Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Cucumber Cultivated with Yellow Sand and Slag Composite Substrate

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.03.009

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 597-608.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.03.009

• Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Cucumber Cultivated with Yellow Sand and Slag Composite Substrate

MA Xinchao¹^,²^,³(), ZHOU Yu¹^,², LIU Qing¹, XUAN Zhengying¹^,²^,³(), CHEN Mengmeng¹, ZHANG Kaihao¹, WANG Xufeng³, TAN Zhanming¹

1. College of Plant Sciences, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
2. National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for High Efficiency and High Quality Cultivation and Deep Processing Technology of Special Fruit Trees in Southern Xinjiang,Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
3. Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2021-06-15 Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-03-28
Correspondence author: XUAN Zhengying
Supported by:
XPCC's scientific and technological research project(2018DB003);XPCC's "ten facts" agricultural technology radiation driving project(SJSS201801);President fund project of Tarim University(TDZKYB201903);Key industry support plan project in southern Xinjiang(2019DB001);Graduate innovation training program of Tarim University(TDGRI202023)

水肥耦合对黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响

马新超¹^,²^,³(), 周宇¹^,², 刘青¹, 轩正英¹^,²^,³(), 陈蒙蒙¹, 张凯浩¹, 王旭峰³, 谭占明¹

1.塔里木大学植物科学学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.塔里木大学南疆特色果树高效优质栽培与深加工技术国家地方联合工程实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.现代农业工程自治区重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300

通讯作者: 轩正英
作者简介:马新超(1998-),男,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为设施农业,(E-mail) mxczky@163.com
基金资助:
兵团科技攻关项目(2018DB003);兵团“十件实事”农业技术辐射带动工程项目(SJSS201801);塔里木大学校长基金项目(TDZKYB201903);南疆重点产业支撑计划项目(2019DB001);塔里木大学研究生创新训练项目(TDGRI202023)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of water and fertilizer coupling on photosynthetic fluorescence, yield and quality of cucumber. 【Methods】 Taking "Xintaimici " cucumber as the test material, under the cultivation mode of yellow sand and slag composite substrate, four variables including irrigation amount, nitrogen fertilizer, phosphorus fertilizer and potassium fertilizer were set up, and one half of the four variable quadratic general rotation combination design was used. 【Results】 (1) The net photosynthetic rate of cucumber increased with the increase of irrigation amount; under the condition of less water, proper fertilizer supply could improve the photosynthetic capacity of cucumber. (2) Under the water and nitrogen supply of 105% Ep, the lower P and K fertilizer was helpful to the chlorophyll synthesis of cucumber. Under 90% Ep water supply, the chloroplast pigment content of cucumber leaves was at a high level, and the maximum light conversion efficiency F_v / F_m was the highest. (3) Under the water supply of 75% Ep, higher N and K fertilizer, and lower P fertilizer could improve the single fruit weight of cucumber, and proper reduction of irrigation could improve the yield and quality of cucumber. 【Conclusion】 Under the cultivation mode of yellow sand and slag composite substrate, the optimal ratio of water and fertilizer for greenhouse cucumber production is C₁₆, that is 90% Ep and N 540 kg / hm²+ P₂O₅270 kg / hm² + K₂O 1,043 kg / hm².

Key words: cucumber; water fertilizer coupling; photosynthesis; fluorescence; yield; quality

摘要：

【目的】研究不同水肥耦合处理对黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响。【方法】以新泰密刺黄瓜为试材,在黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培模式下,设置不同的灌水量、氮肥、磷肥和钾肥共4个变量,采用四元二次通用旋转组合设计的1/2。【结果】(1)黄瓜净光合速率随着灌溉量的增加而增加;水分较少的情况下,适当的肥料供应可以提高黄瓜光合能力。(2)105%Ep水分和氮肥供给下,较低的磷钾肥有助于黄瓜叶绿素的合成。90%Ep水分供给下,黄瓜植株叶片的叶绿体色素含量处在较高的水平,最大光转化效率值Fv/Fm最大。(3)75%Ep的水分供给下,较高的氮肥和钾肥,再施以较低的磷肥有助于提高黄瓜的单果重,适当减少灌水量有助于提高黄瓜产量和品质。【结论】在黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培模式下,适用于设施黄瓜生产的最优水肥配比是处理C₁₆,即90%Ep和N 540 kg/hm²+P₂O₅ 270 kg/hm²+K₂O 1 043 kg/hm²。

关键词: 黄瓜, 水肥耦合, 光合, 荧光, 产量, 品质

CLC Number:

S642.2

MA Xinchao, ZHOU Yu, LIU Qing, XUAN Zhengying, CHEN Mengmeng, ZHANG Kaihao, WANG Xufeng, TAN Zhanming. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Cucumber Cultivated with Yellow Sand and Slag Composite Substrate[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(3): 597-608.

马新超, 周宇, 刘青, 轩正英, 陈蒙蒙, 张凯浩, 王旭峰, 谭占明. 水肥耦合对黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 597-608.

Figures/Tables 10

References 32

[1]	李静, 李志军, 张富仓, 等. 水氮供应对温室黄瓜叶绿素含量及光合速率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(5): 198-204.
	LI Jing, LI Zhijun, ZHANG Fuchang, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of greenhouse cucumber[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(5): 198-204.
[2]	刘学娜. 水氮耦合对日光温室黄瓜生理特性及水氮利用效率的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2016.
	LIU Xuena. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on physiological characteristics and water-nitrogen use efficiency of cucumber in solar greenhouse[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2016.
[3]	林琭, 汤昀, 张纪涛, 等. 不同水势对黄瓜花后叶片气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(7): 2030-2040.
	LIN Lu, TANG Yun, ZHANG Jitao, et al. Effects of different water potentials on leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cucumber during post-flowering growth stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(7): 2030-2040.
[4]	耿庆玲. 西北旱区农业水土资源利用分区及其匹配特征研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2014.
	GENG Qingling. Research on Zoning of Agricultural Water and Land Resources Utilization and Their Matching Characteristics in Arid Areas of Northwest of China[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014.
[5]	李银坤, 武雪萍, 吴会军, 等. 水氮条件对温室黄瓜光合日变化及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(S1): 122-129.
	LI Yinkun, WU Xueping, WU Huijun, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen conditions on the diurnal variation of photosynjournal and yield of cucumber in greenhouse[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(S1): 122-129.
[6]	陈永山. 氮素对温室黄瓜花后叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数影响的定量研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2007.
	CHEN Yongshan. Quantifying the effects of nitrogen on leaf photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of greenhouse cucumber after flowering[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007.
[7]	李银坤, 郭文忠, 薛绪掌, 等. 不同灌溉施肥模式对温室番茄产量、品质及水肥利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(19): 3757-3765.
	LI Yinkun, GUO Wenzhong, XUE Xuzhang, et al. Effects of different fertigation modes on tomato yield, fruit quality, and Water and Fertilizer Utilization in Greenhouse[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(19): 3757-3765.
[8]	陈丽娜. 水肥耦合对温室无土栽培水果黄瓜生长发育和品质的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
	CHEN Lina. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on growth and quality of fruit cucumber of soilless culture in greenhouse[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011.
[9]	周宇, 陈蒙蒙, 刘青, 等. 黄沙和炉渣不同配比基质对温室黄瓜植株生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(9): 117-124.
	ZHOU Yu, CHEN Mengmeng, LIU Qing, et al. Effects of different proportions of yellow sand and slag on the growth and physiological characteristics of greenhouse cucumber plants[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(9): 117-124.
[10]	李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰, 等. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI Hesheng, SUN Qun, ZHAO Shijie, et al. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[11]	高俊凤. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
	GAO Junfeng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
[12]	蒋静静, 屈锋, 苏春杰, 等. 不同肥水耦合对黄瓜产量品质及肥料偏生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(1): 86-97.
	JIANG Jingjing, QU Feng, SU Chunjie, et al. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Yield and Quality of Cucumber and Partial Factor Productivity of Fertilizer[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(1): 86-97.
[13]	Richard A R. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 80(1): 197-211. DOI URL
[14]	王鹏勃. 番茄基质栽培水肥耦合效应研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014.
	WANG Pengbo. Study on the effect of water and fertilizer coupling on tomato cultivated With subtrate in greenhouse[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2014.
[15]	李建明, 潘铜华, 王玲慧, 等. 水肥耦合对番茄光合、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(10): 82-90.
	LI Jianming, PAN Tonghua, WANG Linghui, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on tomato photosynjournal, yield and water use efficiency[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(10): 82-90.
[16]	付秋实, 李红岭, 崔健, 等. 水分胁迫对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866.
	FU Qiushi, LI Hongling, CUI Jian, et al. Effects of water stress on photosynjournal and associated physiological characters of Capsicum annuum L[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(5): 1859-1866.
[17]	李晓, 冯伟, 曾晓春. 叶绿素荧光分析技术及应用进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006,(10): 2186-2196.
	LI Xiao, FENG Wei, ZENG Xiaochun. Advances in chlorophyll fluorescence analysis and its uses[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006,(10): 2186-2196.
[18]	林兴军. 不同水肥对日光温室番茄品质和抗氧化系统及土壤环境的影响[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2011.
	LIN Xingjun. Effects of different irrigation and fertilizer levels on fruit quality and antioxidant system and soil environment of tomato in the greenhouse[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011.
[19]	Zhen L, Hua L, Wei P L, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency as mediated by application mode or plant density[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, (218): 150-157.
[20]	Verma V M, J. Foulkes A J,. Worlan D. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for flag leaf senescence as a yield determinant in winter wheat under optimal and drought-stressed environments[J]. Euphytica, 2004, 135(3): 255-263. DOI URL
[21]	李邵. 水肥耦合对温室黄瓜产量与品质形成的影响及其生理机制[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2010.
	LI Shao. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on yield and quality formation of greenhouse yield and quality formation of greenhouse cucumber and their physiological mechanism[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2010.
[22]	王虎兵, 曹红霞, 郝舒雪, 等. 温室番茄植株养分和光合对水肥耦合的响应及其与产量关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771.
	WANG Hubing, CAO Hongxia, HAO Shuxue, et al. Responses of plant nutrient and photosynjournal in greenhouse tomato to water-fertilizer coupling and their relationship with yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10): 1761-1771.
[23]	Badr M A, Abou-Hussein S D,. El-Tohamy W A. Tomato yield, nitrogen uptake and water use efficiency as affected by planting geometry and level of nitrogen in an arid region[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, (169): 90-97.
[24]	Badr M A, About-Hussein, S D, El-Tohamy, W A. et al. Nutrient uptake and yield of tomato under various methods of fertilizer application and levels of fertigation in arid lands[J]. Gesunde Pflanzen, 2010, 62(1): 11-19. DOI URL
[25]	Badr, M.A, El-Tohamy, W.A,. Zaghloul, A.M. Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, (110): 9-15.
[26]	Jin L C, Shao Z K, Tai S D, et al. Quantitative response of greenhouse tomato yield and quality to water deficit at different growth stages[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, (129): 152-162.
[27]	Zhao B F, Shan L, Xiao M Z, et al. Conventional flooding irrigation causes an overuse of nitrogen fertilizer and low nitrogen use efficiency in intensively used solar greenhouse vegetable production[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 144(2), 11-19. DOI URL
[28]	Recep Çakir, Ulviye Kanburoglu-Çebi, Surreya Altintas, et al. Irrigation scheduling and water use efficiency of cucumber grown as a spring-summer cycle crop in solar greenhouse[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, (180): 78-87.
[29]	Nangare D D, Singh, Y, Kumar, P S, et al. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by deficit irrigation regulated on phenological basis[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, (171): 73-79.
[30]	Zegbe J A, Behboudian M H, Clothier B E. Responses of ‘Petopride’ processing tomato to partial rootzone drying at different phenological stages[J]. Irrigation Science, 2006, 25(1): 85. DOI URL
[31]	陈秀香, 马富裕, 方志刚, 等. 土壤水分含量对加工番茄产量和品质影响的研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2006,(4): 1-4.
	CHEN Xiuxiang, MA Fuyu, FANG Zhigang, et al. Preliminary study on the influence of soil moisture on yield and quality of processed tomato[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2006,(4): 1-4.
[32]	夏秀波, 于贤昌, 高俊杰. 水分对有机基质栽培番茄生理特性、品质及产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,(12): 2710-2714. PMID
	XIA Xiubo, YU Xianchang, GAO Junjie. Effects of moisture content in organic substrate on the physiological characters, fruit quality and yield of tomato plant[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,(12): 2710-2714. PMID

因素 Factor	变化间距 Varying spacing	水平及编码 Level and code
因素 Factor	变化间距 Varying spacing	-1.682	-1	0	1	1.682
灌水量Ep Irrigation volume (%)	15	65	75	90	105	115
N (kg/hm²)	150	288	390	540	690	792
P (kg/hm²)	60	169	210	270	330	371
K (kg/hm²)	180	427	550	730	920	1 043

因素 Factor	变化间距 Varying spacing	水平及编码 Level and code
因素 Factor	变化间距 Varying spacing	-1.682	-1	0	1	1.682
灌水量Ep Irrigation volume (%)	15	65	75	90	105	115
N (kg/hm²)	150	288	390	540	690	792
P (kg/hm²)	60	169	210	270	330	371
K (kg/hm²)	180	427	550	730	920	1 043

处理 Treatment	净光合速率 Photo(Pn) (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度 Cond(Gs) (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration(Ci) (μmol/mol)	蒸腾速率 Trmmol(Tr) (mmol/(m²·s))	水分利用率 Water use efficiency (WUE) (mmol/mol)
C₁	9.86±0.09^efg	0.15±0.01^bc	246.28±5.43^a	3.71±0.20^bc	2.66±0.12^gh
C₂	10.71±0.72^cde	0.17±0.05^ab	243.21±21.97^a	4.08±0.81^b	2.68±0.35^efgh
C₃	9.40±1.83^g	0.16±0.08^bc	240.02±31.80^a	3.77±1.46^bc	2.67±0.55^fgh
C₄	10.78±0.71^cd	0.14±0.01^cde	221.78±19.10^bcd	3.76±0.15^bc	2.88±0.31^defgh
C₅	7.82±0.37^ij	0.09±0.01^fgh	220.30±9.71^bcd	2.83±0.29^fg	2.77±0.15^efgh
C₆	9.78±0.21^fg	0.13±0.03^cde	230.38±23.14^abc	3.66±0.58^bcd	2.74±0.49^efgh
C₇	11.19±0.64^bc	0.12±0.02^def	207.20±31.32^de	3.46±0.44^cd	3.30±0.60^a
C₈	13.04±0.09^a	0.19±0.00^a	236.86±4.45^ab	4.93±0.02^a	2.64±0.03^gh
C₉	7.43±0.12^jk	0.07±0.00^h	182.98±3.68^f	2.21±0.03^h	3.36±0.09^a
C₁₀	6.84±0.84^k	0.08±0.01^h	219.66±4.70^cd	2.62±0.19^fgh	2.60±0.13^h
C₁₁	9.18±0.29^gh	0.11±0.01^efg	211.70±14.11^de	3.46±0.18^cd	2.66±0.23^gh
C₁₂	8.36±0.07^hi	0.09±0.00^fgh	195.40±4.92^ef	2.89±0.06^efg	2.89±0.08^defgh
C₁₃	9.39±0.31^g	0.09±0.01^fgh	184.71±6.10^f	2.82±0.19^fg	3.34±0.12^a
C₁₄	7.99±1.70^ij	0.08±0.02^gh	196.21±8.49^ef	2.50±0.61^gh	3.21±0.12^abc
C₁₅	10.04±0.05^defg	0.11±0.01^def	205.21±11.24^de	3.13±0.22^def	3.22±0.21^ab
C₁₆	11.74±0.33^b	0.16±0.01^bc	221.32±0.19^bcd	3.95±0.11^bc	2.97±0.00^bcde
C₁₇	10.61±0.98^cdef	0.15±0.03^bc	229.65±10.66^abc	3.59±0.47^bcd	2.97±0.12^bcdef
C₁₈	10.60±0.32^cdef	0.15±0.01^bc	234.43±2.23^abc	3.63±0.16^bcd	2.92±0.05^cdefg
C₁₉	10.61±0.98^cdef	0.15±0.03^bc	229.65±10.66^abc	3.59±0.47^bcd	2.97±0.12^bcdef
C₂₀	10.55±0.76^cdef	0.14±0.03^cd	220.89±15.74^bcd	3.40±0.50^cde	3.13±0.23^abcd

处理 Treatment	净光合速率 Photo(Pn) (μmol/(m²·s))	气孔导度 Cond(Gs) (mol/(m²·s))	胞间CO₂浓度 Intercellular CO₂ concentration(Ci) (μmol/mol)	蒸腾速率 Trmmol(Tr) (mmol/(m²·s))	水分利用率 Water use efficiency (WUE) (mmol/mol)
C₁	9.86±0.09^efg	0.15±0.01^bc	246.28±5.43^a	3.71±0.20^bc	2.66±0.12^gh
C₂	10.71±0.72^cde	0.17±0.05^ab	243.21±21.97^a	4.08±0.81^b	2.68±0.35^efgh
C₃	9.40±1.83^g	0.16±0.08^bc	240.02±31.80^a	3.77±1.46^bc	2.67±0.55^fgh
C₄	10.78±0.71^cd	0.14±0.01^cde	221.78±19.10^bcd	3.76±0.15^bc	2.88±0.31^defgh
C₅	7.82±0.37^ij	0.09±0.01^fgh	220.30±9.71^bcd	2.83±0.29^fg	2.77±0.15^efgh
C₆	9.78±0.21^fg	0.13±0.03^cde	230.38±23.14^abc	3.66±0.58^bcd	2.74±0.49^efgh
C₇	11.19±0.64^bc	0.12±0.02^def	207.20±31.32^de	3.46±0.44^cd	3.30±0.60^a
C₈	13.04±0.09^a	0.19±0.00^a	236.86±4.45^ab	4.93±0.02^a	2.64±0.03^gh
C₉	7.43±0.12^jk	0.07±0.00^h	182.98±3.68^f	2.21±0.03^h	3.36±0.09^a
C₁₀	6.84±0.84^k	0.08±0.01^h	219.66±4.70^cd	2.62±0.19^fgh	2.60±0.13^h
C₁₁	9.18±0.29^gh	0.11±0.01^efg	211.70±14.11^de	3.46±0.18^cd	2.66±0.23^gh
C₁₂	8.36±0.07^hi	0.09±0.00^fgh	195.40±4.92^ef	2.89±0.06^efg	2.89±0.08^defgh
C₁₃	9.39±0.31^g	0.09±0.01^fgh	184.71±6.10^f	2.82±0.19^fg	3.34±0.12^a
C₁₄	7.99±1.70^ij	0.08±0.02^gh	196.21±8.49^ef	2.50±0.61^gh	3.21±0.12^abc
C₁₅	10.04±0.05^defg	0.11±0.01^def	205.21±11.24^de	3.13±0.22^def	3.22±0.21^ab
C₁₆	11.74±0.33^b	0.16±0.01^bc	221.32±0.19^bcd	3.95±0.11^bc	2.97±0.00^bcde
C₁₇	10.61±0.98^cdef	0.15±0.03^bc	229.65±10.66^abc	3.59±0.47^bcd	2.97±0.12^bcdef
C₁₈	10.60±0.32^cdef	0.15±0.01^bc	234.43±2.23^abc	3.63±0.16^bcd	2.92±0.05^cdefg
C₁₉	10.61±0.98^cdef	0.15±0.03^bc	229.65±10.66^abc	3.59±0.47^bcd	2.97±0.12^bcdef
C₂₀	10.55±0.76^cdef	0.14±0.03^cd	220.89±15.74^bcd	3.40±0.50^cde	3.13±0.23^abcd

处理 Treatment	实际光转化效率 Actual light conversion efficiency (ΦPSⅡ)	最大光转化效率 Maximum light conversion efficiency (F_v/F_m)	PSⅡ活性 PSⅡ activity (F_v/F_o)	光化学淬灭系数 Photochemical quenching coefficient (qP)	非光化学淬灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ)
C₁	0.43 ±0.01^ab	0.50 ±0.01^cd	1.00±0.06^cd	0.93±0.00^ab	0.16±0.12^cde
C₂	0.40±0.02^bcd	0.55±0.03^abc	1.21±0.17^abc	0.85±0.02^bcde	0.34±0.14^bc
C₃	0.38±0.01^cdef	0.52±0.06^bc	1.09±0.24^bcd	0.85±0.07^bcde	0.30±0.18^bcd
C₄	0.39±0.02^cde	0.50±0.04^bcd	1.03±0.15^cd	0.86±0.06^abcd	0.21±0.13^bcde
C₅	0.38±0.03^cdef	0.51±0.06^bcd	1.07±0.28^bcd	0.83±0.09^cdef	0.24±0.23^bcde
C₆	0.44±0.01^a	0.50±0.03^cd	1.01±0.13^cd	0.90±0.06^abc	0.05±0.06^e
C₇	0.41±0.02^abc	0.54±0.07^abc	1.19±0.30^bc	0.90±0.08^abc	0.38±0.11^b
C₈	0.32±0.02^g	0.49±0.03^cd	0.95±0.11^cd	0.74±0.02^fg	0.24±0.03^bcde
C₉	0.38±0.02^cdef	0.51±0.03^bcd	1.04±0.11^bcd	0.81±0.03^cdefg	0.19±0.16^bcde
C₁₀	0.31±0.04^g	0.49±0.01^cd	0.96±0.02^cd	0.73±0.09^g	0.30±0.07^bcd
C₁₁	0.39±0.02^cdef	0.53±0.03^bc	1.13±0.14^bc	0.81±0.05^cdefg	0.21±0.11^bcde
C₁₂	0.36±0.01^ef	0.60±0.02^a	1.51±0.10^a	0.75±0.02^efg	0.64±0.05^a
C₁₃	0.43±0.01^ab	0.54±0.06^abc	1.20±0.29^bc	0.84±0.02^bcde	0.14±0.20^cde
C₁₄	0.40±0.01^bcd	0.57±0.02^ab	1.33±0.10^ab	0.80±0.04^defg	0.32±0.04^bcd
C₁₅	0.37±0.02^def	0.55±0.05^abc	1.22±0.26^abc	0.78±0.04^defg	0.32±0.25^bc
C₁₆	0.36±0.03^f	0.53±0.01^bc	1.12±0.06^bcd	0.76±0.05^defg	0.25±0.10^bcde
C₁₇	0.39±0.02^cdef	0.48±0.06^cd	0.95±0.26^cd	0.86±0.12^abcd	0.10±0.03^de
C₁₈	0.40±0.01^bcd	0.57±0.02^ab	1.33±0.10^ab	0.80±0.04^defg	0.32±0.04^bcd
C₁₉	0.41±0.02^abc	0.54±0.07^abc	1.19±0.30^bc	0.90±0.08^abc	0.38±0.11^b
C₂₀	0.39±0.01^cde	0.45±0.01^d	0.81±0.03^d	0.95±0.04^a	0.15±0.12^cde

Effects of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Cucumber Cultivated with Yellow Sand and Slag Composite Substrate

水肥耦合对黄沙炉渣复合基质栽培黄瓜光合荧光特性、产量及品质的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

处理 Treatment	叶绿素a Chlorophyll a (mg/g)	叶绿素b Chlorophyll b (mg/g)	类胡萝卜素 Carotenoids (mg/g)	叶绿素a+b Chlorophyll a + b (mg/g)	叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a /b
C₁	2.14±0.00^p	1.07±0.01^p	0.43±0.00^m	3.21±0.00^s	2.01±0.01^b
C₂	3.65±0.04^b	2.15±0.02^b	0.62±0.01^a	5.80±0.02^b	1.69±0.03^kl
C₃	2.81±0.00^l	1.45±0.01^j	0.50±0.01^g	4.26±0.01^m	1.95±0.01^d
C₄	3.30±0.00^g	1.80±0.00^fg	0.57±0.01^d	5.10±0.00^g	1.83±0.00^g
C₅	3.07±0.01ⁱ	1.61±0.01^h	0.53±0.00^e	4.67±0.00^k	1.91±0.00^f
C₆	3.48±0.00^e	1.96±0.00^c	0.58±0.00^c	5.44±0.01^e	1.77±0.01ⁱ
C₇	2.28±0.00^o	1.15±0.01^o	0.44±0.01^l	3.43±0.00^r	1.97±0.01^c
C₈	2.59±0.01^m	1.35±0.01^l	0.48±0.00ⁱ	3.93±0.00^o	1.92±0.01^ef
C₉	2.51±0.01ⁿ	1.30±0.01^m	0.47±0.01^j	3.82±0.00^p	1.93±0.01^def
C₁₀	2.86±0.01^k	1.47±0.00ⁱ	0.51±0.01^f	4.32±0.01^l	1.94±0.01^de
C₁₁	3.53±0.01^d	1.95±0.01^c	0.57±0.01^d	5.48±0.01^d	1.81±0.01^h
C₁₂	2.58±0.03^m	1.18±0.02ⁿ	0.46±0.01^k	3.76±0.02^q	2.18±0.05^a
C₁₃	2.80±0.01^l	1.41±0.01^k	0.49±0.00^h	4.21±0.01ⁿ	1.98±0.01^c
C₁₄	3.61±0.01^c	2.14±0.01^b	0.58±0.00^c	5.75±0.01^c	1.68±0.01^l
C₁₅	3.86±0.01^a	2.34±0.00^a	0.61±0.00^b	6.20±0.01^a	1.65±0.01^m
C₁₆	3.35±0.01^f	1.83±0.01^e	0.58±0.00^c	5.19±0.00^f	1.83±0.01^gh
C₁₇	3.09±0.01^h	1.80±0.01^g	0.39±0.01^o	4.89±0.00^ij	1.72±0.01^j
C₁₈	3.03±0.01^j	1.85±0.01^d	0.37±0.00^p	4.88±0.00^j	1.64±0.01^m
C₁₉	3.07±0.01ⁱ	1.85±0.00^d	0.37±0.00^p	4.91±0.01^h	1.66±0.01^m
C₂₀	3.09±0.00^h	1.81±0.00^f	0.40±0.00ⁿ	4.90±0.00ⁱ	1.71±0.00^jk

处理 Treatment	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids (%)	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar(%)	可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein (mg/g)	VC Vitamin C (mg/100g)
C₁	4.50±0.17^abcde	2.90±0.06^h	0.63±0.04^h	1.81±0.08^e
C₂	4.83±0.93^abcd	4.21±0.31^abcd	0.87±0.05^bcde	2.14±0.08^c
C₃	5.23±1.89^ab	4.62±0.30^ab	0.95±0.03^ab	1.64±0.08^f
C₄	4.93±0.45^abc	3.09±0.30^gh	0.79±0.03^ef	1.14±0.08^g
C₅	3.97±0.12^de	3.75±0.33^defg	0.76±0.06^fg	0.97±0.08^h
C₆	3.83±0.12^e	3.10±0.38^gh	0.68±0.05^gh	0.81±0.08ⁱ
C₇	4.07±0.21^cde	3.76±0.42^defg	0.65±0.05^h	1.14±0.08^g
C₈	3.77±0.23^e	3.76±0.30^defg	0.76±0.03^fg	3.15±0.08^a
C₉	5.37±0.65^a	3.96±0.41^bcde	0.98±0.05^a	2.31±0.08^b
C₁₀	5.33±0.40^ab	3.19±0.48^fgh	0.81±0.04^ef	1.14±0.08^g
C₁₁	4.13±0.15^cde	3.86±0.35^cdef	0.91±0.07^abcd	0.97±0.08^h
C₁₂	5.40±0.50^a	2.99±0.44^h	0.76±0.04^fg	0.97±0.08^h
C₁₃	3.87±0.06^e	3.47±0.56^efgh	0.93±0.03^abc	1.14±0.08^g
C₁₄	4.83±0.12^abcd	4.51±0.60^abc	0.82±0.04^def	1.81±0.08^e
C₁₅	4.50±0.17^abcde	3.74±0.42^defg	0.85±0.04^cde	1.98±0.08^d
C₁₆	5.17±0.46^ab	4.73±0.45^a	0.96±0.04^a	1.98±0.08^d
C₁₇	4.43±0.06^bcde	3.57±0.30^defgh	0.87±0.05^bcde	1.14±0.08^g
C₁₈	4.17±0.40^cde	3.57±0.52^defgh	0.83±0.11^def	1.14±0.08^g
C₁₉	4.53±0.15^abcde	3.57±0.63^defgh	0.79±0.09^ef	1.14±0.08^g
C₂₀	4.17±0.46^cde	3.57±0.46^defgh	0.83±0.05^def	1.14±0.08^g

处理 Treatment	单果重 Single fruit weight	产量 Yield	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids	可溶性糖 Soluble sugar	可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein	维生素C Vitamin C	综合评价值 Comprehensive evaluation value	排序 Sort
C₁	0.274	0.000	0.449	0.000	0.000	0.429	0.196	19
C₂	0.524	0.018	0.653	0.713	0.675	0.571	0.536	5
C₃	0.597	0.405	0.898	0.938	0.894	0.357	0.702	2
C₄	1.000	0.749	0.714	0.104	0.452	0.143	0.514	6
C₅	0.275	0.253	0.122	0.461	0.374	0.071	0.257	17
C₆	0.512	0.248	0.041	0.105	0.138	0.000	0.156	20
C₇	0.059	0.557	0.184	0.469	0.065	0.143	0.251	18
C₈	0.000	0.429	0.000	0.470	0.383	1.000	0.374	15
C₉	0.256	0.244	0.980	0.576	1.000	0.643	0.650	3
C₁₀	0.379	0.408	0.959	0.159	0.521	0.143	0.453	10
C₁₁	0.497	0.704	0.224	0.524	0.784	0.071	0.460	9
C₁₂	0.486	0.695	1.000	0.046	0.365	0.071	0.463	8
C₁₃	0.404	0.530	0.061	0.307	0.855	0.143	0.372	16
C₁₄	0.498	0.589	0.653	0.877	0.546	0.429	0.609	4
C₁₅	0.464	0.567	0.449	0.458	0.638	0.500	0.512	7
C₁₆	0.574	1.000	0.857	1.000	0.936	0.500	0.826	1
C₁₇	0.372	0.720	0.408	0.363	0.675	0.143	0.450	11
C₁₈	0.361	0.712	0.245	0.365	0.574	0.143	0.396	14
C₁₉	0.350	0.704	0.469	0.365	0.463	0.143	0.421	12
C₂₀	0.373	0.722	0.245	0.364	0.574	0.143	0.399	13

[1]	CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	XIANG Li, WANG Xian, DONG Yusheng, GUO Xiaoling, FANG Furong, CHEN Zhijun, MA Yanming, MIAO Yu. Effects of exogenous butyric acid on yield and quality of barley under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	LIU Yufang, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effects of different temperature and maturity on rot rate and quality of apricot during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197.
[9]	GONG Duorui, YANG Liling, HAN Jiang, YANG Zhongqiang, LIU Jia, WEN Yu, ZHU Zhanjiang, CUI Kuanbo. Effects of simulated cold chain transport on cell membrane lipid peroxidation and quality of apricot fruit during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207.
[10]	LI Ziqin, CHEN Ya, LI Wenqi, JIA Wenting, GUO Huijing, SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LIU Chengjiang. Effects of different precooling methods combined with H₂O₂treatment on the quality of lvtangxin winter jujube during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215.
[11]	WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[12]	DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[13]	LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[14]	HAN Shouan, WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, LIU Jiale, ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi. Effects of different light quality treatments on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903.
[15]	XIAO Lele, LI Zhiqiang, YE Jun, PU Min, RUAN Xiangyang, LIU Huaijin. Effects of combined application of peptide fertilizer and magnesium on quality and yield of suntianni seedless grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1904-1912.