Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 781-790.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.001
• Standard Production Technology Research Column of Safflower • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIA Donghia1, SONG Xianming1,2, GU Yuanguo1, LI Qiang1(), ZENG Youling2, MIAO Haocui1, GUO Meili3, HOU Xianfei1()
Received:
2023-09-03
Online:
2024-04-20
Published:
2024-05-31
Correspondence author:
LI Qiang, HOU Xianfei
Supported by:
贾东海1, 宋贤明1,2, 顾元国1, 李强1(), 曾幼玲2, 苗昊翠1, 郭美丽3, 侯献飞1()
通讯作者:
李强,侯献飞
作者简介:
贾东海(1980- ),男,新疆人,研究员,研究方向为油料作物育种与栽培,(E-mail)545507831@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
JIA Donghia, SONG Xianming, GU Yuanguo, LI Qiang, ZENG Youling, MIAO Haocui, GUO Meili, HOU Xianfei. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 781-790.
贾东海, 宋贤明, 顾元国, 李强, 曾幼玲, 苗昊翠, 郭美丽, 侯献飞. 化肥减量配施微生物菌肥对膜下滴灌红花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 781-790.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.001
生育时期 Growth period | 处理 Treatments | 株高Plant height(cm) | 茎粗Stem thick(cm) | 根长Root length(cm) | 叶片数Leaves number(个) | 分枝数Branchs number(个) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | ||
伸长期 Elongation stage | CK | 3.2±1.27ab | 12.8±1.51c | 4.4±0.77b | 5.6±0.89a | 7.9±2.75a | 12.3±3.11a | 9.3±1.52a | 8.3±0.58a | / | / |
CF | 2.2±1.39b | 13.4±1.01bc | 5.6±0.4a | 6.3±0.3a | 8.3±1.24a | 9.8±2.33a | 10.7±1.53a | 8±1a | / | / | |
OF | 6.1±1.54a | 13.3±0.65c | 4.9±0.69ab | 6±0.71a | 8.6±1.43a | 11.5±2.35a | 9.7±1.15a | 8±1a | / | / | |
CF+25M | 3.1±0.65ab | 15.7±0.87a | 5.3±0.99ab | 6.4±0.27a | 9.9±1.06a | 12.5±1.73a | 9.7±1.53a | 8.7±1.15a | / | / | |
CF+37.5M | 3.7±0.91ab | 15.1±0.42ab | 5.6±0.3a | 5.9±0.37a | 7.6±1.63a | 11.1±0.75a | 11±1a | 8.3±2.08a | / | / | |
CF+50M | 4.6±0.68ab | 15.7±1.17a | 6±0.73a | 6.5±0.4a | 9.4±1.68a | 12±1.76a | 10.7±1.53a | 8±1a | / | / | |
分枝期 Branching stage | CK | 19.1±0.83b | 35.6±1.4c | 6.7±1.3b | 7.3±0.66b | 10.1±0.96a | 14.9±1.71b | 18.3±1.31a | 19.3±1.15c | / | / |
CF | 21.4±0.91ab | 42.8±1.93ab | 8.1±0.33a | 8.1±0.81ab | 12.5±1.67a | 16.6±0.9a | 19.7±1.52a | 22.7±0.58ab | / | / | |
OF | 20.3±0.98ab | 40.4±2.48b | 8.2±1.3a | 7.5±1.55b | 12.3±0.76a | 16.2±0.12a | 16±1b | 20.7±1.15c | / | / | |
CF+25M | 21.1±0.95ab | 44±1.9a | 7.5±0.62a | 8.4±0.43ab | 11.8±1.66a | 15.9±1.65a | 18±1.36a | 24.3±0.58a | / | / | |
CF+37.5M | 25.7±1.69a | 48.5±1.49a | 8.9±0.71a | 9.1±0.54a | 9.4±1.65b | 17.3±2.57a | 19±1a | 24.7±0.58a | / | / | |
CF+50M | 23.1±1.17a | 42.9±1.82ab | 7.4±0.76a | 7.6±0.44b | 10.5±1.44a | 17.4±1.05a | 19.3±1.53a | 24.7±1.15a | / | / | |
现蕾期 Budding stage | CK | 55.6±3.84b | 70.8±2.2c | 7.8±0.2c | 8.5±0.32b | 15.2±1.2b | 17.5±1bc | 67.7±2.15c | 101±11.2c | 6.5±1c | 10.3±1.1b |
CF | 65.9±3.09ab | 74.6±1.08ab | 8.9±0.62b | 9.9±0.35a | 18.9±1.17ab | 18.6±1.96abc | 90.3±3.65ab | 112.7±6.56bc | 7±2.65bc | 10±2.06b | |
OF | 63.6±2.75ab | 78.8±1.5a | 11.4±1.32a | 9.6±0.52a | 18.5±1.1ab | 20.5±1.1ab | 91±3.38ab | 152±11.35ab | 8±2abc | 11.7±1.53a | |
CF+25M | 65.9±3.95ab | 74.4±1.97bc | 9.2±0.2b | 9.5±1.12a | 18.7±1.97ab | 19.5±1.7ab | 89±3.05ab | 149±7.17ab | 9.7±1.53ab | 13.3±1a | |
CF+37.5M | 70±2.36a | 77.7±2.8a | 11.6±1.15a | 10.2±0.53a | 20.1±2.35a | 21.7±2.08a | 109.7±3.76a | 183±10.24a | 11±2.65a | 12.7±1.06a | |
CF+50M | 57.1±3.03b | 72.3±2c | 9.3±0.52b | 9.3±0.91a | 15.8±1.37b | 16.8±1.63c | 98.3±3.13ab | 138±9.51b | 9.7±1.53ab | 9.7±1.08b | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 65.1±2.4b | 71±1.05b | 9.9±0.72b | 9.1±0.43b | 17.1±2.39a | 18.2±2.96a | 100.3±9.66c | 158.3±9.68c | 10.7±0.89b | 8.3±0.58c |
CF | 70.2±3.77a | 76.3±3.62ab | 13.7±2.29a | 11.5±0.94a | 19.4±2.95a | 21.1±5.5a | 133±8.53bc | 179±10.03b | 10.7±2b | 9.3±1.15b | |
OF | 73.2±3.37a | 79.9±2.72a | 12.8±2.56a | 10.5±0.68a | 18.6±2.84a | 20.4±2.36a | 170.7±5.08b | 173.3±11.65b | 12.3±1.65ab | 9.3±0.58b | |
CF+25M | 71.5±2.79a | 76.7±1.55ab | 12±1.49ab | 10.2±0.63a | 18.9±1.57a | 20.7±2.61a | 195±10.59a | 257±9.58a | 15±0.58a | 13.3±1.15a | |
CF+37.5M | 73.5±4.64a | 81.6±4.26a | 11.9±0.71ab | 10.8±0.99a | 20.8±3.27a | 22.5±1.69a | 226.7±8.26a | 259±12.13a | 14±1.61a | 15±2.65a | |
CF+50M | 70.6±2.26a | 75.3±3.51ab | 10.9±0.96ab | 9.6±1.21ab | 18.1±1.77a | 18.9±2.6a | 175.7±8.17ab | 248±10.15a | 10.3±1.31b | 14.3±2.31a |
Tab.1 Changes of agronomic traits of Carthamus tinctorius L. under different treatments
生育时期 Growth period | 处理 Treatments | 株高Plant height(cm) | 茎粗Stem thick(cm) | 根长Root length(cm) | 叶片数Leaves number(个) | 分枝数Branchs number(个) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | ||
伸长期 Elongation stage | CK | 3.2±1.27ab | 12.8±1.51c | 4.4±0.77b | 5.6±0.89a | 7.9±2.75a | 12.3±3.11a | 9.3±1.52a | 8.3±0.58a | / | / |
CF | 2.2±1.39b | 13.4±1.01bc | 5.6±0.4a | 6.3±0.3a | 8.3±1.24a | 9.8±2.33a | 10.7±1.53a | 8±1a | / | / | |
OF | 6.1±1.54a | 13.3±0.65c | 4.9±0.69ab | 6±0.71a | 8.6±1.43a | 11.5±2.35a | 9.7±1.15a | 8±1a | / | / | |
CF+25M | 3.1±0.65ab | 15.7±0.87a | 5.3±0.99ab | 6.4±0.27a | 9.9±1.06a | 12.5±1.73a | 9.7±1.53a | 8.7±1.15a | / | / | |
CF+37.5M | 3.7±0.91ab | 15.1±0.42ab | 5.6±0.3a | 5.9±0.37a | 7.6±1.63a | 11.1±0.75a | 11±1a | 8.3±2.08a | / | / | |
CF+50M | 4.6±0.68ab | 15.7±1.17a | 6±0.73a | 6.5±0.4a | 9.4±1.68a | 12±1.76a | 10.7±1.53a | 8±1a | / | / | |
分枝期 Branching stage | CK | 19.1±0.83b | 35.6±1.4c | 6.7±1.3b | 7.3±0.66b | 10.1±0.96a | 14.9±1.71b | 18.3±1.31a | 19.3±1.15c | / | / |
CF | 21.4±0.91ab | 42.8±1.93ab | 8.1±0.33a | 8.1±0.81ab | 12.5±1.67a | 16.6±0.9a | 19.7±1.52a | 22.7±0.58ab | / | / | |
OF | 20.3±0.98ab | 40.4±2.48b | 8.2±1.3a | 7.5±1.55b | 12.3±0.76a | 16.2±0.12a | 16±1b | 20.7±1.15c | / | / | |
CF+25M | 21.1±0.95ab | 44±1.9a | 7.5±0.62a | 8.4±0.43ab | 11.8±1.66a | 15.9±1.65a | 18±1.36a | 24.3±0.58a | / | / | |
CF+37.5M | 25.7±1.69a | 48.5±1.49a | 8.9±0.71a | 9.1±0.54a | 9.4±1.65b | 17.3±2.57a | 19±1a | 24.7±0.58a | / | / | |
CF+50M | 23.1±1.17a | 42.9±1.82ab | 7.4±0.76a | 7.6±0.44b | 10.5±1.44a | 17.4±1.05a | 19.3±1.53a | 24.7±1.15a | / | / | |
现蕾期 Budding stage | CK | 55.6±3.84b | 70.8±2.2c | 7.8±0.2c | 8.5±0.32b | 15.2±1.2b | 17.5±1bc | 67.7±2.15c | 101±11.2c | 6.5±1c | 10.3±1.1b |
CF | 65.9±3.09ab | 74.6±1.08ab | 8.9±0.62b | 9.9±0.35a | 18.9±1.17ab | 18.6±1.96abc | 90.3±3.65ab | 112.7±6.56bc | 7±2.65bc | 10±2.06b | |
OF | 63.6±2.75ab | 78.8±1.5a | 11.4±1.32a | 9.6±0.52a | 18.5±1.1ab | 20.5±1.1ab | 91±3.38ab | 152±11.35ab | 8±2abc | 11.7±1.53a | |
CF+25M | 65.9±3.95ab | 74.4±1.97bc | 9.2±0.2b | 9.5±1.12a | 18.7±1.97ab | 19.5±1.7ab | 89±3.05ab | 149±7.17ab | 9.7±1.53ab | 13.3±1a | |
CF+37.5M | 70±2.36a | 77.7±2.8a | 11.6±1.15a | 10.2±0.53a | 20.1±2.35a | 21.7±2.08a | 109.7±3.76a | 183±10.24a | 11±2.65a | 12.7±1.06a | |
CF+50M | 57.1±3.03b | 72.3±2c | 9.3±0.52b | 9.3±0.91a | 15.8±1.37b | 16.8±1.63c | 98.3±3.13ab | 138±9.51b | 9.7±1.53ab | 9.7±1.08b | |
开花期 Flowering stage | CK | 65.1±2.4b | 71±1.05b | 9.9±0.72b | 9.1±0.43b | 17.1±2.39a | 18.2±2.96a | 100.3±9.66c | 158.3±9.68c | 10.7±0.89b | 8.3±0.58c |
CF | 70.2±3.77a | 76.3±3.62ab | 13.7±2.29a | 11.5±0.94a | 19.4±2.95a | 21.1±5.5a | 133±8.53bc | 179±10.03b | 10.7±2b | 9.3±1.15b | |
OF | 73.2±3.37a | 79.9±2.72a | 12.8±2.56a | 10.5±0.68a | 18.6±2.84a | 20.4±2.36a | 170.7±5.08b | 173.3±11.65b | 12.3±1.65ab | 9.3±0.58b | |
CF+25M | 71.5±2.79a | 76.7±1.55ab | 12±1.49ab | 10.2±0.63a | 18.9±1.57a | 20.7±2.61a | 195±10.59a | 257±9.58a | 15±0.58a | 13.3±1.15a | |
CF+37.5M | 73.5±4.64a | 81.6±4.26a | 11.9±0.71ab | 10.8±0.99a | 20.8±3.27a | 22.5±1.69a | 226.7±8.26a | 259±12.13a | 14±1.61a | 15±2.65a | |
CF+50M | 70.6±2.26a | 75.3±3.51ab | 10.9±0.96ab | 9.6±1.21ab | 18.1±1.77a | 18.9±2.6a | 175.7±8.17ab | 248±10.15a | 10.3±1.31b | 14.3±2.31a |
Fig.1 Relative chlorophyll content of Carthamus tinctorius L. under different treatments Note: ES, BP, BS and FS were elongation stage, branching period, squaring stage and flowering stage, respectively of Carthamus tinctorius L.
Fig.2 Changes of total dry matter accumulation and accumulation rate of Carthamus tinctorius L. under different treatments Note: SS, ES, BP, BS and FS were sowing stage, elongation stage, branching period, squaring stage and flowering stage, respectively of Carthamus tinctorius L.
Fig.4 Yield and yield components of Carthamus tinctorius L. under different treatments Note:A, B and C were the yield components, filament yield and grain yield from 2020 to 2021, respectively of Carthamus tinctorius L.
Fig.5 Correlation analysis of Carthamus tinctorius L. yield and composition factors Note: *, ** and *** represents significant correlation at P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively. FBNPP, SNPP, TSW, FY and GY represents fruit ball number per plant, seed number per pod, thousand seed weight, filament yield and grain yield, respectively
[1] | 杨滨键, 尚杰, 于法稳. 农业面源污染防治的难点、问题及对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(2): 236-245. |
YANG Binjian, SHANG Jie, YU Fawen. Difficulty, problems and countermeasures of agricultural non-point sources pollution control in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(2): 236-245. | |
[2] | 刘钦普. 中国化肥施用强度及环境安全阈值时空变化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(6): 214-221. |
LIU Qinpu. Spatio-temporal changes of fertilization intensity and environmental safety threshold in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(6): 214-221. | |
[3] | 汪粮荐. 中国化学肥料的发展与其农业应用分析[J]. 山西农经, 2018,(10): 103, 108. |
WANG Liangjian. Development of chemical fertilizer and its agricultural application in China[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Economy, 2018,(10): 103, 108. | |
[4] | 汤明尧, 沈重阳, 傅国海, 等. 新疆种植业化肥施用情况调查与分析[J]. 农业工程, 2021, 11(5): 132-136. |
TANG Mingyao, SHEN Chongyang, FU Guohai, et al. Investigation and analysis of fertilizer application of planting industry in Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 11(5): 132-136. | |
[5] | 刘钦普, 濮励杰. 中国与主要发达国家化肥施用配置及效率对比分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(6): 328-335. |
LIU Qinpu, PU Lijie. Comparation of fertilizer allocation and integrated efficiency between China and major developed countries[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,(6): 328-335. | |
[6] |
贺怀杰, 王振华, 郑旭荣, 等. 水氮耦合对膜下滴灌棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(11): 1983-1989.
DOI |
HE Huaijie, WANG Zhenhua, ZHENG Xurong, et al. Effects of water-nitrogen coupling on growth and yield of cotton under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(11): 1983-1989.
DOI |
|
[7] | 马征, 崔荣宗, 贾德, 等. 氮磷钾平衡施用对大葱产量、养分吸收及利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(3): 109-114. |
MA Zheng, CUI Rongzong, JIA De, et al. Effects of N, P and K balanced fertilization on Welsh onion yield, nutrient uptake and utilization[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,(3): 109-114. | |
[8] | 马静. 生物有机肥对不同土壤生物活性和油菜产量品质的影响[D]. 太古: 山西农业大学, 2017. |
MA Jing. Effect of bioorganic fertilizer application on biological activity and yield and quality of rape in different soils[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017. | |
[9] | 聂文翰. 基于秸秆堆肥和水肥一体化的化肥减量技术研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017. |
NIE Wenhan. Study on Fertilizer Reduction Technique Based on Straw Composts and Fertigation System[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. | |
[10] | 吕凤莲, 侯苗苗, 张弘弢, 等. 塿土冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系有机肥替代化肥比例研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1): 22-32. |
LYU Fenglian, HOU Miaomiao, ZHANG Hongtao, et al. Replacement ratio of chemical fertilizer nitrogen with manure under the winter wheat-summer maize rotation system in Lou soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1): 22-32. | |
[11] |
赵婧文, 张庆伟, 李政, 等. 膜下滴灌施用生物有机肥对土壤盐分及棉花产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(3): 102-108.
DOI |
ZHAO Jingwen, ZHANG Qingwei, LI Zheng, et al. Effects of drip irrigation under plastic film and bio-organic fertilizer on soil salinity and cotton yield[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3): 102-108.
DOI |
|
[12] | 候丽丽, 王伟, 崔新菊, 等. 化肥减量配施有机肥对小麦生长、光合和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(4): 475-482. |
HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, et al. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with organic fertilizer application on growth, photosynthesis and yield of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(4): 475-482. | |
[13] | Ibukunoluwa Moyin-Jesu E. Use of different organic fertilizers on soil fertility improvement, growth and head yield parameters of cabbage (Brassica Oleraceae L)[J]. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2015, 4(4): 291-298. |
[14] |
李菊, 高程斐, 马宁, 等. 化肥减量配施生物有机肥对松花菜养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(6): 153-162.
DOI |
LI Ju, GAO Chengfei, MA Ning, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with biological organic fertilizer on nutrient absorption and yield of cauliflower[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(6): 153-162. | |
[15] | 熊廷浩, 资涛, 张嫒, 等. 化肥减量条件下不同有机肥用量对油菜养分利用和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021,(3): 133-139. |
XIONG Tinghao, ZI Tao, ZHANG Ai, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer dosages on nutrient utilization and yield of rapeseed under chemical fertilizer reduction[J]. Crops, 2021,(3): 133-139. | |
[16] | 田满栀. 有机肥替代化肥对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(1): 63-65. |
TIAN Manzhi. Effect of replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer on cotton growth and yield[J]. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2022, 38(1): 63-65. | |
[17] | 蒋静, 张霞, 马晓丽, 等. 施肥对新疆红花莲座期生长及N、P化学计量的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 32(3): 272-278. |
JIANG Jing, ZHANG Xia, MA Xiaoli, et al. Effects of fertilization on rosette stage growth and N, P ecological stoichiometry of Carthamus tinctorius L[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2014, 32(3): 272-278. | |
[18] | 叶祝弘. 化肥减量配施有机肥对水稻生长及稻田气体调节功能的影响[D]. 沈阳农业大学, 2018. |
YE Zhuhong. Effect of chemical fertilizer reduction combined organic fertilizer on rice growth and gas regulation value in paddy field[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[19] | 陈云梅, 肖厚军, 赵欢, 等. 商品有机肥替代化肥对春玉米生长、产量及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(1): 148-152. |
CHEN Yunmei, XIAO Houjun, ZHAO Huan, et al. Effects of commercial organic fertilizer as substitution of chemical fertilizer on growth, yield of spring maize and soil fertility[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(1): 148-152. | |
[20] |
卢合全, 唐薇, 罗振, 等. 商品有机肥替代部分化肥对连作棉田土壤养分、棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521.
DOI |
LU Hequan, TANG Wei, LUO Zhen, et al. Effects of commercial organic fertilizer substituting chemical fertilizer partially on soil nutrients, plant development, and yield in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(12): 2511-2521.
DOI |
|
[21] | 吕巨智, 范继征, 谢小东, 等. 不同耕作方式对玉米生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(7): 34-38. |
LYU Juzhi, FAN Jizheng, XIE Xiaodong, et al. Effects of different tillage managements on growth, yield and quality of maize[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(7): 34-38. | |
[22] | Geng Y H, Cao G J, Wang L C, et al. Effects of equal chemical fertilizer substitutions with organic manure on yield, dry matter, and nitrogen uptake of spring maize and soil nitrogen distribution[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(7): e0219512. |
[23] |
冯克云, 王宁, 南宏宇, 等. 水分亏缺下化肥减量配施有机肥对棉花光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 125-137.
DOI |
FENG Keyun, WANG Ning, NAN Hongyu, et al. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer application under water deficit on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 125-137.
DOI |
|
[24] |
徐令旗, 郭晓红, 兰宇辰, 等. 不同有机肥对旱直播水稻干物质积累和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2): 188-195.
DOI |
XU Lingqi, GUO Xiaohong, LAN Yuchen, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizers on dry matter accumulation and yield of dry direct-seeding rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(2): 188-195. | |
[25] | 何浩, 张宇彤, 危常州, 等. 不同有机替代减肥方式对玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(5): 281-287. |
HE Hao, ZHANG Yutong, WEI Changzhou, et al. Effects of different organic substitution reducing fertilizer patterns on maize growth and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(5): 281-287. | |
[26] |
王宁, 南宏宇, 冯克云. 化肥减量配施有机肥对棉田土壤微生物生物量、酶活性和棉花产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(1): 173-181.
DOI |
WANG Ning, NAN Hongyu, FENG Keyun. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer application on soil microbial biomass, enzyme activity and cotton yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(1): 173-181.
DOI |
[1] | HOU Xianfei, SONG Xianming, LI Qiang, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, ZENG Youling, GUO Meili, JIA Donghai. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 791-803. |
[2] | SONG Xianming, HOU Xianfei, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, GUO Meili, ZENG Youling, JIA Donghia. Effects of planting density and row spacing on growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 804-813. |
[3] | YE Yang, HOU Zhen'an, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Effects of urease/nitrification inhibitors on nutrient absorption and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 814-822. |
[4] | ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
[5] | ZHANG Lei, YAO Mengyao, LIU Zhigang, LI Juan, YANG Yang, CAI Darun, CHEN Guo, LI Bo, LI Xiaorong, CHEN Xunji, ZHAI Yunlong. Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 845-851. |
[6] | LIU Taijie, CHEN Bing, YANG Li, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jing, LI Xiang, TANG Guanglan, WANG Gang, HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong. Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 852-860. |
[7] | FU Yanbo, BIAN Qingyong, WEI Yayuan, WEI Yanhong, ZHANG Wanxu, ZHU Jinquan. Effects of formula fertilizer on physiological growth and yield of drip irrigation maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 878-884. |
[8] | RUAN Xiangyang, PU Min, XIAO Lele, LUO Linyi, CHEN Ruijie, LI Ran, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun. Effect of magnesium sulfate fertilizer application strategy on the yield and quality of processed tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 916-925. |
[9] | SUN Minghui, Yeerlan Muhetar, ZHAI Menghua, LI Xuerui, XU Xinlong, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of different planting patterns and varieties on the production of photosynthetic substances in cotton and the impact of output [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 537-546. |
[10] | ZHANG Junyao, WANG Jiayong, TANG Jianghua, LOU Shanwei, LI Wenshan, XU Wenxiu, MENG Lingyi, HE Hongtao, SANG Junmin. Effect of sowing period and density on growth and development and yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 547-555. |
[11] | ZHAO Houxiu, HAO Xianzhe, SHI Feng, LI Junhong, LIANG Qi, WANG Tangang, TIAN Liwen, LUO Honghai, WANG Jun. Effects of organic liquid fertilizer on canopy characteristics,yield and quality of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 556-564. |
[12] | LIANG Qigan, ZHANG Hao, HU Guozhi, CHEN Jihao, FENG Tongxin, CAO Qing, WANG Min, FU Xiaofa, YAN Miao, GAO Qiang, ZHANG Xuejun, ZHOU Bo, WANG Haojie. Growth,yield and quality of muskmelon in fertilization control facilities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 599-606. |
[13] | ZHANG Wei, YANG Guohui, YU Hui. Effects of 2,4-epibrassinolide on growth and related genes expression of watermelon seedlings under drought Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 615-622. |
[14] | YANG Maoqi, HOU Zhenan, MIN Wei. Effects of differential pressure and pumping fertilization devices on cotton yield and nitrogen utilization [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 271-278. |
[15] | WU Gang, TIAN Yangqing, ZHAO Qiang, LI Xinxin, Munire Abudulaini, ZHANG Jiahao, WANG Wenqing, ZHAN Dongxia, MA Chunmei. Influence of different promoters compounded with DPC on the spatial and temporal distribution of cotton boll and yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 279-287. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||