^a±0.481	4.011^a±0.122	2.273^b±0.108	26.878^a±0.872	1.051^c±0.03
Ⅳ >2 400	天山中东部	8.822^b±0.155	6.644^a±0.258	3.178^a±0.091	2.138^b±0.068	20.316^b±1.379	1.201^a±0.007
	天山中部	7.571^b± 1.155	6.514^a±0.525	2.660^b±0.279	2.433^a±0.176	20.672^b±1.055	1.115^b±0.059
	天山中西部	7.045^b±0.442	6.448^a±0.342	3.213^a±0.175	2.061^b±0.117	20.987^b±0.38	1.119^b±0.021
	天山西部	10.983^a±4.421	7.647^a±2.027	3.454^a±0.416	2.273^b±0.108	24.644^a±0.663	1.017^c±0.008

海拔 Altitude(m)	种群 Population	球果干质量 CDW(g)	球果长 CL(cm)	球果宽 CW(cm)	球果长宽比 CLW(cm)	针叶长 NL(mm)	针叶宽 NW(mm)
Ⅰ <1 800	天山中东部	11.146^ab±0.373	8.211^b±0.222	3.416^b±0.186	2.35^ab±0.124	25.435^a±0.778	1.228^a±0.017
	天山中部	9.032^c±0.433	7.485^c±0.146	3.154^c±0.172	2.35^ab±0.117	23.772^b±0.762	1.164^ab±0.049
	天山中西部	10.806^b±0.655	8.167^b±0.439	3.541^b±0.120	2.185^b±0.06	23.525^b±1.376	1.135^b±0.055
	天山西部	12.496^a±1.343	9.532^a±0.385	3.935^a±0.121	2.415^a±0.089	24.142^ab±0.601	1.136^b±0.032
Ⅱ 1 800~2 100	天山中东部	10.562^a±1.148	7.779^b±0.446	3.445^b±0.104	2.249^b±0.097	24.260^b±2.04	1.270^a±0.015
	天山中部	10.202^a±0.542	7.855^b±0.258	3.226^c±0.249	2.465^a±0.158	25.241^ab±1.4	1.210^b±0.029
	天山中西部	10.799^a±1.655	8.168^b±0.578	3.584^b±0.235	2.274^b±0.096	25.541^ab±1.109	1.273^a±0.041
	天山西部	11.746^a±1.212	9.166^a±0.345	3.909^a±0.119	2.338^ab±0.08	26.412^a±0.867	1.132^c±0.052
Ⅲ 2 100~2 400	天山中东部	9.015^b±0.918	6.817^c±0.253	3.200^c±0.055	2.138^bc±0.06	22.856^b±1.277	1.222^a±0.019
	天山中部	9.719^b±0.914	7.349^b±0.307	3.050^c±0.220	2.433^a±0.176	23.114^b±1.505	1.158^b±0.041
	天山中西部	8.739^b±0.950	7.005^bc±0.47	3.401^b±0.123	2.061^c±0.117	22.615^b±1.447	1.188^ab±0.057
	天山西部	12.013^a±1.162	9.156^a±0.481	4.011^a±0.122	2.273^b±0.108	26.878^a±0.872	1.051^c±0.03
Ⅳ >2 400	天山中东部	8.822^b±0.155	6.644^a±0.258	3.178^a±0.091	2.138^b±0.068	20.316^b±1.379	1.201^a±0.007
	天山中部	7.571^b± 1.155	6.514^a±0.525	2.660^b±0.279	2.433^a±0.176	20.672^b±1.055	1.115^b±0.059
	天山中西部	7.045^b±0.442	6.448^a±0.342	3.213^a±0.175	2.061^b±0.117	20.987^b±0.38	1.119^b±0.021
	天山西部	10.983^a±4.421	7.647^a±2.027	3.454^a±0.416	2.273^b±0.108	24.644^a±0.663	1.017^c±0.008

海拔 Altitude(m)	种群 Population	叶厚度 LT(mm)	叶面积 LA(cm²)	比叶重 LMA(g/m²)	叶含水量 LWC(%)	叶干物质含量 LDWC(mg/g)
Ⅰ <1 800	天山中东部	0.949^a±0.056	22.412^a±2.062	305.162^a±31.03	41.810^a±1.457	557.815^b±10.263
	天山中部	0.880^b±0.026	21.244^ab±1.243	279.023^a±26.905	44.559^a±2.891	574.296^ab±9.958
	天山中西部	0.972^a±0.027	19.354^b±0.726	276.869^a±27.65	43.698^a±1.917	558.472^b±18.735
	天山西部	0.886^b±0.026	23.436^a±1.247	244.047^a±36.5	46.535^a±3.970	604.488^a±25.789
Ⅱ 1 800~2 100	天山中东部	0.933^a±0.043	22.285^b±2.140	284.555^a±2.218	42.795^b±2.947	524.951^b±39.471
	天山中部	0.839^b±0.036	24.776^a±0.724	254.508^b±8.794	47.344^b±2.209	515.873^b±14.195
	天山中西部	0.877^b±0.045	25.170^a±0.983	282.327^a±16.271	47.127^b±3.725	546.664^ab±22.794
	天山西部	0.797^c±0.021	26.434^a±1.716	261.095^ab±17.388	53.358^a±5.941	572.706^a±25.911
Ⅲ 2 100~2 400	天山中东部	0.931^a±0.058	19.744^b±1.532	267.066^b±11.255	50.141^a±3.200	479.241^c±30.888
	天山中部	0.823^b±0.027	19.582^b±1.918	294.975^a±9.258	49.451^a±1.699	504.693^b±16.943
	天山中西部	0.824^b±0.021	20.319^b±2.186	245.752^b±12.318	50.138^a±4.204	497.364^bc±15.455
	天山西部	0.792^b±0.011	24.306^a±1.726	248.422^b±20.884	52.960^a±4.879	541.975^a±18.080
Ⅳ >2 400	天山中东部	0.988^a±0.033	17.960^b±1.907	335.790^a±61.388	41.359^b±4.644	514.517^b±22.439
	天山中部	0.887^b±0.017	18.807^ab±1.664	340.277^a±45.626	45.539^ab±4.055	513.600^b±24.718
	天山中西部	0.881^b±0.025	18.308^b±1.081	307.826^a±11.613	41.800^b±2.892	532.946^ab±26.734
	天山西部	0.831^c±0.059	21.359^a±1.899	301.888^a±14.495	49.235^a±0.571	567.465^a±17.571

天山云杉球果和针叶性状对海拔梯度的响应特征

Characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. tianschanica cones and needles traits in response to altitudinal gradients

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

植物性状 Plant traits	球果干质量 CDW	球果长 CL	球果宽CW	球果长宽比CLW	针叶长 NL	针叶宽 NW	叶厚度 LT	叶面积 LA	比叶重 LMA	叶含水量 LWC
球果干质量 CDW	1
球果长 CL	0.88^**	1
球果宽 CW	0.733^**	0.827^**	1
球果长宽比 CLW	0.292^**	0.366^**	-0.16	1
针叶长 NL	0.636^**	0.725^**	0.668^**	0.223^*	1
针叶宽 NW	-0.059	-0.202	-0.131	-0.044	0.05	1
叶厚度 LT	-0.189	-0.308^**	-0.271^*	-0.144	-0.346^**	0.371^**	1
叶面积 LA	0.595^**	0.688^**	0.62^**	0.277^*	0.85^**	0.136	-0.369^**	1
比叶重 LMA	-0.182	-0.298^**	-0.355^**	-0.04	-0.335^**	-0.118	0.431^**	-0.385^**	1
叶含水量 LWC	0.299^**	0.361^**	0.348^**	0.133	0.425^**	-0.158	-0.539^**	0.423^**	-0.421^**	1
叶干物质含量 LDMC	0.475^**	0.604^**	0.492^**	0.19	0.351^**	-0.264^*	-0.088	0.377^**	-0.062	-0.15

[1]	李振瑜, 耿召坤, 赵善超, 高玉德, 王褚, 王世伟, 潘存德, 张国林. 天山云杉林地上植被与土壤种子库物种相似性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2230-2236.
[2]	杨璐, 王娜, 范少丽, 程平, 李宏, 汪阳东. 黑桑种质资源表型性状变异特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(5): 1172-1181.
[3]	马琪瑶, 郝康迪, 胡天祺, 陈哲, 王振锡. 不同分辨遥感影像下天山云杉林分形特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 209-216.
[4]	席丽, 李思瑶, 夏晓莹, 陈玉雯, 李林, 王杰, 马小龙, 米尔扎提·柯尼加里木, 阿丽耶·麦麦提, 王卫霞. 不同郁闭度天山云杉林土壤养分特征[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2216-2222.
[5]	李志强, 陈昱东, 吕光辉, 王金龙, 蒋腊梅, 王恒方, 李韩鹏, 张磊. 荒漠草本植物功能性状的土壤水盐响应特征及生态策略[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2038-2045.
[6]	曲延斌, 王振锡, 胡天祺, 董巍, 陈哲. 基于机载激光雷达影像的天山云杉林树高提取及蓄积量反演[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 958-964.
[7]	夏晓莹, 李思瑶, 王杰, 马小龙, 席丽, 米尔扎提·柯尼加里木, 阿丽耶·麦麦提, 王卫霞. 地形因子对天山北坡天山云杉林土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 965-973.
[8]	胡文聪, 潘存德, 赵善超, 宋梦真, 童海麦, 田晨阳. 天山北坡中部天山云杉1 a生天然更新幼苗存活数量与功能性状的微生境分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 454-463.
[9]	吕金城, 王振锡, 杨勇强, 曲延斌, 马琪瑶. 基于WorldView-2影像和随机森林算法的天山云杉蓄积量反演[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1992-1998.
[10]	杨延龙, 马君, 师维军. 引进陆地棉种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 310-319.
[11]	陈昱东, 吕光辉, 张磊, 蒋腊梅, 王恒方. 荒漠植物功能性状和生物量对土壤水盐环境的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2574-2584.
[12]	葛瑶, 王振锡. 天山云杉林不同林型物种多样性对土壤因子的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 134-144.
[13]	仇倩倩, 冯一峰, 吴翠云. 枣种质资源叶表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 282-293.
[14]	裴媛, 王振锡, 朱思名, 葛瑶, 师玉霞. 天山西部云杉林群落数量分类与排序[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(2): 313-323.
[15]	李琼, 常世豪, 舒文涛, 杨青春, 李金花, 张东辉, 张保亮, 张来成, 耿臻. 黄淮海地区夏大豆(南片)46份大豆品种(系)农艺性状综合分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1765-1774.