Effects of Two Traps on Trapping Efficiency of Cydia pomonella under Different Control Measures

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.03.018

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the trapping effects of triangle traps and paper traps under the four conditions: the absence of control measure, synthetic sex pheromone measures, synthetic sex pheromone measures plus chemical comprehensive control and chemical control measures. 【Methods】 In 2020, various control areas were set up in the Shihezi 152th regimental farm orchard with two traps hung. From May 25 to July 27, the trapping amount and dynamics of Cydia pomonella (L. ) adults in each trap were investigated during the occurrence and hazard period of C.pomonella. 【Results】 The trapping effect of paper traps is better than triangle traps among all the prevention measures; the triangle trap had better adaptability in different weather changes than the paper trap; Among various control measures the control effect of synthetic sex pheromone control area was better than that of comprehensive control area, but the difference did not reach a significant level. The chemical control zone has the worst control effect. 【Conclusion】 The field trapping effect of paper traps is obviously better than that of triangle traps(1,494>933),Compared with chemical drugs,synthetic sex pheromone has significant effects on preventing and controlling C. pomonella(P<0.05).

Key words: Cydia pomonella(L.); pheromone trap; trapper; control measure

摘要：

【目的】研究在无防治措施、迷向丝防治措施、迷向丝+化学综合防治措施、化学防治措施4种条件下,三角型诱捕器与纸型诱捕器的诱捕效果以及各防治措施的防治效果。【方法】2020年在石河子152团果园设置各防治区,悬挂2种诱捕器,在苹果蠹蛾发生和危害期调查各诱集点的苹果蠹蛾成虫的诱捕量及发生动态。【结果】纸型诱捕器在各防治措施下的诱捕效果均好于三角型诱捕器;三角型诱捕器在不同天气变化中的适应性好于纸型诱捕器;各防治措施中,迷向丝防治区的防治效果好于综合防治区,但差异未达到显著水平,化学防治区的防治效果最差。【结论】纸型诱捕器田间诱集效果明显好于三角型诱捕器(1 494只>933只),与化药防治相比,迷向丝防治苹果蠹蛾效果显著(P<0.05)。

关键词: 苹果蠹蛾, 性诱剂, 诱捕器, 防治措施

CLC Number:

S436.611

QIN Huan, Qiaolipan Yesentai, Tamaxia Wulalibeike, SUN Huimin, FENG Likai, WANG Shaoshan. Effects of Two Traps on Trapping Efficiency of Cydia pomonella under Different Control Measures[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(3): 683-690.

秦欢, 乔力潘·也森太, 塔马夏·吾拉力别克, 孙惠敏, 冯丽凯, 王少山. 不同防治措施下2种诱捕器对苹果蠹蛾田间诱集效果比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 683-690.

Figures/Tables 7

References 25

[1]	张学祖. 苹果蠹蛾(Carpocapsa pomonella L.)在我国的新发现[J]. 昆虫学报, 1957,(4): 467-472.
	ZHANG Xuezu. A new discovery of Carpocapsa pomonella L. in China[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinca, 1957,(4): 467-472.
[2]	赵彤, 王得毓, 刘卫红, 等. 迷向防治技术对苹果蠹蛾的田间防治效果[J]. 植物保护, 2017, 43(6): 207-212.
	ZHAO Tong, WANG Deyu, LIU Weihong, et al. Control of Carpocapsa pomonella by mating disruption pheromones[J]. Plant Protection, 2017, 43(6): 207-212.
[3]	秦占毅, 刘生虎, 岳彩霞, 等. 苹果蠹蛾的危害及综合防治技术[J]. 落叶果树, 2007,(2): 40-41.
	QIN Zhanyi, LIU Shenghu,, YUE Caixia, et al. Hazards and Integrated Control Techniques of Carpocapsa pomonella L[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2007,(2): 40-41.
[4]	Roelofs W, Comeau A, Hill A, et al. Sex attractant of the codling moth:characterization with electroantennogram technique[J]. Science, 1971, 174(4006): 297-299. PMID
[5]	刘金龙, 李庆燕, 薛小连, 等. 梨小食心虫性信息素主要成分的化学合成与田间活性试验[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2015, 31(2): 268-272.
	LIU Jinlong, LI Qingyan, XUE Xiaolian, et al. Synjournal and Field Activity of Sex Pheromone Components of the Oriental Fruit Moth,Grapholitha molesta Busck (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2015, 31(2): 268-272.
[8]	杜娟, 刘彦飞, 谭树乾, 等. 基于性诱剂监测的梨小食心虫防治指标[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(2): 140-144.
	DU Juan, LIU Yanfei, TAN Shuqian, et al. Control index based on number of adults of Grapholita molesta captured by sex pheromone traps[J]. Actc Phytophylacica Sinica, 2013, 40(2): 140-144.
[9]	罗晓亮, 刘刚. 不同诱捕器监测苹果蠹蛾成虫及粘虫胶粘杀老熟幼虫效果试验[J]. 甘肃农业, 2013,(12): 56-57.
	LUO Xiaoliang, LIU Gang. Effect of Different Trap Detectors on the Monitoring of Adult and Adhesive Addiction of the Moth and Moth of Carpocapsa pomonella L to Kill the Old Mature Larvae[J]. Gansu Agriculturae, 2013,(12): 56-57.
[10]	李岩峰. 常用苹果蠹蛾诱捕器与自制喇叭口式诱捕器诱捕效果的对比试验[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2017,(8): 31-32.
	LI Yanfeng. Comparison of trapping effect of Carpocapsa pomonella L trap and self-made bell mouth trap[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2017,(8): 31-32.
[11]	王一陶. 诱捕器的空间位置对红脂大小蠹防治效果的比较研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2019,(8): 33-34.
	WANG Yitao. Comparative Study on the Control Effect of the Space Position of the Trap on Dendroctonus valens[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2019,(8): 33-34.
[12]	赵玄, 王宇磊, 沈志杰, 等. 性信息素不同配方、剂量与诱捕器类型对引诱甜菜夜蛾效果的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(5): 968-973.
	ZHAO Xuan, WANG Yulei, SHEN Zhijie, et al. Effect of different formulas,dosages of sex pheromone and trap types on male capture of Spodoptera exigua[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(5): 968-973.
[13]	薛光华, 严钧, 王文广. 性信息素监测和监防治苹果蠹蛾的应用技术研究[J]. 植物检疫, 1995, 9(4):198-201.
	XUE Guanghua, YAN Jun, WANG Wenguang. Application of sex pheromone monitoring and control of Carpocapsa pomonella L[J]. Plant Quarantine, 1995, 9(4): 198-201.
[14]	Kondel J J, Arthur M A J. Field comparison of nonsticky and pheromone traps for monitoring fruit pests in western New York[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1990, 83(1):197-204. DOI URL
[15]	王飞高, 易为, 樊建庭. 性信息素诱杀山地果园梨小食心虫效果比较[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2010, (2):41-43.
	WANG Feigao, YI Wei, FAN Jianting. Comparison of sex pheromones in the trapping effect of Crapholitha molesta in the mountainous orchards[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2010, (2):41-43.
[16]	翟小伟, 刘万学, 张桂芬, 等. 苹果蠹蛾性信息素诱捕器田间诱捕效应影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, (3):801-806. PMID
	ZHAI Xiaowei, LIU Wanxue, ZHANG Guifen, et al. Affecting factors on capture efficacy of sex pheromone traps for Cydia pomonella L[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, (3):801-806. PMID
[17]	杜磊, 张润志, 蒲崇建. 两种苹果蠹蛾性引诱剂诱捕器诱捕效率比较及地面植被的影响[J]. 昆虫知识, 2007, 44(2):233-237.
	DU Lei, ZHANG Runzhi, PU Chongjian, et al. Efficiency of two types of pheromone traps in capturing adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella, and influences by ground vegetation cover plants[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology, 2007, 44(2): 233-237.
[18]	张新平, 岳朝阳, 刘爱华, 等. 不同诱捕方法对苹果蠹蛾和梨小食心虫的诱捕效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(2): 306-310.
	ZHANG Xinping, YUE Chaoyang, LIU Aihua, et al. Trapping Efficiency of Cydia Pomonella L.and Grapholitha molesta Busck by Different Trapping Methods[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(2): 306-310.
[19]	Epstein D L, Zack R S, Brunner J F, et al. Effectsofbroad-spec-trum insecticides on epigeal arthropod biodiversity in PacificNorthwestappleorchards[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2000, 29(2): 340-348. DOI URL
[20]	Makranczy G, Toth M, Chambon J, et al. Sex pheromone of pear moth,Cydia pyrivora[J]. BioControl, 1998, 43(3): 339-344. DOI URL
[21]	Sumedrea M, Marin F C, Calinescu M, et al. Researches regarding the use of mating disruption pheromones in control of apple codling moth-Cydia pomonella L.[J]. Agriculture & Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015,(6): 171-178.
[22]	陈汉杰, 曹川建, 雷银山, 等. 不同剂型迷向剂处理对苹果蠹蛾控制效果比较[J]. 生物安全学报, 2015,(4): 315-319.
	CHEN Hanjie, CAO Chuanjian, LEI Yinshan, et al. Comparison of control efficiency of mating disruption by using different sex pheromone dispensers against codling moth (Cydia pomonella)[J]. Journa of Biosafety, 2015,(4): 315-319.
[23]	张煜, 李虎, 张莉. 苹果蠹蛾性信息素迷向防治技术效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012,(18): 104-105.
	ZHANG Yu, LI Hu, ZHANG Li. A Study on the Technical Effect of Cathode Control on the Sex Informatics of Cydia pomonella L.[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012,(18): 104-105.
[24]	魏玉红, 罗进仓, 周昭旭, 等. 信息素迷向技术防治苹果蠹蛾试验初报[J]. 中国果树, 2010,(3): 48-50.
	WEI Yuhong, LUO Jincang, ZHOU Zhaoxu, et al. Preliminary report on the control of Cydia pomonella L with pheromone mixiang technology[J]. China Fruits, 2010,(3): 48-50.
[25]	李兴龙, 张馨月, 雷岳杰, 等. 石河子垦区果树食心虫迷向技术[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1): 173-180. DOI
	LI Xinglong, ZHANG Xinyue, LEI Yuejie, et al. Study on the Mating Disruption Control Technology of Fruit Borer in Shihezi Reclamation Area[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(1): 173-180. DOI

防治措施 Control measures	诱捕器类型 Trap type	日均诱捕量 Mean of daily catch	最高单日诱捕量 Maximum one-day catch	相对诱捕率 Relative catch rate(%)	累计诱捕量 Total catches
无防治 No control measures	三角型诱捕器	8.52±0.39	34	11.78	225^bvABC
无防治 No control measures	纸型诱捕器	14.78±0.46^*	63	20.89	399^avA
迷向丝防治 Synthetic sex pheromone	三角型诱捕器	2.48±0.34	14	3.51	672^cvC
迷向丝防治 Synthetic sex pheromone	纸型诱捕器	5.78±0.81^*	32	8.17	156^bcC
综合防治 Integrated control	三角型诱捕器	4.52±0.40	29	5.92	113^bcC
综合防治 Integrated control	纸型诱捕器	7.33±0.85	36	10.84	207^bvBC
化学防治 Chemical control	三角型诱捕器	13.11±1.12	61	18.53	354^avAB
化学防治 Chemical control	纸型诱捕器	14.41±1.15	61	20.37	389^avA
总诱捕量 All catches	三角型诱捕器	34.56±4.74	140	38.44	933
总诱捕量 All catches	纸型诱捕器	55.33±4.09	154	64.56	1 494

防治措施 Control measures	诱捕器类型 Trap type	日均诱捕量 Mean of daily catch	最高单日诱捕量 Maximum one-day catch	相对诱捕率 Relative catch rate(%)	累计诱捕量 Total catches
无防治 No control measures	三角型诱捕器	8.52±0.39	34	11.78	225^bvABC
无防治 No control measures	纸型诱捕器	14.78±0.46^*	63	20.89	399^avA
迷向丝防治 Synthetic sex pheromone	三角型诱捕器	2.48±0.34	14	3.51	672^cvC
迷向丝防治 Synthetic sex pheromone	纸型诱捕器	5.78±0.81^*	32	8.17	156^bcC
综合防治 Integrated control	三角型诱捕器	4.52±0.40	29	5.92	113^bcC
综合防治 Integrated control	纸型诱捕器	7.33±0.85	36	10.84	207^bvBC
化学防治 Chemical control	三角型诱捕器	13.11±1.12	61	18.53	354^avAB
化学防治 Chemical control	纸型诱捕器	14.41±1.15	61	20.37	389^avA
总诱捕量 All catches	三角型诱捕器	34.56±4.74	140	38.44	933
总诱捕量 All catches	纸型诱捕器	55.33±4.09	154	64.56	1 494