Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.009

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (4): 861-868.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.04.009

• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles

Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation

QIAN Tao¹^,²(), WU Lili³, LI Lei⁴, Anniwaer Kuerban¹(), DING Ruifeng²()

1. Cotton Engineering Research Center, Ministry of Education of the P.R.C., College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Pests of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs in Korla, Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. Bazhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Korla Xinjiang 841000, China
4. Korla Zhongzhi Agricultural Science and Technology Co. Ltd, Korla Xinjiang 841000, China

Received:2023-08-07 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-05-31
Correspondence author: Anniwaer Kuerban, DING Ruifeng
Supported by:
Youth Science and Technology Top-notch Talent Program"Study on Weed Community Succession and Herbicide Digestion Dynamics in Cotton Fields of Southern Xinjiang"(2022TSYCJC0054);Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops on Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs "Research on Digestion Dynamic of Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin in Cotton Field Soil"(KFJJ202203);Stable support project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences "R & D of Key Technologies for Prevention and Control of Agricultural Diseases, Pests, Weeds and Biosafety"(xjnkywdzc-2022-004)

砜吡草唑与二甲戊灵混配对棉田阔叶杂草的防效及安全性评价

钱涛¹^,²(), 吴莉莉³, 李磊⁴, 安尼瓦尔·库尔班¹(), 丁瑞丰²()

1.新疆农业大学农学院/棉花教育部工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆巴音郭楞蒙古自治州农业技术推广中心,新疆库尔勒 841000
4.库尔勒市中植农业科技有限公司,新疆库尔勒 841000

通讯作者: 安尼瓦尔·库尔班,丁瑞丰
作者简介:钱涛(1997-),女,四川人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉田杂草综合防控,(E-mail)2514075324@qq.com
基金资助:
青年科技拔尖人才专项“南疆棉田杂草群落演替规律及主要除草剂消解动态研究”(2022TSYCJC0054);农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室开放基金“二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺在棉田土壤的分布及消解动态研究”(KFJJ202203);新疆农业科学院农业科技创新稳定支持项目“病虫草害与生物安全防控关键技术研发”(xjnkywdzc-2022-004)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To confirm the control effect on the mixture of Pyroxasulfone and Pendimethalin to broadleaf weeds in cotton field. 【Methods】 Field trials were set up with mixture of 40% Pyroxasulfone SC and 330 g/L Pendimethalin EC to evaluate its safety to cotton and control effect on broadleaf weeds, such as Solanum nigrum, Chenopodium glaucum, Amaranthus retroflexus, Portulaca oleracea, Abutilon theophrasti.【Results】 The results showed that germination rate of cotton was 80.56%-83.61% in treatment of mixed herbicides, there were no significant differences between treatment and contrast. The dosage of 330 g a.i./L Pendimethalin EC 742.5 g a.i./hm² were mixed with Pyroxasulfone SC 120, 180 and 240 g a.i./hm² respectively, and their control effects of plant to broadleaf weeds were 89.15%, 92.03% and 97.83% after 30 days and 87.94%, 91.49% and 95.56% after 45 days, the control effects of fresh weigh to broadleaf weeds were 90.80%, 93.16% and 95.65% respectively, the compound-dose treatments were more efficient than single-dose treatments on control effects of plant and fresh weight to broadleaf weeds. The yield of each treatment increased 9.89%-16.45% compared with control.【Conclusion】 40% Pyroxasulfone SC 120-180g a.i./hm² mixed with 330 g/L Pendimethalin EC are effective to control broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and safe to cotton.

Key words: cotton; pyroxasulfone; pendimethalin; broadleaf weeds; control effect; safety evaluation

摘要：

【目的】研究砜吡草唑与二甲戊灵混配对棉田阔叶杂草的防除效果,并评价其安全性。【方法】设置40%砜吡草唑SC和330 g/L二甲戊灵EC混配田间药效试验,评价各处理对棉田龙葵、灰绿藜、反枝苋、马齿苋和苘麻等阔叶杂草的防效及其对棉花生产的安全性。【结果】各处理棉花出苗率为80.56%~83.61%,与对照相比差异未达显著水平。砜吡草唑SC 120、180和240 g a.i./hm²分别与330 g/L二甲戊灵EC 742.5 g a.i./hm²混配后,药后30 d对棉田阔叶杂草的株防效分别为89.15%、92.03%和97.83%,药后45 d株防效分别为87.94%、91.49%和95.56%,鲜重防效分别为90.80%、93.16%和95.65%,混配药剂对棉田阔叶杂草的株防效和鲜重防效均优于单剂处理。各供试处理与对照相比,棉花增产幅度达9.89%~16.45%。【结论】40%砜吡草唑SC 120~180 g a.i./hm²与330 g/L二甲戊灵EC混配可用作棉花田防除阔叶杂草,对棉花出苗安全。

关键词: 棉花, 砜吡草唑, 二甲戊灵, 阔叶杂草, 防治效果, 安全性评价

CLC Number:

QIAN Tao, WU Lili, LI Lei, Anniwaer Kuerban, DING Ruifeng. Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 861-868.

钱涛, 吴莉莉, 李磊, 安尼瓦尔·库尔班, 丁瑞丰. 砜吡草唑与二甲戊灵混配对棉田阔叶杂草的防效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(4): 861-868.

Figures/Tables 6

References 32

[1]	国家统计局. 国家统计局关于2021年棉花产量的报告[DB/OL]. (2021-12-14) [2022-09-20].
	National Bureau of Statistical. National Bureau of Statistics report on cotton production in 2021[DB/OL]. (2021-12-14) [2022-09-20].
[2]	李欢欢, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 棉田化学除草现状及对策[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(5): 1-7, 10. DOI
	LI Huanhuan, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Current status and countermeasure of chemical weeding in cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(5): 1-7, 10. DOI
[3]	马小艳, 马艳, 彭军, 等. 我国棉田杂草研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4): 372-380. DOI
	MA Xiaoyan, MA Yan, PENG Jun, et al. Current situation and developing tendency of the weed researches in cotton field of China[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(4): 372-380.
[4]	朱玉永, 赵冰梅, 王林. 新疆棉田杂草发生与防除现状及对策[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(2): 1-7. DOI
	ZHU Yuyong, ZHAO Bingmei, WANG Lin. Current status of weed occurrence and control in cotton field of Xinjiang and its countermeasures[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(2): 1-7. DOI
[5]	赵冰梅, 朱玉永, 王林. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵混配使用对棉田杂草的防除效果及棉花安全性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3): 250-255, 264.
	ZHAO Bingmei, ZHU Yuyong, WANG Lin. Control effect of mixed use of flumioxazin and pendimethalin on weeds in cotton fields and safety to cotton[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(3): 250-255, 264.
[6]	Nalini K, Muthukrishnan P, Chinnusamy C. Evaluation of pendimethalin 38.7 EC on weed management in winter irrigated cotton[J]. Madras Agricultural Journal, 2011, 98: 165-168.
[7]	王恒智, 谭金妮, 吕学深, 等. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵复配的联合除草作用及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(3): 309-315.
	WANG Hengzhi, TAN Jinni, LYU Xueshen, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of the combination of flumioxazin and pendimethalin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2018, 20(3): 309-315.
[8]	郭文磊, 王兆振, 谭金妮, 等. 氟咯草酮与二甲戊灵或乙草胺复配的联合除草作用及其对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2016, 18(5): 605-611.
	GUO Wenlei, WANG Zhaozhen, TAN Jinni, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of fluorochloridone combined with pendimethalin or acetochlor[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2016, 18(5): 605-611.
[9]	黄红娟, 张朝贤, 姜翠兰, 等. 北疆棉田杂草多样性及群落组成[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(1): 7-13.
	HUANG Hongjuan, ZHANG Chaoxian, JIANG Cuilan, et al. Diversity and community composition of weeds in cotton fields of northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(1): 7-13.
[10]	张学坤, 惠慧, 赵静, 等. 新疆棉田田旋花对二甲戊灵的耐药性测定[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(7): 542-545.
	ZHANG Xuekun, XI Hui, ZHAO Jing, et al. Identification of field bindweed(Convolvulus arvensis L.) tolerance to pendimethal in cotton field in Xinjiang Province[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(7): 542-545.
[11]	杨吉春, 范玉杰, 吴峤, 等. 新型除草剂pyroxasulfone[J]. 农药, 2010, 49(12): 911-914.
	YANG Jichun, FAN Yujie, WU Qiao, et al. A novel herbicide pyroxasulfone[J]. Agrochemicals, 2010, 49(12): 911-914.
[12]	Tanetani Y, Kaku K, Kawai K, et al. Action mechanism of a novel herbicide, pyroxasulfone[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2009, 95(1): 47-55.
[13]	Tanetani Y, Ikeda M, Kaku K, et al. Role of metabolism in the selectivity of a herbicide, pyroxasulfone, between wheat and rigid ryegrass seedlings[J]. Journal of Pesticide Science, 2013, 38(3): 152-156.
[14]	Kleemann S G L, Boutsalis P, Gill G S, et al. Applications of pre-emergent pyroxasulfone, flufenacet and their mixtures with triallate for the control of Bromus diandrus (ripgut brome) in no-till wheat (Triticum aestivum) crops of southern Australia[J]. Crop Protection, 2016, 80: 144-148.
[15]	李琦, 郭文磊, 孟琦, 等. 27%二甲戊灵·砜吡草唑乳油防治棉花田一年生杂草效果与安全性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(25): 121-124. DOI
	LI Qi, GUO Wenlei, MENG Qi, et al. Control effect and safety of pendimethalin-pyroxasulfone 27% EC against annual weeds in cotton field[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(25): 121-124. DOI
[16]	王曌, 刘煜财, 王广祥, 等. 850 g/kg砜吡草唑WG对玉米田杂草防除效果及对不同作物安全性评价[J]. 农药, 2021, 60(8): 610-613.
	WANG Zhao, LIU Yucai, WANG Guangxiang, et al. Control effect of pyroxasulfone 850 g/kg WG on weeds in corn field and safety evaluation of different crops[J]. Agrochemicals, 2021, 60(8): 610-613.
[17]	徐洪乐, 樊金星, 张宏军, 等. 麦田新型除草剂砜吡草唑的除草活性[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4): 288-292.
	XU Hongle, FAN Jinxing, ZHANG Hongjun, et al. Herbicidal activity of a novel herbicide pyroxasulfone in wheat field[J]. Plant Protection, 2019, 45(4): 288-292.
[18]	李琦, 刘亦学, 于金萍, 等. 40%砜吡草唑悬浮剂防除冬小麦田一年生杂草效果与安全性[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(3): 73-77.
	LI Qi, LIU Yixue, YU Jinping, et al. Efficacy of pyroxasulfone 40% SC against annual weeds and selectivity to wheat[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(3): 73-77.
[19]	GB/T 17980. 128-2004, 农药田间药效试验准则(二)第128部分:除草剂防治棉花田杂草[S].
	GB/T 17980. 128-2004, Pesticide- -Guidelines for the field efficacy trials(Ⅱ)- -Part 128:Herbicides against weeds in cotton[S].
[20]	Coakes S J. SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish: version 20.0 for Windows[M]. John Wiley & Sons. 2013.
[21]	梁友, 贾会娟, 董雪, 等. 4种土壤处理除草剂对龙葵的防除效果及安全性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(1): 102-108.
	LIANG You, JIA Huijuan, DONG Xue, et al. The effects of four soil-applied herbicides on control of Solanum nigrum l.and safety evaluation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2014, 36(1): 102-108.
[22]	许贤, 王贵启, 李丽珍. 二甲戊灵室内除草毒力测定[J]. 西北农业学报, 2007, 16(4): 228-230.
	XU Xian, WANG Guiqi, LI Lizhen. Studies on the herbicidal activity of pendimethalin[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2007, 16(4): 228-230.
[23]	李文杰, 钟亮, 崔家丽, 等. 基于正交设计棉田龙葵的化学防除研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(1): 70-74.
	LI Wenjie, ZHONG Liang, CUI Jiali, et al. Chemical control of cotton field Solanum nigrum L. based on Orthogonal Design[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science), 2017, 35(1): 70-74.
[24]	马小艳, 马亚杰, 姜伟丽, 等. 7种土壤处理除草剂对北疆棉田杂草的防效及其安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2014, 41(11): 13-15, 20. DOI
	MA Xiaoyan, MA Yajie, JIANG Weili, et al. Control efficacy and safety of seven soil-applied herbicides in cotton field in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2014, 41(11): 13-15, 20. DOI
[25]	Moss S R. Herbicide cross-resistance in slender foxtail (Alopecurus myosuroides)[J]. Weed Science, 1990, 38(6): 492-496.
[26]	徐洪乐, 苏旺苍, 冷秋丽, 等. 砜吡草唑对玉米田杂草的除草活性及其安全性评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(2): 157-163.
	XU Hongle, SU Wangcang, LENG Qiuli, et al. Herbicidal activity and safety evaluation of pyroxasulfone against corn fields weeds[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2021, 29(2): 157-163.
[27]	Olson B L S, Zollinger R K, Thompson C R, et al. Pyroxasulfone with and without sulfentrazone in sunflower (Helianthus annuus)[J]. Weed Technology, 2011, 25(2): 217-221.
[28]	吴仁海, 徐洪乐, 李慧龙, 等. 砜吡草唑与氰草津混用对麦田杂草的防治效果[J]. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(10): 84-91.
	WU Renhai, XU Hongle, LI Huilong, et al. Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with cyanazine on weeds in wheat field[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 50(10): 84-91. DOI
[29]	Nurse R E, Sikkema P H, Robinson D E. Weed control and sweet maize (Zea mays L.) yield as affected by pyroxasulfone dose[J]. Crop Protection, 2011, 30(7): 789-793.
[30]	苏少泉. 除草剂新品种Pyroxasulfone的开发与使用[J]. 农药, 2012, 51(2): 133-134.
	SU Shaoquan. The development and application of novel herbicide pyroxasulfone[J]. Agrochemicals, 2012, 51(2): 133-134.
[31]	顾闻. 砜吡草唑在土壤和水环境中的环境行为特性研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017.
	GU Wen. Study of the Environmental Behaviros of Pyroxasulfone in Soil and Water Environment[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2017.
[32]	张朝贤, 黄红娟, 崔海兰, 等. 抗药性杂草与治理[J]. 植物保护, 2013, 39(5): 99-102.
	ZHANG Chaoxian, HUANG Hongjuan, CUI Hailan, et al. Herbicide-resistant weeds and their management[J]. Plant Protection, 2013, 39(5): 99-102.

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicide	制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/667 m²)	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g a.i./hm²)
1	40%砜吡草唑SC+ 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	15+150	90+742.5
2		20+150	120+742.5
3		30+150	180+742.5
4		40+150	240+742.5
5	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	20	120
6	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	150	742.5
7	人工除草	-	-
8	空白对照	-	-

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicide	制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/667 m²)	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g a.i./hm²)
1	40%砜吡草唑SC+ 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	15+150	90+742.5
2		20+150	120+742.5
3		30+150	180+742.5
4		40+150	240+742.5
5	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	20	120
6	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	150	742.5
7	人工除草	-	-
8	空白对照	-	-

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicides	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g a.i./hm²)	出苗率 Rate of emergence (%)
1	40%砜吡草唑SC+ 330 g/L 二甲戊灵EC	90+742.5	80.56±3.22^a
2		120+742.5	81.94±3.31^a
3		180+742.5	82.22±5.79^a
4		240+742.5	82.50±3.52^a
5	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L 二甲戊灵EC 人工除草空白对照	120	82.78±3.92^a
6		742.5	82.59±3.06^a
7		--	83.61±2.66^a
8		--	83.06±4.96^a

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicides	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g a.i./hm²)	出苗率 Rate of emergence (%)
1	40%砜吡草唑SC+ 330 g/L 二甲戊灵EC	90+742.5	80.56±3.22^a
2		120+742.5	81.94±3.31^a
3		180+742.5	82.22±5.79^a
4		240+742.5	82.50±3.52^a
5	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L 二甲戊灵EC 人工除草空白对照	120	82.78±3.92^a
6		742.5	82.59±3.06^a
7		--	83.61±2.66^a
8		--	83.06±4.96^a

处理 Treatments	龙葵 Solanum nigrum	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum	反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus	马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea	苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti	阔叶杂草 Broadleaf weeds
1	84.65±2.31^d	82.20±0.72^c	83.75±2.01^ab	81.94±5.61^ab	81.25±7.12^ab	84.78±1.33^c
2	89.74±0.70^bc	89.75±4.30^abc	88.61±4.98^a	88.19±1.75^a	86.81±5.93^ab	89.15±0.57^bc
3	93.75±0.54^ab	92.13±1.97^ab	91.67±2.78^a	92.08±3.43^a	91.67±8.33^ab	92.03±0.69^ab
4	97.73±0.33^a	94.15±1.06^a	93.75±3.99^a	95.14±4.86^a	97.92±2.08^a	97.83±1.35^a
5	85.71±1.18^cd	85.16±2.49^bc	84.44±4.30^ab	86.81±2.08^a	82.64±6.84^ab	85.30±3.57^c
6	73.99±2.31^e	72.41±3.21^d	74.03±6.45^b	71.94±5.99^b	72.22±7.61^b	73.67±3.24^d
7	96.80±0.46^a	94.26±1.35^a	94.17±3.63^a	92.36±4.73^a	95.83±4.17^a	94.14±1.74^ab

Control effect of pyroxasulfone mixed with pendimethalin on broadleaf weeds in cotton filed and its safety evaluation

砜吡草唑与二甲戊灵混配对棉田阔叶杂草的防效及安全性评价

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

处理 Treatments	龙葵 Solanum nigrum	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum	反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus	马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea	苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti	阔叶杂草 Broadleaf weeds
1	82.28±1.41^d	81.91±3.25^c	82.65±1.51^b	81.49±3.53^c	80.14±3.31^cd	82.54±3.07^c
2	88.46±0.53^c	87.59±1.09^abc	87.66±1.06^ab	85.46±2.00^abc	84.17±4.33^abcd	87.94±1.35^bc
3	92.76±0.42^b	91.47±1.21^ab	90.32±1.69^ab	90.62±1.15^abc	89.31±4.14^abc	91.49±0.96^ab
4	96.99±0.34^a	94.53±1.18^a	93.31±1.36^a	93.95±2.45^a	93.75±2.08^a	95.56±1.13^a
5	84.53±0.97^d	83.99±2.82^bc	83.73±1.73^b	83.08±3.49b^c	82.08±1.05^bcd	83.48±1.32^c
6	73.47±1.39^e	71.70±4.38^d	72.63±5.45^c	71.95±3.74^d	73.75±3.97^d	73.56±2.23^d
7	95.74±0.62^a	94.09±1.20^a	92.47±0.33^a	92.18±3.62^ab	92.08±3.43^ab	94.61±1.50^a

处理 Treatments	龙葵 Solanum nigrum	灰绿藜 Chenopodium glaucum	反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus	马齿苋 Portulaca oleracea	苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti	阔叶杂草 Broadleaf weeds
1	83.15±2.37^d	82.58±2.46^c	83.99±1.21^c	81.69±0.85^d	80.97±0.96^d	83.55±0.88^c
2	91.47±0.79^b	90.35±1.39^b	90.50±0.34^b	91.69±0.45^b	90.42±0.29^b	90.80±0.68^b
3	93.03±0.72^ab	93.32±1.38^ab	94.21±0.32^a	94.62±0.68^a	93.50±0.26^a	93.16±0.88^ab
4	96.08±0.54^a	95.36±0.35^a	95.12±0.34^a	94.41±0.40^a	94.09±0.35^a	95.65±0.28^a
5	87.36±0.84^c	85.08±0.42^c	85.05±0.66^c	84.20±0.75^c	83.32±0.32^c	86.12±0.40^c
6	74.93±0.73^e	74.24±1.48^d	73.89±0.99^d	73.49±0.53^e	74.37±0.71^e	76.50±1.86^d
7	95.73±0.17^a	94.85±0.32^a	94.13±0.51^a	93.79±0.89^a	93.61±0.35^a	95.00±0.23^a

处理 Treatments	供试药剂 Herbicides	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g a.i./hm²)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	与对照相比± Compared with the control±(%)
1	40%砜吡草唑SC+ 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC	90+742.5	4 375.95±113.47^ab	9.89
2		120+742.5	4 524.76±158.13^a	13.63
3		180+742.5	4 578.55±204.78^a	14.98
4		240+742.5	4 637.32±167.45^a	16.45
5	40%砜吡草唑SC 330 g/L二甲戊灵EC 人工除草空白对照	120	4 412.21±110.28^ab	10.80
6		742.5	4 298.46±47.74^ab	7.94
7		--	4 389.69±142.97^ab	10.24
8		--	3 982.12±98.24^b	--

[1]	YE Yang, HOU Zhen'an, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Effects of urease/nitrification inhibitors on nutrient absorption and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 814-822.
[2]	WANG Xiaoyan, BAI Yungang, CHAI Zhongping, ZHENG Ming, DING Yu, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, HAN Zhengyu. Study on the effect of dry seeding and wet emergence on the distribution of water and salt in cotton field and the emergence rate of cotton under the control of drip irrigation in winter [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 823-834.
[3]	LIU Taijie, CHEN Bing, YANG Li, WANG Jing, ZHAO Jing, LI Xiang, TANG Guanglan, WANG Gang, HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong. Effects of different spraying machinery and pesticide combination on the defoliation,the ripeness,yield and quality of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 852-860.
[4]	SUN Minghui, Yeerlan Muhetar, ZHAI Menghua, LI Xuerui, XU Xinlong, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of different planting patterns and varieties on the production of photosynthetic substances in cotton and the impact of output [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 537-546.
[5]	ZHANG Junyao, WANG Jiayong, TANG Jianghua, LOU Shanwei, LI Wenshan, XU Wenxiu, MENG Lingyi, HE Hongtao, SANG Junmin. Effect of sowing period and density on growth and development and yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 547-555.
[6]	ZHAO Houxiu, HAO Xianzhe, SHI Feng, LI Junhong, LIANG Qi, WANG Tangang, TIAN Liwen, LUO Honghai, WANG Jun. Effects of organic liquid fertilizer on canopy characteristics,yield and quality of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 556-564.
[7]	DANG Xuwei, LIN Xinyuan, HE Zheng, CHEN Yan, CI Baoxia, MA Xuehua, GUO Chenli, HE Yaxing, LIU Yang, MA Fuyu. Extraction and accuracy evaluation of cotton canopy temperature under drip irrigation based on uav thermal infrared remote sensing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 565-575.
[8]	CHEN Pei, BAO Junxiu, WANG Fei, TANG Shouwu, LIU Haifeng, LI Hongbin. Extraction of total flavonoids from green cotton fiber by ultrasonic-based response surface optimization [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 576-583.
[9]	YANG Maoqi, HOU Zhenan, MIN Wei. Effects of differential pressure and pumping fertilization devices on cotton yield and nitrogen utilization [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 271-278.
[10]	WU Gang, TIAN Yangqing, ZHAO Qiang, LI Xinxin, Munire Abudulaini, ZHANG Jiahao, WANG Wenqing, ZHAN Dongxia, MA Chunmei. Influence of different promoters compounded with DPC on the spatial and temporal distribution of cotton boll and yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 279-287.
[11]	MAO Tingyong, LIU Chan, YANG Beifang, LI Yabing, ZHOU Yun, WANG Dong, CHEN Guodong, WAN Sumei. Response characteristics of source and sink organs of drip irrigation cotton to chemical topping [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 288-299.
[12]	HUI Ruihan, LIN Li, CAO Wei, ZHANG Mengke, LIN Hao, YAO Shuai. Design and experiment of intelligent irrigation system for cotton field based on P-M model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 300-309.
[13]	WANG Heya, LUO Jingjing, WANG Kang, WANG Ruinan, WANG Xu, GAO Guangrui, FANG Yan. Effects of different microbial agents on the disease prevention effect and yield of beetroot rot [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 448-454.
[14]	LIU Zhenya, SU Xuanle, TANG Li, JIANG Siming, LI Yapeng, DAN Hongxia, ZHANG Wangbin. Toxicity determination of Twenty-two antibiotics against oear fire blight and its safety evaluation on floral organ [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 461-468.
[15]	MA Hui, LUO Dan, LI Xingxing, TIAN Liwen, DAI Lu, OU Huan, AImaierjiang Abulitifu, Aziguli Abulizi, Abuduaini Abuduweili. Effects of chemical topping on plant architecture and yield of cotton with different fruit branch numbers and its screening of evaluation indicators [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 261-270.