Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 852-860.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.008
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Taijie1(), CHEN Bing1(
), YANG Li2, WANG Jing3, ZHAO Jing1, LI Xiang2, TANG Guanglan2, WANG Gang1, HAN Huanyong1, WANG Fangyong1
Received:
2023-07-19
Online:
2024-04-20
Published:
2024-05-31
Correspondence author:
CHEN Bing
Supported by:
刘太杰1(), 陈兵1(
), 杨立2, 王静3, 赵静1, 李翔2, 唐广兰2, 王刚1, 韩焕勇1, 王方永1
通讯作者:
陈兵
作者简介:
刘太杰(1994-),男,新疆阿拉尔人,助理研究员,研究方向为棉花高产高效栽培,(E-mail)1569025833qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LIU Taijie, CHEN Bing, YANG Li, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jing, LI Xiang, TANG Guanglan, WANG Gang, HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong. Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 852-860.
刘太杰, 陈兵, 杨立, 王静, 赵静, 李翔, 唐广兰, 王刚, 韩焕勇, 王方永. 不同喷药机械与药剂组合对棉花脱叶催熟效果及产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 852-860.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.008
试验机型 Test model | 速度 Speed | 距离冠 层高度 High (m) | 喷液量 Liquid injection volume (L/hm2) | 喷幅 Spray amplitude (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|
大疆T16无人机 Dji T16 UAV | 5 m/s | 2 | 18 | 4.5 |
极飞P30无人机 XAG P30 UAV | 5 m/s | 2 | 15 | 4.3 |
东方红LX2204机车 DFH LX2204 | 5 km/h | 0.2 | 525 | 12 |
Tab.1 basic parameters of test model
试验机型 Test model | 速度 Speed | 距离冠 层高度 High (m) | 喷液量 Liquid injection volume (L/hm2) | 喷幅 Spray amplitude (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|
大疆T16无人机 Dji T16 UAV | 5 m/s | 2 | 18 | 4.5 |
极飞P30无人机 XAG P30 UAV | 5 m/s | 2 | 15 | 4.3 |
东方红LX2204机车 DFH LX2204 | 5 km/h | 0.2 | 525 | 12 |
处理 Treatment | 喷药机型 Spraying machine | 药剂组合 Reagent combinationt | 药剂用量 Dosage of defoliant | 水量 Water volume (L/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A) | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+720 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2+375 mL/hm2 | 18 |
T2 | 极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A) | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+720 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2+375 mL/hm2 | 15 |
T3 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 18 |
T4 | 极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 15 |
T5 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通 R+A+E+B | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2 | 18 |
T6 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 18 |
T7(CK) | 机车东方红LX2204(1遍DFH LX2204(1 time) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 525 |
Tab.2 Different treatments and dosage of drugs were tested
处理 Treatment | 喷药机型 Spraying machine | 药剂组合 Reagent combinationt | 药剂用量 Dosage of defoliant | 水量 Water volume (L/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A) | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+720 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2+375 mL/hm2 | 18 |
T2 | 极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通+中农大特定药剂(飞防助剂) Z + A +E + B + C(A) | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+720 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2+375 mL/hm2 | 15 |
T3 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 18 |
T4 | 极飞P30无人机(2遍) XAG P30 UAV(2 times) | 臻灵+助剂+乙烯利 Z + A + E | 225 g/hm2+900 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 15 |
T5 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利+贝达通 R+A+E+B | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2+225 mL/hm2 | 18 |
T6 | 大疆T16无人机(2遍) Dji T16 UAV(2 times) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 18 |
T7(CK) | 机车东方红LX2204(1遍DFH LX2204(1 time) | 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利 R+A+E | 225 g/hm2+225 g/hm2+750 g/hm2 | 525 |
处理 Treatments | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株铃数 Number of bolls per plant | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed yield (kg/hm2) | 籽棉增产率 Seed yield increase (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉增产率 Lint yield increase (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.42bc | 8.61a | 42.26ab | 6 864.26a | 24.08 | 2 900.83a | 22.66 |
T2 | 4.65ab | 8.27a | 41.91ab | 6 946.17a | 25.56 | 2 911.14a | 22.94 |
T3 | 4.50abc | 7.30bc | 40.74b | 5 926.76b | 7.13 | 2 414.56b | 2.03 |
T4 | 4.43bc | 8.05ab | 41.11ab | 6 437.66ab | 16.37 | 2 646.52ab | 12.01 |
T5 | 4.64ab | 8.27a | 41.43ab | 6 927.19a | 25.22 | 2 870.39a | 21.40 |
T6 | 4.3816c | 7.88ab | 42.48a | 6 218.55ab | 12.41 | 2 641.95ab | 11.72 |
T7(CK) | 4.69a | 6.54c | 42.77a | 5 531.91b | 0 | 2 366.18b | 0 |
Tab.3 Comparison of cotton yield and its components under different treatments
处理 Treatments | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 单株铃数 Number of bolls per plant | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed yield (kg/hm2) | 籽棉增产率 Seed yield increase (%) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉增产率 Lint yield increase (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.42bc | 8.61a | 42.26ab | 6 864.26a | 24.08 | 2 900.83a | 22.66 |
T2 | 4.65ab | 8.27a | 41.91ab | 6 946.17a | 25.56 | 2 911.14a | 22.94 |
T3 | 4.50abc | 7.30bc | 40.74b | 5 926.76b | 7.13 | 2 414.56b | 2.03 |
T4 | 4.43bc | 8.05ab | 41.11ab | 6 437.66ab | 16.37 | 2 646.52ab | 12.01 |
T5 | 4.64ab | 8.27a | 41.43ab | 6 927.19a | 25.22 | 2 870.39a | 21.40 |
T6 | 4.3816c | 7.88ab | 42.48a | 6 218.55ab | 12.41 | 2 641.95ab | 11.72 |
T7(CK) | 4.69a | 6.54c | 42.77a | 5 531.91b | 0 | 2 366.18b | 0 |
处理 Treatments | 纤维上半部 平均长度 Upper half mean length (mm) | 长度整齐度指数 Uniformity index (%) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 断裂比强度 Breaking tenacity (CN/tex) | 断裂伸长率 Breaking elongation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 28.88b | 84.30ab | 3.95a | 32.75ab | 6.75ab |
T2 | 29.21ab | 83.30c | 4.09a | 32.25bc | 6.67c |
T3 | 29.79a | 84.73a | 3.87a | 31.55c | 6.80a |
T4 | 29.88a | 84.93a | 3.53a | 33.85a | 6.70c |
T5 | 29.46ab | 84.53ab | 3.65a | 31.50c | 6.80ab |
T6 | 29.33ab | 84.80a | 3.75a | 31.53c | 6.75ab |
T7(CK) | 29.40ab | 85.20a | 4.01a | 33.20ab | 6.90a |
Tab.4 Comparison of Cotton fiber quality under different treatments
处理 Treatments | 纤维上半部 平均长度 Upper half mean length (mm) | 长度整齐度指数 Uniformity index (%) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 断裂比强度 Breaking tenacity (CN/tex) | 断裂伸长率 Breaking elongation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 28.88b | 84.30ab | 3.95a | 32.75ab | 6.75ab |
T2 | 29.21ab | 83.30c | 4.09a | 32.25bc | 6.67c |
T3 | 29.79a | 84.73a | 3.87a | 31.55c | 6.80a |
T4 | 29.88a | 84.93a | 3.53a | 33.85a | 6.70c |
T5 | 29.46ab | 84.53ab | 3.65a | 31.50c | 6.80ab |
T6 | 29.33ab | 84.80a | 3.75a | 31.53c | 6.75ab |
T7(CK) | 29.40ab | 85.20a | 4.01a | 33.20ab | 6.90a |
[1] |
王爱玉, 高明伟, 王志伟, 等. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术应用研究进展[J]. 农学学报, 2015, 5(4):20-23.
DOI |
WANG Aiyu, GAO Mingwei, WANG Zhiwei, et al. Research progress on the technology of chemical defoliation and ripening in cotton[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015, 5(4):20-23.
DOI |
|
[2] | 田晓莉, 李召虎, 段留生, 等. 棉花化学催熟与脱叶技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2006, 33(1):4-6,8. |
TIAN Xiaoli, LI Zhaohu, YIN Liusheng, et al. Chemical ripening and defoliation technology of cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2006, 33(1):4-6,8. | |
[3] | 袁会珠, 郭永旺, 薛新宇, 等. 植保无人飞机的推广应用对于提高我国农药利用率的作用[J]. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(9):46-50. |
YUAN Huizhu, GUO Yongwang, XUE Xinyu, et al. The promotion and application of UAVs for improving the utilization rate of pesticides in China[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2018, 38(9):46-50. | |
[4] | 闫晓静, 褚世海, 杨代斌, 等. 给农业插上科技的翅膀:植保无人机低容量喷雾技术助力农药减施增效[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(3):469-476. |
YAN Xiaojing, CHU Shihai, YANG Daibin, et al. Agriculture on the wings of science and technology:plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) low-volume spraying technology reduces pesticide use and boosts control efficacy[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(3):469-476. | |
[5] | 张海艳, 兰玉彬, 文晟, 等. 植保无人机旋翼风场模型与雾滴运动机理研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22):1-12. |
ZHANG Haiyan, LAN Yubin, WEN Sheng, et al. Research progress in rotor airflow model of plant protection UAV and droplet motion mechanism[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(22):1-12. | |
[6] | 雷斌, 张云生, 李忠华, 等. 棉花脱叶剂的田间效果筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324. |
LEI Bin, ZHANG Yunsheng, LI Zhonghua, et al. Field effect screening of defoliants for cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(12):2321-2324. | |
[7] | Xin F, Zhao J, Zhou Y T, et al. Effects of dosage and spraying volume on cotton defoliants efficacy:a case study based on application of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Agronomy, 2018, 8(6):85. |
[8] | Chen P C, Ouyang F, Wang G B, et al. Droplet distributions in cotton harvest aid applications vary with the interactions among the unmanned aerial vehicle spraying parameters[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021,163:113324. |
[9] | 张坤朋, 邓喜军, 王朝阳. 无人机喷洒不同棉花催熟、脱叶复合药剂效果研究[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(8):619-623. |
ZHANG Kunpeng, DENG Xijun, WANG Chaoyang. Effects of different composite chemicals on cottonripening and defoliation sprayed by UAV[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(8):619-623. | |
[10] | 王国宾, 王十周, 陈鹏超, 等. 植保无人机喷施不同雾滴粒径药剂对其在棉花冠层沉积、穿透及脱叶催熟效果的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2021, 48(3):493-500. |
WANG Guobin, WANG Shizhou, CHEN Pengchao, et al. Effect of spraying droplet size with droneson deposition,penetration,and cotton harvest-aid efficacy[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2021, 48(3):493-500. | |
[11] | 窦泽晨, 方治豪, 杜睿, 等. 棉花脱叶催熟剂药液理化性质的变化及对植保无人飞机喷施效果的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2022, 24(4):834-843. |
DOU Zechen, FANG Zhihao, DU Rui, et al. Effect of cotton harvest aids solution on spraying effectby plant protection unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2022, 24(4):834-843. | |
[12] | Xiao Q G, Xin F, Lou Z X, et al. Effect of aviation spray adjuvants on defoliant droplet deposition and cotton defoliation efficacy sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Journal of Agronomy, 2019, 9(5):217. |
[13] |
马艳, 任相亮, 蒙艳华, 等. 无人植保机在新疆棉田喷施脱叶剂测试结果评述[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(12):16-20.
DOI |
MA Yan, REN Xiangliang, MENG Yanhua, et al. Review on result of spraying defoliant by unmanned aerial vehicles in cotton field of Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(12):16-20.
DOI |
|
[14] |
马辉, 戴路, 田立文, 等. 基于TOPSIS法评价无人机喷施脱叶催熟剂的效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(2):24-28,35.
DOI |
MA Hui, DAI Lu, TIAN Liwen, et al. Evaluation of effect of unmanned aerial vehicle spraying defoliation ripening agents on cotton based on TOPSIS[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(2):24-28,35.
DOI |
|
[15] | 付凯. 植保无人机在奎屯垦区喷施棉花脱叶剂的应用效果研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. |
FU Kai, Application effect of cotton defoliant sprayed by plant protection UAV in Kuitun district[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. | |
[16] |
王林, 张强, 马江锋, 等, 新疆棉区植保无人机喷施棉花脱叶催熟剂效果研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(3):200-208.
DOI |
WANG Lin, ZHANG Qiang, MA Jiangfeng, et al. Study on the effect of spraying cotton defoliant by plant protection UAVs in Xinjiang cotton area[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 33(3):200-208. | |
[17] |
胡红岩, 任相亮, 马小艳, 等. 无人机喷施与人工喷施棉花脱叶剂效果对比[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(7):13-15,19.
DOI |
HU Hongyan, REN Xiangliang, MA Xiaoyan, et al. Comparison of defoliation effects between unmanned air vehicle spraying and artificial spraying in cotton field[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(7):13-15,19.
DOI |
|
[18] | Meng Y H, Han Y X, Liang Z J, et al. Harvest-aid application strategy in different cotton planting densities by unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2019, 2(1):31-41. |
[19] |
陈宇楠, 胡红岩, 任相亮, 等. 助剂对无人机喷施棉花脱叶剂作业效果的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(3):19-22,26.
DOI |
CHEN Yunan, HU Hongyan, REN Xiangliang, et al. Effect of aviation spray adjuvants on cotton defoliation efficacy sprayed by unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(3):19-22,26.
DOI |
|
[20] | 高军, 李兴钊, 吴春娟, 等. 多旋翼植保无人机在小麦不同生育期飞防飞行参数优选初探[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(1):77-81,101. |
GAO Jun, LI Xingzhao, WU Chunjuan, et al. Preliminary study on optimal flight parameters of multi-rotor plant protection UAV in different growth periods of wheat[J]. China Plant Protection, 2021, 41(1):77-81,101. | |
[21] | 柏超, 沈伟棋, 杨健, 等. 不同型号无人机施药对雾滴沉积和稻曲病防效的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(10):2090-2091,2095. |
BAI Chao, SHEN Weiqi, YANG Jian, et al. Effects of different types of drones on droplet depositionand control of rice smut[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 61(10):2090-2091,2095. | |
[22] |
马麒, 李吉莲, 宁新柱, 等. 新陆早60号基于两种机采种植模式下化学脱叶催熟效果分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(5):139-144.
DOI |
MA Qi, LI Jilian, NING Xinzhu, et al. Analysis on the effect of chemical defoliation and ripening of Xinluzao 60 under two kinds of mechanical cotton-picking planting models[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2020, 41(5):139-144. | |
[23] |
周先林, 覃琴, 王龙, 等. 脱叶剂对两种机采模式下棉花脱叶效果及纤维品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(11):144-152.
DOI |
ZHOU Xianlin, QIN Qin, WANG Long, et al. Influence of defoliant on defoliation effect and fiber quality of cotton under two kinds of mechanical harvesting modes[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(11):144-152.
DOI |
|
[24] | 袁会珠, 王国宾. 雾滴大小和覆盖密度与农药防治效果的关系[J]. 植物保护, 2015, 41(6):9-16. |
YUAN Huizhu, WANG Guobin. Effects of droplet size and deposition density on field efficacy of pesticides[J]. Crop Protection, 2015, 41(6):9-16. | |
[25] | 陆显斌. 植保无人机飞防作业应用特点与存在问题分析[J]. 农机使用与维修, 2021,(2):25-26. |
LUN Xianbin. Analysis of application characteristics and existing problems of plant protection UAV in flight prevention operation[J]. Agricultural Machinery Using & Maintenance, 2021,(2):25-26. |
[1] | JIA Donghia, SONG Xianming, GU Yuanguo, LI Qiang, ZENG Youling, MIAO Haocui, GUO Meili, HOU Xianfei. Effect of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying microbial one on the growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 781-790. |
[2] | HOU Xianfei, SONG Xianming, LI Qiang, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, ZENG Youling, GUO Meili, JIA Donghai. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 791-803. |
[3] | SONG Xianming, HOU Xianfei, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang, GUO Meili, ZENG Youling, JIA Donghia. Effects of planting density and row spacing on growth and yield of Carthamus tinctorius L. under mulch drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 804-813. |
[4] | YE Yang, HOU Zhen'an, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Effects of urease/nitrification inhibitors on nutrient absorption and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 814-822. |
[5] | WANG Xiaoyan, BAI Yungang, CHAI Zhongping, ZHENG Ming, DING Yu, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, HAN Zhengyu. Study on the effect of dry seeding and wet emergence on the distribution of water and salt in cotton field and the emergence rate of cotton under the control of drip irrigation in winter [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 823-834. |
[6] | ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844. |
[7] | ZHANG Lei, YAO Mengyao, LIU Zhigang, LI Juan, YANG Yang, CAI Darun, CHEN Guo, LI Bo, LI Xiaorong, CHEN Xunji, ZHAI Yunlong. Research of maize yield estimation based on unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral NDVI [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 845-851. |
[8] | QIAN Tao, WU Lili, LI Lei, Anniwaer Kuerban, DING Ruifeng. Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 861-868. |
[9] | FU Yanbo, BIAN Qingyong, WEI Yayuan, WEI Yanhong, ZHANG Wanxu, ZHU Jinquan. Effects of formula fertilizer on physiological growth and yield of drip irrigation maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 878-884. |
[10] | RUAN Xiangyang, PU Min, XIAO Lele, LUO Linyi, CHEN Ruijie, LI Ran, CHEN Guoyong, YE Jun. Effect of magnesium sulfate fertilizer application strategy on the yield and quality of processed tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 916-925. |
[11] | WANG Kaidi, GAO Chenxu, PEI Wenfeng, YANG Shuxian, ZHANG Wenqing, SONG Jikun, MA Jianjiang, WANG Li, YU Jiwen, CHEN Quanjia. Identification of TRM gene family and fiber quality related excellent haplotype analysis in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 521-536. |
[12] | SUN Minghui, Yeerlan Muhetar, ZHAI Menghua, LI Xuerui, XU Xinlong, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of different planting patterns and varieties on the production of photosynthetic substances in cotton and the impact of output [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 537-546. |
[13] | ZHANG Junyao, WANG Jiayong, TANG Jianghua, LOU Shanwei, LI Wenshan, XU Wenxiu, MENG Lingyi, HE Hongtao, SANG Junmin. Effect of sowing period and density on growth and development and yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 547-555. |
[14] | ZHAO Houxiu, HAO Xianzhe, SHI Feng, LI Junhong, LIANG Qi, WANG Tangang, TIAN Liwen, LUO Honghai, WANG Jun. Effects of organic liquid fertilizer on canopy characteristics,yield and quality of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 556-564. |
[15] | DANG Xuwei, LIN Xinyuan, HE Zheng, CHEN Yan, CI Baoxia, MA Xuehua, GUO Chenli, HE Yaxing, LIU Yang, MA Fuyu. Extraction and accuracy evaluation of cotton canopy temperature under drip irrigation based on uav thermal infrared remote sensing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 565-575. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||