Dormancy characteristics and breaking methods of Archangelica decurrens seeds

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.12.027

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The research aimed to explore the seed dormancy characteristics of Archangelica decurrens Ledeb.and find out the method of breaking dormancy, so as to provide scientific basis for the protection, development and utilization of germplasm resources of this species.【Methods】With wild seeds of A.decurrens as research materials, the basic biological characteristics of fruits and seeds and seed germination inhibitors were studied by laboratory control experiments, and the effects of cold stratification treatment and gibberellin treatment with different concentrations and time on the germination rate, germination potential and germination index of seeds were analyzed.【Results】The seed coat did not hinder the water absorption of the seeds; the seed powder extract had a significant inhibitory effect on the seed germination and seedling growth of Brassica pekinensis; 30-50 d cold stratification treatment could significantly improve the seed germination rate of A.decurrens; seed embryo development was incomplete when fruit morphologically matured, and cold stratification could promote seed embryo development; seed soaking with 3,000 mg/L gibberellin for 24 h could significantly increase the seed germination rate to 72.00%.【Conclusion】The seed dormancy of A.decurrens is the morphophysiological dormancy caused by the combined action of germination inhibitor in the seed and incomplete embryo development.The seeds were cold stratified for 30-50 d before sowing or using 2000-4000 mg/L gibberellin soaking the seeds for 24 h can effectively break seed dormancy and promote seed germination.

Key words: Archangelica decurrens Ledeb; seed dormancy; morphophysiological dormancy; stratification; gibberellin

摘要：

【目的】研究下延叶古当归(Archangelica decurrens Ledeb.)种子休眠特性并找到解除休眠的方法,为该物种种质资源保护和开发利用提供科学依据。【方法】以下延叶古当归野生种子为材料,通过室内控制实验法对果实和种子基本生物学特性、种子萌发抑制物质进行研究,分析低温层积处理以及赤霉素不同浓度和时间交互处理对其萌发率、萌发势、萌发指数的影响。【结果】种皮不阻碍种子吸水;种子粉末浸取液对白菜(Brassica pekinensis)种子萌发及幼苗生长具有显著抑制作用;30~50 d低温层积处理能极显著提高下延叶古当归种子萌发率;果实形态成熟时种胚发育不完全,低温层积能促进种胚发育;使用3 000mg/L赤霉素浸种24 h可使种子萌发率显著提升至72.00%。【结论】下延叶古当归种子休眠是由种子内萌发抑制物和种胚发育不完全共同作用引起的形态生理休眠,播种前将种子低温层积30~50 d,或使用2 000~4 000 mg/L浓度的赤霉素浸种24 h可有效解除种子休眠从而促进种子萌发。

关键词: 下延叶古当归, 种子休眠, 形态生理休眠, 层积, 赤霉素

CLC Number:

XU Shanshan, WANG Huanyu, LU Ting, LIU Aimin. Dormancy characteristics and breaking methods of Archangelica decurrens seeds[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 3094-3101.

徐珊珊, 王环宇, 陆婷, 刘爱民. 下延叶古当归种子休眠特性与解除方法[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3094-3101.

Figures/Tables 7

References 28

[1]	王宇婷, 刘玫, 程薪宇. 中国伞形科当归属及相关类群毛状体和果实结构的系统学价值[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):66-75. DOI
	WANG Yuting, LIU Mei, CHENG Xinyu. Trichomes and fruit structures of Angelica and related genera of the family Apiaceae and their taxonomic significance[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(4):66-75. DOI
[2]	任姗姗. 新疆北塔山地区植物物种多样性研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2014.
	REN Shanshan. The Study of Species Diversity of Plants in Beita Mountain, Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2014.
[3]	中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.
	Editorial Committee of the Flora of China. Flora of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992.
[4]	袁昌齐. 中国伞形科药用植物概要[J]. 中国中药杂志, 1986(1):5-9.
	YUAN Changqi. Summary of medicinal plants of Apiaceae in China[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 1986(1):5-9.
[5]	Shchipitsyna O S, Efremov A A. Features of the Essential oil Accumulation in theAngelica Decurrens(Ledeb.) B. Fedtsch. Roots in Comparison withAngelica Archangelica L.[J]. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Chemistry, 2014, 7(4):590.
[6]	廖晨阳, 何兴金, 马祥光. 中国广义当归属及其相关类群的叶柄结构研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(1):90-98.
	LIAO Chenyang, HE Xingjin, MA Xiangguang. Anatomical Study on Petiole ofAngelica sensu latoand Its Allies from China[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(1):90-98.
[7]	王鑫, 袁庆军, 郭增祥, 等. 野生当归种子的生物学特性研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45(10):2368-2373.
	WANG Xin, YUAN Qingjun, GUO Zengxiang, et al. Biological characteristics of wild Angelica sinensis seed[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2020, 45(10):2368-2373.
[8]	肖生旺, 方向文, 蒋志荣, 等. 温水浸种和IAA溶液浸种对当归种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(5):1265-1270.
	XIAO Shengwang, FANG Xiangwen, JIANG Zhirong, et al. Effects of warm water soaking and IAA soaking on germination of Angelica sinensis seeds[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(5):1265-1270.
[9]	Vandelook F, Bolle N, Van Assche J A. Multiple environmental signals required for embryo growth and germination of seeds ofSelinum carvifolia (L.) and Angelica sylvestrisL.(Apiaceae)[J]. Seed Science Research, 2007, 17(4):283-291. DOI URL
[10]	Zhang K, Zhang Y, Walck J L, et al. Non-deep simple morphophysiological dormancy in seeds ofAngelica keiskei (Apiaceae)[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 255:202-208. DOI URL
[11]	刘志勇, 张金波, 王威, 等. 保护新疆植物种质资源合理开展资源创新与利用[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(9):1696-1700.
	LIU Zhiyong, ZHANG Jinbo, WANG Wei, et al. Rescue and Protect Xinjiang Plant Germplasm Resources and Develop Their Innovations and Utilize them with Reason[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(9):1696-1700.
[12]	时凯旋, 赵凯旋, 訾明茹, 等. 知母种子质量检验方法研究[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(9):143-146.
	SHI Kaixuan, ZHAO Kaixuan, ZI Mingru, et al. Study On Quality Inspection Method of Anemarrhena Seeds[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(9):143-146.
[13]	胡胜, 马鑫, 陈晨, 等. 洪平杏的种子生物学特性研究[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021:1-14.
	HU Sheng, MA Xin, CHEN Chen, et al. Study on Biological Characteristics of Seeds inArmeniaca hongpingensis[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021:1-14.
[14]	孙佳, 郭江帆, 魏朔南. 植物种子萌发抑制物研究概述[J]. 种子, 2012, 31(4):57-61.
	SUN Jia, GUO Jiangfan, WEI Shuonan. Overview on Inhibitors of Plant Seed Germination[J]. Seed, 2012, 31(4):57-61.
[15]	李询, 董诚明, 邢冰, 等. 多花黄精种子萌发抑制物特性研究[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(6):3.
	LI Xun, DONG Chengming, XING Bing, et al. Study on the Characteristics of Seed Uermination Inhibitors of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(6):3.
[16]	温日宇, 刘建霞, 张珍华, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同藜麦种子萌发及生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(1):121-126.
	WEN Riyu, LIU Jianxia, ZHANG Zhenhua, et al. Effects of Drought Stress on Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Different Quinoa Seeds[J]. Crops, 2019,(1):121-126.
[17]	仇云云. 11个种源紫斑牡丹种子休眠原因与破眠技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2017.
	QIU Yunyun. Study on the Dormancy Causes Technique and Dormancy Breaking of Paeonia rockii Seeds from 11 Provenances[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2017.
[18]	张雪霞. 变温层积过程中老山芹种子后熟特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2018.
	ZHANG Xuexia. Study on the After-ripening Characteristics of Heracleum moellendorffii Hance Seeds during the Process of Variable Temperature Stratifications[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2018.
[19]	付长珍, 王新村, 杨相波, 等. 拟巫山淫羊藿种子休眠特性的初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(18):76-80.
	FU Changzhen, WANG Xincun, YANG Xiangbo, et al. Preliminary Study on Seed Dormancy Characteristics ofEpimedium pseudowushanense[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(18):76-80.
[20]	李啟萌, 宗宪春. 盐胁迫对红黄两种秋葵种子萌发的影响[J]. 中国林副特产, 2021,(2):4-6,8.
	LI Qimeng, ZONG Xianchun. Effect of Salt Stress on Seed Germination of Red and Yellow Okra[J]. Forest By-Product and Speciality in China, 2021,(2):4-6,8.
[21]	雷春英, 吉小敏, 彭钼植, 等. 不同类型盐分对盐爪爪种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5):6.
	LEI Chunying, JI Xiaomin, PENG Muzhi, et al. Effects of sodium salinity stress types on the germination of Kalidium foliatum seeds and its young seedling growth[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(5):6.
[22]	Baskin J M, Baskin C C. A classification system for seed dormancy[J]. Seed Science Research, 2004, 14(1):1-16. DOI URL
[23]	吴海波, 宋博洋, 张烁, 等. 种子休眠与萌发研究中若干问题的探讨[J]. 种子, 2017, 36(1):76-81.
	WU Haibo, SONG Boyang, ZHANG Shuo, et al. Discuss of Some Common Misconceptions and Issues Concerning in Seed Dormancy and Germination[J]. Seed, 2017, 36(1):76-81.
[24]	王蕾, 黄俊华, 王佳琪, 等. 大白花贝母形态休眠期种子内含物变化对种胚发育的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(5):1674-1680.
	WANG Lei, HUANG Junhua, WANG Jiaqi, et al. Effects of the Change of Seed Inclusions in the Morphological Dormancy ofFritillaries verticillata var. ALbidoflora on Seed Embryo Development[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(5):1674-1680.
[25]	魏朝阳. 冬青种子休眠机理及解除方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2007.
	WEI Zhaoyang, Studies on the Mechanisms and Breaking Methods of Ilex purpurea Seed Dormancy[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[26]	Yuan ZH, Wang CT, Li SP, et al. Effects of differentplan thormones or PEG seed soaking on maize resistance to drought stress[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2014, 94:1491-1499. DOI URL
[27]	黄宁, 刘革宁, 杨继生, 等. 赤霉素浓度和浸种时间对枫香种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(3):97-101.
	HUANG Ning, LIU Gening, YANG Jisheng, et al. Effects of Gibberellin Concentration and Soaking Seed Time on Seed Germination ofLiquidambar formosanaHance[J]. Seed, 2021, 40(3):97-101.
[28]	罗登攀, 刘道凤, 马婧, 等. 蜡梅种子休眠原因浅析及赤霉素对种子萌发的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2015,(1):83-86.
	LUO Pandeng, LIU Daofeng, MA Jing, et al. Inhibiting Substance and Effect of GA3 on the Seed Germination ofChimonanthus praecox (L.) Link Seed[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015,(1):83-86.

种子萌发指标 Seed germination indicator	对照组 Control group	处理组 Treatment group	幼苗生长指标 Seedling growth indicator	对照组 Control group	处理组 Treatment group
萌发率 Germination rate(%)	98.0±1.63^Aa	10.7±6.18^Bb	下胚轴长 Hypocotyl length(mm)	9.96±1.54^Aa	9.74±0.70^Aa
萌发势 Germination potential(%)	44.0±2.83^Aa	2.0±1.63^Bb	鲜重 Fresh weight(g)	1.40±0.11^Aa	0.87±0.14^Ab
萌发指数 Germination index	38.0±1.47^Aa	1.5±1.22^Bb	根长 Root length(mm)	14.67±1.01^Aa	9.59±0.32^Bb

种子萌发指标 Seed germination indicator	对照组 Control group	处理组 Treatment group	幼苗生长指标 Seedling growth indicator	对照组 Control group	处理组 Treatment group
萌发率 Germination rate(%)	98.0±1.63^Aa	10.7±6.18^Bb	下胚轴长 Hypocotyl length(mm)	9.96±1.54^Aa	9.74±0.70^Aa
萌发势 Germination potential(%)	44.0±2.83^Aa	2.0±1.63^Bb	鲜重 Fresh weight(g)	1.40±0.11^Aa	0.87±0.14^Ab
萌发指数 Germination index	38.0±1.47^Aa	1.5±1.22^Bb	根长 Root length(mm)	14.67±1.01^Aa	9.59±0.32^Bb

层积天数 Stratification days(d)	萌发率 Germination rate(%)	差异显著性 Significance of difference		萌发势 Germination potential(%)	差异显著性 Significance of difference		萌发指数 Germination index	差异显著性 Significance of difference
层积天数 Stratification days(d)	萌发率 Germination rate(%)	0.05	0.01	萌发势 Germination potential(%)	0.05	0.01	萌发指数 Germination index	0.05	0.01
0	6.67	c	C	3.33	c	C	0.47	e	C
10	12.00	bc	BC	8.00	c	BC	0.63	e	C
20	20.00	b	B	7.33	c	BC	1.24	d	C
30	60.00	a	A	17.33	b	B	3.55	c	B
40	61.33	a	A	29.33	a	A	4.86	b	A
50	66.67	a	A	35.33	a	A	5.62	a	A

层积天数 Stratification days(d)	萌发率 Germination rate(%)	差异显著性 Significance of difference		萌发势 Germination potential(%)	差异显著性 Significance of difference		萌发指数 Germination index	差异显著性 Significance of difference
层积天数 Stratification days(d)	萌发率 Germination rate(%)	0.05	0.01	萌发势 Germination potential(%)	0.05	0.01	萌发指数 Germination index	0.05	0.01
0	6.67	c	C	3.33	c	C	0.47	e	C
10	12.00	bc	BC	8.00	c	BC	0.63	e	C
20	20.00	b	B	7.33	c	BC	1.24	d	C
30	60.00	a	A	17.33	b	B	3.55	c	B
40	61.33	a	A	29.33	a	A	4.86	b	A
50	66.67	a	A	35.33	a	A	5.62	a	A

层积天数 Stratification days(d)	胚率 Embryo rate(%)	胚率差异显著性 Embryo rate significance of difference
层积天数 Stratification days(d)	胚率 Embryo rate(%)	0.05	0.01
0	15.70	d	C
10	18.03	cd	BC
20	19.13	c	B
30	20.23	c	B
40	24.69	b	A
50	27.67	a	A